花椒箐软岩隧道变形规律与支护对策研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2023.03.06

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 44-51.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2023.03.06

• 交通+大数据人工智能 • 上一篇

花椒箐软岩隧道变形规律与支护对策研究

鲍先凯1，时睦涵1，雷彦宏2，张武1，王舒锐1

(1. 内蒙古科技大学土木工程学院，内蒙古包头 014010； 2. 中铁二十局集团第五工程有限公司，云南昆明 650200)

收稿日期:2021-12-06 修回日期:2022-01-26 发布日期:2023-05-11
作者简介:鲍先凯（1974—），男，内蒙古赤峰人，副教授，博士，主要从事岩土与地下工程方面的研究。E-mail：bxkzlm@163.com 通信作者：时睦涵（1995—），男，江苏连云港人，硕士研究生，主要从事岩土力学与地下工程方面的研究。E-mail：670544755@qq.com
基金资助:
内蒙古自然科学基金项目(2020LH05018)；内蒙古科技大学建筑科学研究所开放基金项目(JYSJJ-2021M19)

Deformation Law and Supporting Countermeasures of Huajiaoqing Soft Rock Tunnel

BAO Xiankai1, SHI Muhan1, LEI Yanhong2, ZHANG Wu1, WANG Shurui1

(1. School of Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, Inner Mongolia, China; 2. China Railway 20th Bureau Group No.5 Engineering Co., Ltd., Kunming 650200, Yunnan, China)

Received:2021-12-06 Revised:2022-01-26 Published:2023-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 软岩隧道施工过程中经常出现围岩挤出变形、衬砌变形侵限、支护结构断裂失稳等情况。以花椒箐软岩隧道为背景，运用数值分析软件模拟隧道环状开挖双台阶预留核心土法施工过程，分析变形机理并改进支护措施，采用“关键部位强化支护+高强锁脚锚杆支护+断面锚杆整体强化”新支护对策；模拟分析改进后支护效果，达到要求后予以采用，并进行现场变形监测。研究结果表明：花椒箐隧道变形是由两帮和拱脚的围岩在高应力影响下发生剪切破坏，导致了拱部整体下沉变形；模拟变形结果超出预警值，支护效果不佳；通过增加锚杆长度，增设锁脚锚杆等措施进行针对性优化；改进后模拟的拱顶、拱底、水平方向变形量较优化前分别减少了20.3%、15.2%、20%，均未超出预警值，优化效果显著；经现场监控量测验证表明，改进支护措施后，拱顶、拱肩和拱腰最大变形量分别为17、 3.67、3.02 cm，优化效果符合预期。

关键词: 隧道工程；支护优化；有限元分析；软岩隧道；变形监测

Abstract: During the construction of soft rock tunnel, there are often extrusion deformation of surrounding rock, deformation limit of lining, fracture and instability of support structure and so on. Taking Huajiaoqing soft rock tunnel as the background, the numerical analysis software was used to simulate the construction process of double step reserved core soil method for circular excavation of tunnel, analyze the deformation mechanism and improve the support measures. Moreover, the new support countermeasures of “strengthened support at key parts + high-strength locking anchor bolt support + overall reinforcement of section anchor bolt” was adopted. The support effect after improvement was simulated and analyzed, which would be adopted after meeting the requirements, and the on-site deformation monitoring was also carried out. The research results show that the deformation of Huajiaoqing tunnel is the overall subsidence deformation of the arch caused by the shear failure of the surrounding rock of two sides and arch foot under the influence of high stress. The simulated deformation results exceed the early warning value and the support effect is poor. Targeted optimization was carried out by increasing the length of anchor rods and adding foot locking anchor rods. The deformation of arch crown, arch bottom and horizontal direction after improvement is reduced by 20.3%, 15.2% and 20% respectively compared with that before optimization, which all doesn’t exceed the early warning value, and the optimization effect is remarkable. The field monitoring measurement shows that after improving the support measures, the maximum deformation of the arch crown, arch shoulder, and arch waist is 17 cm, 3.67 cm and 3.02 cm respectively, and the optimization effect meets expectations.

Key words: tunnel engineering; supporting optimization; finite element analysis; soft rock tunnel; deformation monitoring

中图分类号:

U456.3+1

鲍先凯1，时睦涵1，雷彦宏2，张武1，王舒锐1. 花椒箐软岩隧道变形规律与支护对策研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 42(3): 44-51.

BAO Xiankai1, SHI Muhan1, LEI Yanhong2, ZHANG Wu1, WANG Shurui1. Deformation Law and Supporting Countermeasures of Huajiaoqing Soft Rock Tunnel[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2023, 42(3): 44-51.

参考文献

［1］罗宁.深埋软岩大变形隧道开挖松动区研究［D］.成都：西南交通大学，2016：7-8.
LUO Ning. Research on Excavation Disturbed Zone of Deep-Buried Tunnel with Soft and Weak Surrounding Rock and Large Deformation［D］. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016: 7-8.
［2］王成虎，沙鹏，胡元芳，等.隧道围岩挤压变形问题探究［J］.岩土力学，2011，32(增刊2)：143-147.
WANG Chenghu, SHA Peng, HU Yuanfang, et al. Study on squeezing deformation problems during tunneling［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(Sup2): 143-147.
［3］李天斌，何怡帆，付弦.高地应力隧道施工期大变形动态风险评估方法及应用［J］.工程地质学报，2019，27(1)：29-37.
LI Tianbin, HE Yifan, FU Xian. Dynamic risk assessment method and application of large deformation of high ground stress tunnel during construction period ［J］. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2019, 27(1): 29-37.
［4］邹洋，李夕兵，周子龙，等.开挖扰动下高应力岩体的能量演化与应力重分布规律研究［J］.岩土工程学报，2012，34(9)：1677-1684.
ZOU Yang, LI Xibing, ZHOU Zilong, et al. Energy evolution and stress redistribution of high-stress rock mass under excavation distribution［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(9): 1677-1684.
［5］ AYDAN O, AKAGI T, KAWAMOTO T. The squeezing potential of rock around tunnel: Theory and prediction with examples taken from Japan［J］. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 1996, 29(3): 125-143.
［6］ TERZAGHI K. Rock defects and loads in tunnel supports［M］∥Rock Tunneling with Steel Supports. Youngstown, Ohio: The Commercial Shearing & Stamping Co., 2004: 17-99.
［7］ LI Guang, MA Fengshan, GUO Jie, et al. Study on deformation failure mechanism and support technology of deep soft rock roadway［J］. Engineering Geology, 2019, 264: 1-15.
［8］ ZHENG Lujing, ZUO Yujun, HU Yafei, et al. Deformation mechanism and support technology of deep and high-stress soft rock roadway［J］. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021(4): 1-14.
［9］ SUN Xiaoming, CHEN Feng, MIAO Chengyu, et al. Physical modeling of deformation failure mechanism of surrounding rocks for the deep-buried tunnel in soft rock strata during the excavation［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2018, 74: 247-261.
［10］蔡美峰.岩石力学与工程［M］.北京：科学出版社，2013：238-240.
CAI Meifeng. Rock Mechanics and Engineering［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 2013: 238-240.
［11］任兆丹.软岩隧道拉锚结构数值分析与支护机理研究［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版)，2020，39(3)：113-122.
REN Zhaodan. Numerical analysis and support mechanism study of anchor structure in soft rock tunnel ［J］. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2020, 39(3): 113-122.
［12］扈世民，张顶立，李鹏飞，等.大断面黄土隧道初期支护适应性研究［J］.岩土力学，2011，32(增刊2)：660-665.
HU Shimin, ZHANG Dingli, LI Pengfei, et al. Analysis of initial support adaptability of the large-section loess tunnel［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32 (Sup2): 660-665.
［13］李健.大断面黄土隧道初支作用机理及变形控制技术研究［D］.北京：北京交通大学，2012.
LI Jian. Initial Supporting Mechanism and Deformation Controlling Technology of Loess Tunnel with Large Section［D］. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2012.
［14］徐国元，黄思源.基坑开挖对下卧盾构隧道变形影响的计算分析［J］ .重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版)，2021，40(9)：78-85.
XU Guoyuan, HUANG Siyuan. Calculation and analysis of the influ-ence of foundation pit excavation on the deformation of the underlying shield tunnel ［J］. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2021, 40 (9): 78-85.
［15］潘岳，撒占友，贺可强.巷道围岩状态的等效应力等效应变表述［J］.岩土力学，2005，26(11)：1695-1699.
PAN Yue, SA Zhanyou, HE Keqiang. Expression on equivalent stress and equivalent strain of wall rock state of tunnel［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(11): 1695-1699.
［16］杜贝举，刘长友，吴锋锋，等.深井高应力软弱围岩巷道变形机理及控制研究［J］.采矿与安全工程学报，2020，37(6)：1123-1132.
DU Beiju, LIU Changyou, WU Fengfeng, et al. Deformation mecha-nism and control technology of roadway in deep mine with high stress and weak surrounding rock［J］. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2020, 37(6): 1123-1132.
［17］梁晓丹，刘刚，赵坚.地下工程压力拱拱体的确定与成拱分析［J］.河海大学学报(自然科学版)，2005，33(3)：314-317.
LIANG Xiaodan, LIU Gang, ZHAO Jian. Determination and analysis of arching action in underground rock engineering［J］. Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences), 2005, 33(3): 314-317.

花椒箐软岩隧道变形规律与支护对策研究

Deformation Law and Supporting Countermeasures of Huajiaoqing Soft Rock Tunnel

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics