公路隧道改路堑对衬砌结构的安全影响分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2022.07.16

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (07): 104-111.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2022.07.16

公路隧道改路堑对衬砌结构的安全影响分析

韩风雷1,2，刘宗韩1,2，王益3，肖东辉4，秦臻1,2

(1. 省部共建山区桥梁及隧道工程国家重点实验室重庆交通大学，重庆 400074；2. 重庆交通大学土木工程学院，重庆 400074； 3. 重庆大学土木工程学院，重庆 400045； 4. 保利长大工程有限公司，广东广州 510620)

收稿日期:2020-12-03 修回日期:2021-05-19 发布日期:2022-07-25
作者简介:韩风雷（1987—），男，河南商丘人，副教授，博士，主要从事冻土与寒区工程方面的研究。E-mail：718859612@qq.com 通信作者：刘宗韩(1997—)，男，重庆人，博士研究生，主要从事冻土与寒区工程方面的研究。E-mail:403999421@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目（41801053）；重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0835)；重庆市教委科学技术研究项目（KJQN201800724）；四川省铁路产业投资集团公司科技项目（LH-HT-45）

Influence of Road Tunnel Transforming to Cutting on Safety of Lining Structure

HAN Fenglei1,2, LIU Zonghan1,2, WANG Yi3, XIAO Donghui4, QIN Zhen1,2

(1. State Key Laboratory of Mountain Bridge and Tunnel Engineering Jointly Built by the Ministry and the Province, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 4. Poly Changda Engineering Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510620, Guangdong, China)

Received:2020-12-03 Revised:2021-05-19 Published:2022-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究路堑开挖卸荷对运营隧道衬砌结构的安全影响，以某浅埋小净距隧道拆除改建公路路堑工程为背景，采用Drucker-Prager弹塑性本构模型，基于数值仿真，分析了路堑开挖卸荷下既有运营隧道衬砌结构变形、受力和安全系数的演变规律，提出了路堑开挖施工的安全影响分区。结果表明：受路堑开挖卸荷和围岩弹性抗力作用，隧道整体上浮且两边墙向内挤压，以竖向变形为主，最大位移在拱顶为36.77 mm。衬砌结构受拉区由仰拱向上逐渐扩展到拱顶，埋深20 m时拉应力达3.47 MPa，拱脚易出现应力集中。衬砌结构安全系数波动较大，拱脚位置安全系数最小值为1.91，尤其需加强对两洞拱脚位置的监测。参考规范及衬砌结构各指标计算值，采用计算残留埋深比划分了路堑施工对隧道安全影响的3个分区，并给出各分区施工建议。

关键词: 隧道工程；隧道拆除；路堑开挖卸荷；小净距隧道；衬砌结构；安全影响分区

Abstract: To study the safety impact of cutting excavation unloading on the lining structure of operating tunnels, the demolition of a shallowly-buried neighborhood tunnel to a highway cutting project was taken as the research background. The Drucker Prager elastic-plastic constitutive model was used to analyze the evolution law of the deformation, stress and safety factor of the existing operating tunnel lining structure under the cutting excavation unloading by numerical simulation, and the safety impact zoning of the excavation and construction of the cutting was proposed. The results show that under the action of cutting excavation unloading and elastic resistance of surrounding rock, the tunnel floats as a whole and the walls on both sides squeeze inward, mainly vertical deformation. The maximum displacement at the arch crown is 36.77 mm. The tension region of the lining structure gradually expands from the invert upward to the vault. When the buried depth is 20m, the tensile stress reaches 3.47 MPa, and the arch foot is prone to stress concentration. The safety coefficient of the lining fluctuates greatly, and the minimum safety coefficient of the arch foot position is 1.91. In particular, it is necessary to strengthen the monitoring of the arch foot position. Referring to the code and the calculated value of each index of lining structure, the calculated residual buried depth ratio is used to divide the three zones with the impact of cutting construction on tunnel safety, and the construction suggestions for each zone are given.

Key words: tunnel engineering; tunnel demolition; cutting excavation unloading; neighborhood tunnel; lining structure; safety impact zoning

中图分类号:

U459.2

韩风雷1,2，刘宗韩1,2，王益3，肖东辉4，秦臻1,2. 公路隧道改路堑对衬砌结构的安全影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(07): 104-111.

HAN Fenglei1,2, LIU Zonghan1,2, WANG Yi3, XIAO Donghui4, QIN Zhen1,2. Influence of Road Tunnel Transforming to Cutting on Safety of Lining Structure[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2022, 41(07): 104-111.

参考文献

［1］宋广晨. 路堑施工对邻近隧道安全影响的数值分析及防护研究［D］.长沙：中南大学, 2014.
SONG Guangchen. Protective Measures and Numerical Analysis for Safety of Adjacent Existing Tunnel during Cut Slope Construction ［D］.Changsha: Zhongnan
University, 2014.
［2］杜明庆, 张顶立, 王旭春, 等. 大断面隧道仰拱底鼓破坏模式［J］. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(10):292-301,358.
DU Mingqing, ZHANG Dingli, WANG Xuchun, et al. Failure modes of floor heave in large section tunnel invert ［J］. Journal of China Highway, 2018, 31(10): 292-301,358.
［3］沈雯, 沈蓉, 孙廉威. 超深基坑分区开挖对侧方地铁影响的实测分析［J］. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019,15(增刊1):354-360.
SHEN Wen, SHEN Rong, SUN Lianwei. Field monitoring and analysis on the influence of deep excavation on adjacent metro［J］.Chinese Journal of Underground Space
and Engineering, 2019, 15(Sup1): 354-360.
［4］ MENG Fanyan, CHEN Renpeng, WU Huaina, et al. Observed beha-viors of a long and deep excavation and collinear underlying tunnels in Shenzhen granite residual
soil［J］.Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 103: 1-13.
［5］王凯, 崔艳明, 邓丽华. 岩质基坑开挖对下方既有隧道变形影响分析［J］. 地下空间与工程学报, 2015, 11(增刊2):611-616.
WANG Kai, CUI Yanming, DENG Lihua. Analysis of impact of rock fo-undation pit excavation on deformation of above an existing tunnel unde-rneath［J］. Chinese
Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2015, 11(Sup2): 611-616.
［6］马相峰, 龚伦, 张致心, 等. 开挖与回填过程中隧道受力和承载拱效应研究［J］. 隧道建设, 2019, 39(增刊2):185-191.
MA Xiangfeng, GONG Lun, ZHANG Zhixin, et al. Study on tunnel stress and load-bearing arch effect during excavation and filling ［J］. Tunnel Construction, 2019, 39
(Sup2): 185-191.
［7］ KUSUI A, VILLAESCUSA E, FUNATSU T. Mechanical behaviour of scaled-down unsupported tunnel walls in hard rock under high stress ［J］.Tunnelling and
Underground Space Technology, 2016, 60: 30-40.
［8］徐日庆, 程康, 应宏伟, 等. 考虑埋深与剪切效应的基坑卸荷下卧隧道的形变响应［J］. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(增刊1):195-207.
XU Riqing, CHNEG Kang, YING Hongwei, et al. Deformation response of a tunnel under foundation pit unloading considering buried depth and shearing effect ［J］.Rock
and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(Sup1): 195-207.
［9］ ZHANG Zhiguo, ZHANG Mengxi, ZHAO Qihua. A simplified analysis for deformation behavior of buried pipelines considering disturbance effects of underground
excavation in soft clays ［J］.Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2015, 8(10): 7771-7785.
［10］孙克国, 仇文革, 王中平, 等. 高速公路改扩建工程对高铁隧道的近接施工影响［J］. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(5):70-76.
SUN Keguo, QIU Wenge, WANG Zhongping, et al. Study on approa-ching excavation influence between expanding projects of expressway and high speed railway tunnel
under operation state ［J］.Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science Edition), 2015, 45(5): 70-76.
［11］ YE Shuaihua, ZHAO Zhuangfu, WANG Denqun. Deformation analysis and safety assessment of existing metro tunnels affected by excavation of a foundation pit ［
J］. Underground Space, 2021, 6(14): 421-431.
［12］郑刚, 杜一鸣, 刁钰, 等. 基坑开挖引起邻近既有隧道变形的影响区研究［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(4):599-612.
ZHENG Gang, DU Yiming, DIAO Yu, et al. Influenced zones for deformation of existing tunnels adjacent to excavations ［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical
Engineering, 2016, 38(4):599-612.
［13］龚伦, 吴金霖, 梁振宁, 等. 上方挖方施工对既有隧道安全性影响研究［J］. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(增刊2): 249-254.
GONG Lun, WU Jinlin, LIANG Zhenning, et al. Study on the safety state of the excavation above the existing tunnels［J］.China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(Sup2):
249-254.
［14］仇文革, 孙克国, 郑强, 等. 隧道上方挖填方受初始埋深的影响分区研究［J］. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(增刊1):8-13.
［14］ QIU Wenge, SUN Keguo, ZHENG Qiang, et al. Study on influence di-vision of fill and excavation above tunnel by the initial depth ［J］.China Civil Engineering
Journal, 2017, 50(Sup1): 8-13.
［15］ SHI Chenghua, CAO Chengyong, LEI Mingfeng, et al. Effects of
lateral unloading on the mechanical and deformation performance of shield tunnel segment joints ［J］.Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016,51:175-188.
［16］翁承显, 刘东双. 基坑施工对近距地铁隧道安全性的影响［J］. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 51(1):110-113.
WENG Chengxian, LIU Dongshuang. The influence of foundation pit ex-cavation on the safety near subway tunnel［J］. Journal of Shan-dong Agricultural University (
Natural Science Edition ), 2020, 51(1):110-113.
［17］卜康正, 郑先昌, 沈翔, 等. 基坑放坡开挖对下方既有地铁隧道影响计算及风险预测［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(7):5-12.
BU Kangzheng, ZHENG Xianchang, SHEN Xiang, et al. Calculation for effect of foundation pit sloping excavation on underlying metro tunnels and risk prediction
［J］.China Work Safety Science and Technology, 2019, 15(7): 5-12.
［18］仇文革. 地下工程近接施工力学原理与对策的研究［D］.成都：西南交通大学, 2003.
QIU Wenge.The Study on Mechanics Principle and Countermeasure of Approaching Excavation in Underground Works［D］. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University,
2003.

[1]	夏才初1,2，陈钿浩1，李强3. 封闭和开放的单向冻结条件下饱和砂岩冻胀变形对比试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(09): 101-108.
[2]	赵宁雨1，2，吕陈伏1，陈弘杨1，胡诗林1. 高海拔长大隧道压入式施工通风的合理长度研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(03): 94-99.
[3]	曹正卯，张琦，陈建忠. 羊鹿山隧道20 MW火灾全射流纵向排烟全比尺试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(03): 123-128.
[4]	杨仲杰1，吴洁2，张俊儒3. 基于围岩二次应力特征的单跨四车道高速公路隧道合理高跨比的解析计算[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(03): 129-135.
[5]	孟凡琨，陈广交，巨永锋，杜凯. 公路养护施工中的交通控制与管理[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 32(1): 83-86.
[6]	李强, 郭军, 夏铃. 公路隧道衬砌火灾后力学行为分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010, 29(5): 693-696.
[7]	徐林生. 财神梁隧道台阶法开挖施工数值模拟研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 27(4): 548-551.
[8]	陈林杰, 蒋树屏, 丁浩. 公路隧道外水压力折减规律研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 27(3): 383-386,404.
[9]	高攀科, 徐林生. 公路连拱隧道中隔墙的若干技术问题[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 27(3): 396-399.
[10]	范小伟, 徐林生. 长冲隧道进口段开挖方法的优化分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 27(2): 225-227,289.
[11]	杨轸，郭忠印. 隧道路面抗滑性能测定及其对行车安全影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2006, 25(6): 38-42.
[12]	邓仁清. 范家岭隧道大坍方处理技术[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2006, 25(5): 37-39.
[13]	徐林生，李永林，程崇国. 公路隧道围岩变形破裂类型与等级的判定[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2002, 21(2): 16-20.
[14]	林志1，李佳奇1，赵耀2，陈梦婷2，苏培循1. 隧道路面颜色对行车安全的影响研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(07): 34-38.

公路隧道改路堑对衬砌结构的安全影响分析

Influence of Road Tunnel Transforming to Cutting on Safety of Lining Structure

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics