基于逆向多属性在线拍卖的运输服务采购机制

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2021.09.06

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (09): 36-42.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2021.09.06

• 交通+大数据人工智能 • 上一篇下一篇

基于逆向多属性在线拍卖的运输服务采购机制

王雅娟1,2，李敏1，邵嫄3

(1. 武汉科技大学恒大管理学院，湖北武汉 430081；2. 武汉科技大学服务科学与工程研究中心，湖北武汉 430081； 3. 广东金融学院工商管理学院，广东广州 510521)

收稿日期:2020-04-14 修回日期:2020-07-21 出版日期:2021-09-17 发布日期:2021-09-18
作者简介:王雅娟(1983—)，女，湖北武汉人，博士，副教授，主要从事拍卖机制设计理论及应用方面的研究。E-mail：wangyajuan@wust.edu.cn 通信作者：李敏(1995—)，女，湖北武汉人，硕士研究生，主要从事物流供应链管理方面的研究。E-mail：1053627120@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71601150，71501147)；湖北省教育厅哲学社会科学研究项目(19Q024)

Transportation Service Procurement Mechanism Based on Reverse Multi-Attribute Online Auction

WANG Yajuan1,2, LI Min1, SHAO Yuan3

(1.Evergrande School of Management, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, Hubei, China; 2. Research Center for Service Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, Hubei, China; 3. School of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou 510521, Guangdong, China)

Received:2020-04-14 Revised:2020-07-21 Online:2021-09-17 Published:2021-09-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对运输服务采购效率低，无法满足承运人即时运输的需求，笔者利用在线拍卖方法，基于运输时间、服务质量等多属性要求，对运输服务采购机制进行了研究，建立了以社会福利最大化为目标的机制模型，进而设计了逆向多属性在线拍卖的运输服务采购机制。研究结果表明：该机制不仅能实现托运人的即时决策，允许承运人随时获取运输服务，提高交易效率，而且能吸引承运人自愿参与拍卖，激励承运人披露真实的运输成本、运输时间、服务质量以及到达和离开时间，有助于实现运输服务公平、有效的分配。最后，通过算例演示了此机制在实际中的应用。所提机制为运输服务采购的实践提供了理论基础，方法指导和技术支撑。

关键词: 交通运输工程；运输服务采购；在线拍卖；多属性；激励相容；公平；有效

Abstract: In view of the low efficiency of transportation service procurement, which couldnt meet the needs of the carrier’s real-time transportation, the online auction method was used to study the transportation service procurement mechanism based on the multi-attribute requirements such as transportation time and service quality. The mechanism model with the goal of maximizing social welfare was established, and then the reverse multi-attribute online auction transportation service procurement mechanism was designed. The research results show that the proposed mechanism not only can realize the immediate decision-making of the shipper, allow the carrier to obtain transportation services at any time and improve transaction efficiency, but also can attract the carrier to participate in the auction voluntarily and encourage the carrier to disclose the real transportation cost, transportation time, service quality, arrival and departure time, which help to realize the fair and effective distribution of transportation services. Finally, an example is given to demonstrate the application of the proposed mechanism in practice. The proposed mechanism can provide theoretical basis, method guidance and technical support for the practice of transportation service procurement.

Key words: traffic and transportation engineering; transportation service procurement; online auction; multi-attribute; incentive compatibility; fair; effective

中图分类号:

U116.1

王雅娟1,2，李敏1，邵嫄3. 基于逆向多属性在线拍卖的运输服务采购机制[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(09): 36-42.

WANG Yajuan1,2, LI Min1, SHAO Yuan3. Transportation Service Procurement Mechanism Based on Reverse Multi-Attribute Online Auction[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2021, 40(09): 36-42.

参考文献

［1］潘灿辉, 李依蓉. 第三方物流的发展现状与趋势研究［J］. 中国市场, 2019(23): 160-161.
PAN Canhui, LI Yirong. Research on the development status and trend of the third party logistics［J］. Chinese Market, 2019(23): 160-161.
［2］卢安文, 刘佳奇. 物流服务供应链信息共享激励策略研究［J］. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(7): 228-232.
LU Anwen, LIU Jiaqi. Research on incentive strategy of information sharing in logistics service supply chain［J］. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019, 39
(7): 228-232.
［3］申笑宇, 宋炆倩. 不对称信息下考虑供应中断和延期交货的采购合同设计［J］. 工业工程, 2017, 20(2): 1-6.
SHEN Xiaoyu, SONG Wenqian. Procurementcontract design considering supply disruption and delay in delivery under asymmetric information［J］. Industrial Engineering
Journal, 2017, 20(2): 1-6.
［4］王江沄, 王緌. 柔性契约机制下外向型制造商的多阶段采购策略分析［J］. 工业工程, 2011, 14(3): 70-73.
WANG Jiangyun, WANG Rui. Analysis of multi-stage purchasing strategy for export-oriented manufacturers under flexible lease mechanism［J］. Industrial Engineering
Journal, 2011, 14(3): 70-73.
［5］ BRANCO F. The design of multidimensional auctions［J］. Rand Journal of Economics, 1997, 28(1): 63-81.
［6］ SHEFFI Y. Combinatorial auctions in the procurement of transporta-tion services［J］. Interfaces, 2004, 34(4): 245-52.
［7］李莉英.一种运输作业指派的迭代下降组合拍卖机制设计［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(2):267-273.
LI Liying. Design of an iterative descending combinatorial auction mechanism for transportation assignment［J］.Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural
Science), 2013,32(2):267-273.
［8］ HUANG G Q, XU S X. Truthful multi-unit transportation procure-ment auctions for logistics e-marketplaces［J］. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,
2013, 47: 127-148.
［9］ XU S X, HUANG G Q. Efficient multi-attribute multi-unit auctions for B2B e-commerce logistics［J］. Production & Operations Management, 2017, 26(2): 292-304.
［10］ LAVI R, NISAN N. Competitive analysis of incentive compatible online auctions［J］. Theoretical Computer Science, 2004, 310(1): 159-180.
［11］ MIYASHITA K. Online double auction mechanism for perishable goods［J］. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2014, 13(5): 355-367.
［12］王雅娟, 王先甲. 一种激励相容的多单位在线双边拍卖机制［J］. 管理科学学报, 2015, 18(8): 1-11.
WANG Yajuan, WANG Xianjia. Incentive compatible mechanism for multiunit online double auction［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2015, 18(8): 1-11.
［13］孙彬, 陈秋双. 基于多Agent的多式联运运输决策与动态协调［J］.计算机集成制造系统, 2013, 19(12): 3193-3201.
SUN Bin, CHEN Qiushuang. Transportation decision and dynamic coordination for multi-modal transport based on multi-agent system［J］. Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems, 2013, 19(12): 3193-3201.
［14］ ZHANG Juliang. An optimal efficient multi-attribute auction for transportation procurement with carriers having multi-unit supplies ［J］. Transportation Research
Part B: Methodological, 2019, 83: 249-260.
［15］李建章.密封拍卖和采购招标的比较静态分析［J］.重庆交通学院学报,2005(6):148-151.
LI Jianzhang. Comparative static analysis of sealed auction and procurement bidding［J］. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2005(6):148-151.

[1]	王海燕，安凯敏. 商品汽车整车运输方式选择的多属性决策模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 64-71.
[2]	刘澜1，2，张斯嘉1,荣腾凤1，张俊1. 高铁运输通道多式协调发展分析及对策——以云南高铁为例[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(01): 34-39.
[3]	宋成举1，张亚平2. 综合客运交通系统演化建模与求解[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(07): 102-106.
[4]	潘雨红，潘永飞，马旭. 基于EntropyTopsis方法的住宅预制构件的物流供应商选择[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 36(2): 101-107.
[5]	胡兴华, 唐热情, 韩东方. 重庆统筹城乡交通发展若干问题分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 27(6): 1131-1134,1167.
[6]	李建章. 不对称信息下道路运输市场管理中的最优激励机制[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2005, 24(5): 113-118.
[7]	李建章. 运输线路质量招投标中的监督博弈[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2003, 22(4): 89-92.
[8]	黄承锋, 杨秀苔, 李毅. 运输通道市场结构变动的静态博弈分析——以成渝通道客运为例[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2000, 19(4): 106-109.

基于逆向多属性在线拍卖的运输服务采购机制

Transportation Service Procurement Mechanism Based on Reverse Multi-Attribute Online Auction

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics