管制员压力产生过程LEADSTO动态仿真分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2019.10.18

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 116-120.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2019.10.18

管制员压力产生过程LEADSTO动态仿真分析

王洁宁1,2,张聪俊1,2,房晓丹1,2,孙晓萌1,2

(1. 中国民航大学空中交通管理研究基地，天津 300300； 2. 中国民航大学天津市空管运行规划与安全技术重点实验室，天津 300300)

收稿日期:2018-01-14 修回日期:2018-11-13 出版日期:2019-10-14 发布日期:2019-10-14
作者简介:王洁宁(1966—)，男，甘肃兰州人，研究员，主要从事空管运行安全及空管系统仿真方面的研究。Email：553143419@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划资助项目(2016YFB0502401)；国家空管委项目基金资助项目(GKG201410003)；中央高校基本科研业务费项目(3122017062)

LEADSTO Dynamic Simulation Analysis on ATC Pressure Generation Process

WANG Jiening1,2, ZHANG Congjun1,2, FANG Xiaodan1,2 , SUN Xiaomeng1,2

(1. Air Traffic Management Research Base of Civil Aviation University of China, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300,P. R. China; 2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Operation Programming and Safety Technology of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, P. R. China)

Received:2018-01-14 Revised:2018-11-13 Online:2019-10-14 Published:2019-10-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究管制员的压力产生过程，采取有效措施缓解管制员的压力，首先对管制员压力问题进行分析，通过查阅资料及调研总结出管制员职业特点及其压力源分类及影响,进而基于BODY-LOOP理论采用逻辑建模语言LEADSTO(Language and Environment for Analysis of Dynamics by SimulaTiOn)建立压力产生模型；根据所建模型，实现压力产生模型的仿真,揭示动态的复杂过程中各个环节的变化规律。通过形式化分析，提出了在压力产生过程中不同层次之间的逻辑关系,为研究管制员压力提供了理论依据。研究结果表明：与传统方法对比，本方法能对动态系统进行仿真，在时态性和复杂程度上具有一定的优势,及时发现管制员的压力变化过程，为避免因管制员压力而产生不安全事件提供参考依据。

关键词: 交通工程, 空中交通管理, 空中交通管制员, 逻辑建模语言, 压力产生模型, 仿真分析

Abstract: In order to study the pressure generation process of controllers and take effective measures to alleviate the pressure of controllers, the pressure problem of controllers was analyzed firstly. Through consulting data and investigating, the professional characteristics of controllers and the classification and influence of their pressure source were summarized. Furthermore, based on BODY-LOOP theory, the pressure generation model was established by the logic modeling language LEADSTO (Language and Environment for Analysis of Dynamics by Simulation). According to the established model, the simulation of pressure generation model was realized, and the changing law of each link in the dynamic and complex process was revealed. Through the formal analysis, the logical relationship between different levels in the process of pressure generation was proposed, which provided theoretic basis for the study on the pressure of the controllers. Compared with the traditional method, the proposed method can simulate the dynamic system, which has certain advantages in temporal and complexity. It can also detect the pressure change process of the controllers timely, and provide reference for avoiding unsafe events caused by the pressure of the controllers.

Key words: traffic engineering, air traffic management, air traffic controller, logic modeling language, pressure generation model, simulation analysis

中图分类号:

王洁宁1,2,张聪俊1,2,房晓丹1,2,孙晓萌1,2. 管制员压力产生过程LEADSTO动态仿真分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(10): 116-120.

WANG Jiening1,2, ZHANG Congjun1,2, FANG Xiaodan1,2 , SUN Xiaomeng1,2. LEADSTO Dynamic Simulation Analysis on ATC Pressure Generation Process[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2019, 38(10): 116-120.

参考文献

［1］彭金栓,高翠翠,郭应时.基于熵率值的驾驶人视觉与心理负荷特性分析［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2014,33(2):118-121.
PENG Jinshuang, GAO Cuicui, GUO Yingshi.Drivers visual charac -teristics and mental load based on entropy rates［J］. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University
(Natural Science), 2014,33 (2):118-121.
［2］丰婷, 罗帆. 应对方式对管制员工作压力与指挥决策失误的影响［J］. 安全与环境学报, 2014, 14(3)：72-76.
FENG Ting, LUO Fang. Impact of cope styles to the job stress and their command decision-making faults of the air traffic controllers［J］. Journal of Safety and
Environment, 2014, 14(3)：72-76.
［3］张明, 韩松臣, 杭勇,等. 基于改进的可拓评价模型的安全管制员工作负荷综合评估模型［J］. 安全与环境学报, 2014, 14(1):84-87.
ZHANG Ming, HAN Songchen, HANG Yong, et al. An integrated evaluation model of the safety controllers workload based on improved extension evaluation model［J］.
Journal of Safety and Environment,2014, 14(1):84-87.
［4］裴成功, 韩松臣, 刘星. 管制员工作负荷评估的回归分析法［J］. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2007, 39(1):107-112.
PEI Chenggong, HAN Songchen, LIU Xing. Regression analysis method for evaluating ATC controller workload［J］. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and
Astronautics, 2007, 39(1):107-112.
［5］ WILLIAMS B S, COOPER L. Managing Workplace Stress: A Best Prac-tice Blueprint［M］. Chichester, England :Wiley, 2002.
［6］ DEMEROUTI E, BAKKER A B, NACHREINERF, et al. The job demands-resources model of burnout［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(3):499-512.
［7］ IVANCEVICH J M, KONOPASKE R. Human Resource Management［M］. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin,2013.
［8］ DAMASIO A R .Self Comes to Mind : Constructing the Conscious Brain［M］. New York: Pantheon Books, 2010.
［9］ BOSSE T, JONKER C M, MEIJ L V D, et al. Methodology and simula-tion-LEADSTO: a language and environment for analysis of dynamics by simulation［J］. Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, 2005, 16(3):165-178.
［10］ BOSSE T, JONKER C M, SCHUT MC, et al. Simulation and analysis of shared extended mind［J］. Simulation-Transactions of the Society for Modeling and
Simulation International, 2004, 81(10):191-200.
［11］ BOSSE T, JONKER C M, VAN D M L, et al. Specification and verification of dynamics in cognitive agent models［C］//IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on
Intelligent Agent Technology:IEEE,2006:247-254.
［12］ MANZANO M. Extensions of First Order Logic［M］. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
［13］ SHARPANSKYKH A, STROEVE S H. An agent-based approach for structured modeling, analysis and improvement of safety culture［J］. Computational & Mathematical
Organization Theory, 2011, 17(1):77-117.
［14］ BOSSE T, M. MOGLES N. Studying aviation incidents by agent-based simulation and analysis-A case study on a runway incursion incident［C］//In Proceedings of
the 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence-Volume 1.［s.l.］:ICAART,2013.
［15］ BOSSE T, MEMON Z A, TREUR J. A recursive BDI agent model for theory of mind and its applications［J］. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 25(1):1-44.

[1]	唐继强1, 2，钟鑫伟2，刘健1，李天瑞3. 基于时间序列季节分类模型的轨道交通客流短期预测[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 31-38.
[2]	戚春华，王笑男，朱守林，李航天. 基于驾驶员视觉兴趣区域的交通工程设施信息量阈值研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 53-60.
[3]	邓天民1，朱杰2，朱凯家1，屈治华3. 基于iForest+Biscting K-means的驾驶风格辨识方法研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 1-6.
[4]	许茂增,张莉. 基于双射软决策理论的路段拥堵影响力识别[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 7-11.
[5]	王涛1，谢思红1，黎文皓1,2，李文勇1. 基于FFOS-ELM和PF的短时交通流自适应预测模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 21-27.
[6]	张诚1，汪成银1，陈志伟2，张正向3，张子磊3. 基于空间流量度的城市路网关键节点挖掘方法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 28-35.
[7]	王永岗，张衡，彭志鹏，周琬琦. 基于结构方程模型的出租车事故影响因素分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 36-42.
[8]	朱顺应，李维吉，林小媛，肖文彬，王红. 特色小镇游客车辆无复检管控点布设研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 52-58.
[9]	潘兵宏1,2，胡炜1，任卉1,单慧敏1. 基于TruckSim仿真下弯道货车侧滑速度模型研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 38-45.
[10]	吴文静，孙刃超，宗芳，贾洪飞. 居民低碳通勤出行的主观态度识别及影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 53-58.
[11]	李军，邓育新. 基于非负矩阵分解的出租车时空行为聚类分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 59-65.
[12]	成卫1，刘翔1，雷建明2. 基于RBF神经网络预测的交叉口信号周期时长优化[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 13-18.
[13]	史天亮，王文光. 信息观和粒子群算法在城市交通拥堵中的研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 19-25.
[14]	贺玉龙1,2，刘磊1,2，迟佳欣1,2. 高速公路车辆换道行为风险研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 26-33.
[15]	王露1，陈肖欣2，李华恩1. 大风雨雪气象条件下高速公路车辆稳定行驶的临界车速研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 34-40.

管制员压力产生过程LEADSTO动态仿真分析

LEADSTO Dynamic Simulation Analysis on ATC Pressure Generation Process

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics