行人主动安全系统对交通流运行状态影响分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2021.03.06

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (03): 34-42.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2021.03.06

• 交通+大数据人工智能 • 上一篇下一篇

行人主动安全系统对交通流运行状态影响分析

华珺1，孙智诚2，赵俊玮1，朱彤2,3

(1. 北京航空航天大学交通科学与工程学院，北京 100191； 2. 长安大学汽车学院，陕西西安 710064； 3. 长安大学汽车运输安全保障技术交通行业重点实验室，陕西西安 710064)

收稿日期:2019-05-22 修回日期:2019-10-22 出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-03-15
作者简介:华珺(1995—)，女，江苏常州人，博士研究生，主要从事交通安全方面的研究。E-mail：chd_hua@163.com
基金资助:
陕西省交通运输厅科技项目(15-12K)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(310822161005)

Influence Analysis of Pedestrian Active Safety System on Operation State of Traffic Flow

HUA Jun1, SUN Zhicheng2, ZHAO Junwei1, ZHU Tong2, 3

(1. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China; 2. School of Automobile, Changan University, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, China; 3. Key Laboratory for Automotive Transportation Safety Enhancement Technology of the Ministry of Communication, Changan University, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, China)

Received:2019-05-22 Revised:2019-10-22 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-03-15
Supported by:

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 行人主动安全系统能够有效降低人车碰撞风险，但其对交通流长时间运行状态的影响有待探究。运用Net Logo软件，基于智能体建模思想设置车辆和行人运动模式，选择平均车速波动情况和车辆等待时间、行人等待时间、行人速度分布评估传统车辆、行人检测系统车辆和人车通讯系统研究车辆运行时的交通流稳定性和通行效率。研究结果表明：行人主动安全系统在不同道路条件下的性能互有差异；行人检测系统的使用不利于交通流运行的稳定性；人车通讯系统的普及可能影响车辆通行效率，加剧城市拥堵。研究为驾驶人培训、自动驾驶车辆市场准入、道路设计和管理等方面提供思路。

关键词: 交通工程, 先进驾驶辅助系统, 行人保护, 交通流稳定性, 通行效率, Net Logo仿真平台

Abstract: Pedestrian active safety system can effectively reduce the risk of collision between pedestrians and vehicles, but its impact on the long-term operation state of traffic flow remains to be explored. Net Logo software was used to set the motion modes of vehicle agents and pedestrian agents based on the idea of agent-based modeling. The average vehicle speed fluctuation, vehicle waiting time, pedestrian waiting time and pedestrian speed distribution were selected to evaluate the traffic flow stability and traffic efficiency while traditional vehicles, vehicles with pedestrian detection system and vehicles with pedestrian-vehicle communication system were running. The results show that the pedestrian active safety system has different performances under different road conditions. The use of pedestrian detection systems is not conducive to the traffic flow stability. The popularity of pedestrian-vehicle communication systems may affect traffic efficiency and increase urban congestion. The study provides ideas for driver training, automatic driving vehicle market access, road design and management.

Key words: transportation engineering, advanced driving assistance system, pedestrian protection, traffic flow stability, traffic efficiency, Net Logo simulation platform

中图分类号:

U491

华珺1，孙智诚2，赵俊玮1，朱彤2,3. 行人主动安全系统对交通流运行状态影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 34-42.

HUA Jun1, SUN Zhicheng2, ZHAO Junwei1, ZHU Tong2, 3. Influence Analysis of Pedestrian Active Safety System on Operation State of Traffic Flow[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2021, 40(03): 34-42.

参考文献

［1］公安部交通管理局. 中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报（2017年度）［R］. 北京：人民交通出版社，2018.
Traffic Management Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security of China. Annual Statistics Report of China Road Traffic Collisions in 2017 ［R］. Beijing: China
Communications Press, 2018.
［2］ LENARDA J, ROMERO A B, DANTON R. Typical pedestrian accident scenarios for the development of autonomous emergency braking test protocols ［J］. Accident
Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 73(11): 73-80.
［3］ SILLA A, LEDEN L, RAMA P, et al. Can cyclist safety be improved with intelligent transport systems? ［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2017, 105(8):
134-145.
［4］ BELLA F, NATALE V, SILVESTRI M. Driver-pedestrian interaction under different road environments ［J］. Transportation Research Procedia, 2017, 27: 148-155.
［5］ SEARSON D J, ANDERSON R W G, HUTCHINSON T P. Integrated assessment of pedestrian head impact protection in testing secondary safety and autonomous emergency
braking ［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 63(2)3: 1-8.
［6］ ANAYA J J, MERDRIGNAC P, SHAGDAR O, et al. Vehicle to pedes-trian communications for protection of vulnerable road users ［C］∥ 2014 IEEE Intelligent
Vehicles Symposium Proceedings. Dearborn:［s.n.］,2014: 1037-1042.
［7］ DHONDGE K, SONG S, CHOI B Y, et al. Wifihonk: smartphone-based beacon stuffed Wi-Fi car2x-communication system for vulnerable road user safety ［C］∥IEEE
Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring). ［s.l.］:IEEE, 2014: 1-5.
［8］ HUSSEIN A, GARCIA F, ARMINGOL J M, et al. P2V and V2P communication for pedestrian warning on the basis of autonomous vehicles ［C］∥ 19th International
IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).［s.l.］:IEEE, 2016: 2034-2039.
［9］ LARGE D R, KIM H, MERENDA C, et al. Investigating the effect of urgency and modality of pedestrian alert warnings on driver acceptance and performance ［J］.
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 60(1): 11-24.
［10］ SARVESTANI A T, MAHJOUB H N, FALLAH Y P, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a cooperative vehicle-to-pedestrian safety application ［J］. IEEE
Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2017, 9(4): 62-75.
［11］ AZIZ H, UKKUSURI S V, HASAN S. Exploring the determinants of pedestrian-vehicle crash severity in New York City ［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention,
2013, 50: 1298-1309.
［12］潘兵宏, 赵一飞, 梁孝忠. 动视觉原理在公路线形设计中的应用［J］. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2004,24(6): 20-24.
PAN Binghong, ZHAO Yifei, LIANG Xiaozhong. Application of dynamic vision theory in highway alignment design ［J］. Journal of Changan University: Natural Science
Edition, 2004, 24 (6): 20-24.
［13］ TAHMASBI S A, MAHJOUB H N, FALLAH Y P, et al. Implemen-tation and evaluation of a cooperative vehicle-to-pedestrian safety application ［J］. IEEE
Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2017, 9(4): 62-75.
［14］ XIAO H, OUYANG S. Power control game in multisource multi-relay cooperative communication systems with a quality-of-service constraint ［J］. IEEE
Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2015, 16(1): 41-50.
［15］ SHEYKHFARD A, HAGHIGHI F. Performance analysis of urban drivers encountering pedestrian ［J］. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and
Behavior, 2019, 62(4): 160-174.
［16］ SUN J, LI T, LI F, et al. Analysis of safety factors for urban expressways considering the effect of congestion in Shanghai, China ［J］. Accident Analysis
and Prevention, 2016, 95: 503-511.
［17］ HALEEM K, ALLURI P, GAN A. Analyzing pedestrian crash injury severity at signalized and non-signalized locations ［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention,
2015, 81(8): 14-23.
［18］ LANGBROEK J, CEUNYNCK T D, DANIELS S, et al. Analyzing Interactions between Pedestrians and Motor Vehicles at Two-Phase Signalized Intersections — An
Explorative Study Combining Traffic Behavior and Traffic Conflict Observations in a Cross-National Context ［R］. Sweden: Lund University, 2012.
［19］马莹莹, 温沉, 陆思园. 无信号路段人行横道人车冲突概率估计［J］. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 39(1): 15-22.
MA Yingying, WEN Chen, LU Siyuan. Pedestrian-vehicle conflict probability estimation at uncontrolled crosswalks ［J］. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University
(Natural Science), 2020, 39(1): 15-22.
［20］ ELBADRAWI H R. A Computer Simulation Model for Single-Lane Roundabouts ［D］. Miami: Florida International University, 2000.
［21］ TIPALDO J M. Pedestrian-Vehicle Conflict Based Traffic Signal Warrant for Two Lane Crossing ［D］. Florida: Polytechnic University, 1999.
［22］ ZHENG Y, ELEFTERIADOU L. A model of pedestrian delay at unsignalized intersections in urban networks ［J］. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,
2017, 100(6): 138-155.
［23］ HUANG S, YANG J, EKLUND F. Evaluation of remote pedestrian sensor system based on the analysis of car-pedestrian accident scenarios ［J］. Safety Science,
2008, 46(11): 1345-1355.
［24］ MONTUFAR J, ARANGO J, PORTER M, et al. Pedestrians normal walking speed and speed when crossing a street ［J］. Transportation Research Record, 2007(1),
90-97.

[1]	唐继强1, 2，钟鑫伟2，刘健1，李天瑞3. 基于时间序列季节分类模型的轨道交通客流短期预测[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 31-38.
[2]	戚春华，王笑男，朱守林，李航天. 基于驾驶员视觉兴趣区域的交通工程设施信息量阈值研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 53-60.
[3]	邓天民1，朱杰2，朱凯家1，屈治华3. 基于iForest+Biscting K-means的驾驶风格辨识方法研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 1-6.
[4]	许茂增,张莉. 基于双射软决策理论的路段拥堵影响力识别[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 7-11.
[5]	王涛1，谢思红1，黎文皓1,2，李文勇1. 基于FFOS-ELM和PF的短时交通流自适应预测模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 21-27.
[6]	张诚1，汪成银1，陈志伟2，张正向3，张子磊3. 基于空间流量度的城市路网关键节点挖掘方法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 28-35.
[7]	王永岗，张衡，彭志鹏，周琬琦. 基于结构方程模型的出租车事故影响因素分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 36-42.
[8]	朱顺应，李维吉，林小媛，肖文彬，王红. 特色小镇游客车辆无复检管控点布设研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 52-58.
[9]	潘兵宏1,2，胡炜1，任卉1,单慧敏1. 基于TruckSim仿真下弯道货车侧滑速度模型研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 38-45.
[10]	吴文静，孙刃超，宗芳，贾洪飞. 居民低碳通勤出行的主观态度识别及影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 53-58.
[11]	李军，邓育新. 基于非负矩阵分解的出租车时空行为聚类分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 59-65.
[12]	成卫1，刘翔1，雷建明2. 基于RBF神经网络预测的交叉口信号周期时长优化[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 13-18.
[13]	史天亮，王文光. 信息观和粒子群算法在城市交通拥堵中的研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 19-25.
[14]	贺玉龙1,2，刘磊1,2，迟佳欣1,2. 高速公路车辆换道行为风险研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 26-33.
[15]	王露1，陈肖欣2，李华恩1. 大风雨雪气象条件下高速公路车辆稳定行驶的临界车速研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 34-40.

行人主动安全系统对交通流运行状态影响分析

Influence Analysis of Pedestrian Active Safety System on Operation State of Traffic Flow

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics