大跨径低刚度钢桥面铺装三维仿真力学分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.09.10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究大跨径低刚度钢桥在不同铺装方案下的力学响应状态，采用Midas/civil软件建立了武汉某长江大桥全桥有限元模型，采用ANSYS软件建立了GA+SMA和三层EA铺装方案的三维仿真模型，分析了该桥主桥跨中的挠曲变形，以及2种铺装方案在162个荷载工况下的弯拉应变和层间剪应力。研究结果表明：随着重载交通量的增加，该桥跨中存在较大的挠动，最大挠度值达到1.02 m，为初始设计值的132.5%；在最不利荷载组合下，铺装体系刚度对组合结构弯拉应变和层间剪应力均有显著的影响，铺装体系刚度大，则纵向最大弯拉应变大，横向最大弯拉应变和层间最大剪应力小；2种铺装方案的横向最大弯拉应变和纵向最大弯拉应变均呈现铺装表面＞铺装层间＞顶板表面，铺装表面横向最大弯拉应变＞铺装表面纵向最大弯拉应变，层间最大剪应力总体呈现铺装层间＞顶板表面；大跨径低刚度钢桥在进行组合结构疲劳开裂和层间脱层推移指标设计时，宜将铺装层表面横向最大弯拉应变和防水层黏结抗剪强度作为控制指标，并通过组合结构疲劳开裂试验和剪切疲劳试验，以确定不同铺装方案的适应性，以及材料和组合结构指标要求。

关键词: 桥梁工程, 钢桥面铺装, 三维仿真, 浇注式沥青混合料, 环氧沥青混合料, 低刚度

Abstract: In order to study the mechanical response of long-span and low-stiffness steel bridge with different pavement schemes, Midas/civil software was used to establish the finite element model of a certain Yangtze River Bridge in Wuhan, and ANSYS software was used to establish the three-dimensional simulation model of GA+SMA and tri-layer EA pavement scheme. Then, flexural deformation of the main span of the proposed bridge was analyzed, and flexural-tensile strain and interlaminar shear stress of the two pavement schemes under 162 load conditions were calculated. The research results show that: with the increase of heavy traffic volume, there is a large deflection in the mid-span of the bridge, and the maximum deflection reaches 1.02m, which is 132.5% of the initial design value. Under the most adverse load combination, the stiffness of pavement system has a significant impact on the flexural-tensile strain and interlaminar shear stress of the composite structure. In general, the greater the stiffness of pavement system, the greater the longitudinal maximum flexural-tensile strain, and the smaller the transverse maximum flexural-tensile strain and the interlaminar maximum shear stress. The transverse maximum flexural-tensile strain and longitudinal maximum flexural-tensile strain of pavement surface, interlayer and roof surface of the two pavement schemes show a decreasing trend. In addition, the transverse maximum flexural strain is greater than the longitudinal maximum flexural strain of pavement surface. The interlaminar shear stress of interlayer and steel deck surface of the two pavement schemes show a decreasing trend. The transverse maximum flexural-tensile strain of pavement surface and shear strength of waterproof layer should be taken as control indexes, and the fatigue cracking test and shear fatigue test of composite structure should be carried out to determine the adaptability of different pavement schemes and the requirements of material and composite structure indexes, in the design of fatigue cracking and interlaminar delamination displacement index of composite structure for long-span and low-stiffness steel bridge.

Key words: bridge engineering, steel bridge deck pavement, three-dimension simulation, gussasphalt mixture, epoxy asphalt mixture, low-rigidity

中图分类号:

U441.5

王滔1,2，徐恭义3，常城1,2，肖丽1,2，王民1,2. 大跨径低刚度钢桥面铺装三维仿真力学分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(09): 67-73.

WANG Tao1,2, XU Gongyi3, CHANG Cheng1,2, XIAO Li1,2, WANG Min1,2. Three-Dimension Simulation Mechanical Analysis of Deck Pavement of Long-Span and Low-Stiffness Steel Bridge[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2020, 39(09): 67-73.

参考文献

［1］董宇辉,周志敏.礐石大桥轻型组合桥面结构应用概述［J］.公路交通科技(应用技术版),2017,13(5):211-213.
DONG Yuhui,ZHOU Zhimin. Application of light-weighted composite bridge deck in panshi bridge［J］. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development
(Application Technology Version), 2017,13(5):211-213.
［2］王忠彬,万田保.泰州长江公路大桥三塔两跨悬索桥结构行为特征［J］.桥梁建设,2008(2):38-40+59.
WANG Zhongbin,WAN Tianbao. Characteristics of structural behavior of three-tower and two-span suspension bridge of taizhou changjiang river highway bridge ［J］.
Bridge Construction, 2008 (2):38-40+59.
［3］柳富勇.基于重载条件的钢桥面铺装层疲劳性能研究［D］. 南京：南京林业大学,2017.
LIU Fuyong.Study on the Surfacing Fatigue Test of Steel Bridge Deck Based on the Heavy Load Conditions ［D］. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2017.
［4］向鑫.面向白沙洲大桥健康监测系统的结构损伤及重车效应分析［D］. 武汉：武汉理工大学,2012.
XIANG Xin.Effect Analysis of the Structural Damage and Heavy Load Vehicle Base on the Health Observation System of Baishazhou Bridge ［D］. Wuhan :Wuhan University
of Technology, 2012.
［5］姜从盛,姚永永,丁庆军,等.白沙洲大桥钢桥面铺装层修复方案受力分析与材料设计［J］.公路工程, 2007,32(4):87-90+95.
JIANG Congsheng, YAO Yongyong, DING Qingjun, et al. Stress analysis and materials design of repairing steel deck pavement of Baishazhou Bridge ［J］. Highway
Engineering, 2007,32(4):87-90+95.
［6］高博.钢桥面典型铺装方案及其病害和维修方法［J］.公路,2012(7):29-34.
GAO Bo. Typical paving scheme of steel bridge deck and its disease and maintenance methods ［J］. Highway, 2012(7):29-34.
［7］ CHENG Gang, CHEN Xianhua, WANG Xiao. Analysis on cracking of deck pavement on Jiangyin bridge ［J］.Journal of Southeast University, 2005, 21(4):490-494.
［8］程庆,王大明,吴春颖.钢桥面沥青铺装层病害及成因分析［J］.公路工程,2010,35(3):112-115.
CHENG Qing, WANG Daming, WU Chunying. Analysis on diseases and their causes of steel deck asphalt pavement ［J］. Highway Engineering, 2010,35(3):112-115.
［9］谢伟伟. 钢桥面铺装病害分析及修复材料研究［D］.广州：华南理工大学,2017.
XIE Weiwei.Study on the Distress Analysis of Steel Bridge Deck Pavement and Repairing Material ［D］. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2017.
［10］许颖.钢桥面铺装使用情况调查及病害分析［D］. 重庆：重庆交通大学,2014.
XU Ying. The Performance Survey and Deterioration Analysis of Steel Bridge Deck Paving ［D］. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University,2014.
［11］李嘉,冯啸天,邵旭东,等.STC钢桥面铺装新体系的力学计算与实桥试验对比分析［J］.中国公路学报,2014,27(3):39-44+50.
LI Jia, FENG Xiaotian, SHAO Xudong, et al. Comparison of mechanical calculation and actual test for new stc steel bridge paving system［J］. China Journal of
Highway and Transport, 2014, 27 (3):39-44+50.
［12］徐军,陈忠延.正交异性钢桥面板的结构分析［J］.同济大学学报(自然科学版),1999,27(2):170-174.
XU Jun, CHEN Zhongyan. Structural analysis of orthotropic steel bridge deck ［J］. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 1999,27(2):170-174.
［13］方志,张国刚,唐盛华,等.混凝土斜拉桥动力有限元建模与模型修正［J］.中国公路学报,2013,26(3):77-85.
FANG Zhi, ZHANG Guogang. TANG Shenghua, et al. Finite element modeling and model updating of concrete cable-stayed bridge［J］. China Journal of Highway and
Transport, 2013, 26 (3):77-85.
［14］中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范: JTG 3362—2018 ［S］. 北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司,2018.
Ministry of Transport of the Peoples Republic of China. Specifications for Design of Highway Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete and Culverts: JTG
3362—2018 ［S］. Beijing: China Communications Press Co.,Ltd., 2018.
［15］赵锋军,李宇峙,易伟建.桥面沥青铺装层间应力分析简化模型［J］.土木工程学报,2007,40(6):100-104.
ZHAO Fengjun, LI Yuzhi, YI Weijian. A Simplified model for inter laminar stress analysis of bridge asphalt pavement ［J］. China Civil Engineering Journal,
2007,40(6):100-104.
［16］胡光伟.大跨径钢桥面铺装体系力学分析与优化设计［D］.南京：东南大学,2005.
HU Guangwei.Mechanical Analysis and Structural Optimum Design for Deck Paving of Long-Span Steel Bridge ［D］. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2005.
［17］郝增恒,王民.大跨径钢桥面沥青混合料铺装技术［M］.北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司,2018.
HAO Zengheng, WANG Min. Asphalt Mixture Paving Technology of Long Span Steel Deck ［M］. Beijing: China Communications Press Co.,Ltd., 2018.
［18］ WANG Min, LIANG Naixing, XIAO Li, et al. Modulus parameter analysis and calculation of steel deck asphalt pavement material［J］. Materials Science Forum,
2016, 852(4):1436-1442.
［19］包龙生,谢得璞,祁琳.钢桥面沥青混凝土铺装层静力响应研究［J］.建筑科学与工程学报,2018,35(2):103-110.
BAO Longsheng, XIE Depu, QI Lin. Study on static response of asphalt concrete pavement on steel deck ［J］. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2018,35
(2):103-110.
［20］肖丽,杜小平,王民,等. 万州驸马长江大桥钢桥面耐久性铺装设计方案与控制指标［J］. 公路交通技术,2018,34(2):50-55.
XIAO Li，DU Xiaoping，WANG Min, et al. Durable pavement designing scheme and control index of steel bridge deck of Wanzhou Fuma Yangtze river bridge ［J］.
Technology of Highway and Transport, 2018, 34(2):50-55.
［21］ XU Qinwu, ZHOU Qinghua, CESAR M, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of a waterproofing adhesive layer used on concrete-bridge decks［J］.
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009, 29(7):525-234.
［22］ RAPOSEIRASA C. Influence of surface macro-texture and binder dosage on the adhesion between bituminous pavement layers ［J］. Construction and Building
Materials, 2012, 28(1): 187-192.
［23］赵阳,周启伟,胡德勇.安徽省钢桥面铺装技术状况评价研究［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2018,37(3):9-13.
ZHAO Yang, ZHOU Qiwei, HU Deyong. Evaluation study on technical status of steel bridge deck paving in Anhui province［J］. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University
(Natural Science) ,2018,37(3):9-13.

[1]	周建庭1,2，黎娅2，张洪2，夏润川2，杨文琦2. 基于自发漏磁检测的钢绞线两点腐蚀试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 74-81.
[2]	张华1，张正琦2 ，程高3，4，田伯科1. 黄土地区陡崖坡段桩基合理临坡距研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 93-98.
[3]	刘金春，宋子轩，梁栋. 单箱三室连续梁桥在横向温度梯度与汽车偏载下的空间效应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 80-86.
[4]	郑植1,2，耿波2，袁佩2，李嵩林2，胡正涛3. 桥墩复合材料防船撞装置新型连接试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 66-73.
[5]	张阳1，屈少钦1，卢九章2，霍文斌3. UHPC纤维定向法及对受拉性能影响[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 74-80.
[6]	傅立磊. 基于随机激励响应的参数识别相关函数法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 70-75.
[7]	苏小波1，肖林2. 空间刚架结构钢-混结合段合理构造模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 76-82.
[8]	梁宗保1，柴洁1，纳守勇2，马天立1，唐玉1. 基于深度学习的桥梁健康监测数据有效性分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 78-83.
[9]	王民1,2，尚飞1，肖丽1，包广志3. 钢桥面浇注式沥青铺装复合梁疲劳损伤规律分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 84-88.
[10]	唐启智1,辛景舟1,2,周建庭1,付雷1,3,张俊4. 基于时序分析的锈蚀RC拱损伤识别：仿真与验证[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(02): 69-77.
[11]	戎贤1,2，杨洪渭1，张健新1,2. 带钢端头的装配式混凝土梁柱中节点滞回性能试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(02): 78-82.
[12]	刘小会，许杨，陈思甜，徐略勤. 人行悬索桥地震响应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 65-71.
[13]	琚利平1，王银辉2，陆晓宏3，单继栋4. 行车落物作用下钢筋混凝土箱梁破坏形态分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 72-78.
[14]	王桢1,2，周建庭1,3，张劲泉1,4，吴海军1，吴月星1. 现浇分段长度对万吨级平转斜拉桥受力的影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 44-52.
[15]	郝宪武，舒鹏，郝键铭. 大跨度非对称悬索桥的静风稳定性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 53-59.