考虑位移影响的有限土体基坑土压力研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2022.01.14

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01): 96-102.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2022.01.14

• 交通基础设施工程 • 上一篇

考虑位移影响的有限土体基坑土压力研究

方焘1，冉井念1，刘春2，张婷1，徐翔1

(1. 华东交通大学江西省地下空间技术开发工程研究中心，江西南昌 330013； 2. 南昌铁路天河建设有限责任公司，江西南昌 330002)

收稿日期:2020-07-08 修回日期:2021-12-10 发布日期:2022-01-20
作者简介:方焘(1976—)，男，安徽安庆人，副教授，博士，主要从事基坑工程方面的研究。E-mail:fangtaolq@163.com 通信作者：冉井念（1996—），男(土家族)，重庆人，硕士研究生，主要从事基坑工程方面的研究。E-mail:1623065784@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51568021）

Soil Pressure of Finite Soil Mass Foundation Considering Displacement Effect

FANG Tao1, RAN Jingnian1, LIU Chun2, ZHANG Ting1, XU Xiang1

(1.Engineering Research & Development Centre for Underground Technology of Jiangxi Province, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, China; 2. Nanchang Railway Tianhe Construction Co., Ltd., Nanchang 330002, Jiangxi, China)

Received:2020-07-08 Revised:2021-12-10 Published:2022-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 经典土压力理论假定墙后为半无限土体，对于有限土体情况下的土压力问题不再适用。利用研制的土压力试验模型装置进行不同开挖深度的室内模型试验，采用微型土压力盒测量从静止到开挖稳定后的非极限状态的土压力分布变化，并在此基础上与理论计算方法进行对比，进一步分析有限土体情况下位移对土压力的影响规律。研究结果表明：有限土体情况下不考虑位移时，基坑有限土体侧桩后土压力曲线变化规律与半无限土体侧一致（处于非极限状态），桩后整体土压力比半无限土体侧大；有限土体侧桩体水平位移曲线变化特性与半无限土体相吻合，但桩体整体水平位移量比半无限土体侧小，其中有限土体侧最大位移量比半无限土体侧小45.16%；桩后有限土体土压力随着桩体水平位移增大而减小，这满足非极限状态下的土压力计算模型；考虑位移时，基坑两侧的土压力随着支护桩位移增大而减小，且有限土体侧的减小幅度小于半无限土体侧。

关键词: 岩土工程；有限土体；模型试验；非极限状态；土压力；桩体水平位移

Abstract: Since the classical earth pressure theory assumes that the soil behind the wall is a semi-infinite soil, it is no longer applicable to the problem of earth pressure in the case of finite soil. Using the developed earth pressure test model device, a set of indoor model tests with different excavation depths were carried out, and the earth pressure distribution change from a static state to a stable non-limiting state after excavation was measured by using a miniature earth pressure box. On this basis, it was compared with the theoretical calculation method to further analyze the influence of displacement on the earth pressure in the case of limited soil. The research results show that when the displacement is not considered in the case of finite soil, the change law of the soil pressure curve behind the side pile of the finite soil of the foundation pit is consistent with that of the semi-infinite soil side in a non-limiting state, and the overall earth pressure behind the pile is larger than that of the semi-infinite soil. the variation characteristics of the horizontal displacement curve of the finite soil side are consistent with those of the semi-infinite soil, but the overall horizontal displacement of the pile is smaller than that of the semi-infinite soil, and the maximum displacement of the finite soil side is 45.16% smaller than that of the semi-infinite soil. The soil pressure of the finite soil behind the pile decreases with the increase of the horizontal displacement of the pile, which satisfies the calculation model of the earth pressure under the non-limit state. When the displacement considered, the earth pressure on both sides of the foundation pit decreases with the increase degee of the displacement of the supporting piles, and the decrease of the finite soil side is smaller than that of the semi-infinite soil side.

Key words: geotechnical engineering; finite soil mass; model test; non-limiting state; soil pressure; horizontal displacement of pile

中图分类号:

TU470

方焘1，冉井念1，刘春2，张婷1，徐翔1. 考虑位移影响的有限土体基坑土压力研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(01): 96-102.

FANG Tao1, RAN Jingnian1, LIU Chun2, ZHANG Ting1, XU Xiang1. Soil Pressure of Finite Soil Mass Foundation Considering Displacement Effect[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2022, 41(01): 96-102.

参考文献

［1］中国建筑科学研究院.建筑基坑支护技术规程:JGJ 120—2012 ［S］．北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2012.
China Academy of Building Research.Technical Regulations for Building Foundation Pit Support:JGJ 120—2012［S］. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2012.
［2］ YUAN W, HAI W, WEN Z. Distribution of earth pressure on retaining wall ［J］. China Harbor Engineering, 2000,50(1):83-88.
［3］周含川. 有限土体主动土压力计算及探讨［J］. 重庆建筑, 2009,8(12):34-37.
ZHOU Hanchuan. Analytical study and discussion on active soil pressure from finite soil body ［J］.Chongqing Architecture,2009,8(12):34-37.
［4］肖昕迪, 李明广, 吴浩. 有限宽度土体主动土压力的离散元模拟研究［J］. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020,16(1):288-294.
XIAO Xindi, LI Mingguang, WU Hao. DEM simulation of earth pressure exerted on rigid retaining wall subjected to confined soil ［J］. Chinese Journal of Underground
Space and Engineering, 2020,16(1):288-294l
［5］张恒志, 徐长节, 梁禄钜, 等. RB模式下刚性挡墙有限土体主动土压力的离散元模拟与理论研究［J］. 岩土力学, 2021,42(10):2895-2907.
ZHANG Hengzhi, XU Changjie, LIANG Luju, et al. Discrete element simulation and theoretical study of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls under RB mode
for finite soils［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021,42(10):2895-2907.
［6］王崇宇, 刘晓平, 曹周红, 等. 刚性墙后有限宽度土体主动滑裂面特征试验研究［J］. 岩土力学, 2021,42(11):2943-2952.
WANG Chongyu, LIU Xiaoping, CAO Zhouhong, et al. Experi-mental study on characteristics of active slip surface of limited width soil behind rigid wall ［J］. Rock and
Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42 (11): 2943-2952.
［7］王崇宇, 刘晓平, 张家强, 等. 刚性墙后有限宽度土体被动滑裂面特征试验研究［J］. 岩土力学, 2021,42(7):1839-1849.
WANG Chongyu, LIU Xiaoping, ZHANG Jiaqiang, et al. Experimental study on passive slip surface of limited width soilbehind a rigid wall ［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics,
2021,42(7):1839-1849.
［8］吴志勇. 挡墙后有限宽度土体土拱效应分析及土压力计算方法研究［D］. 长沙：湖南大学, 2019.
WU Zhiyong. Soil Arch Effect Analysis and Earth Pressure Calculating Method Research of Soil with Limited Width behind the Retaining Wall ［D］. Changsha: Hunan
University, 2019.
［9］杨明辉, 吴志勇, 赵明华. 挡墙后有限宽度土体土拱效应分析及土压力计算方法［J］. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,47(3):19-27.
YANG Minghui, WU Zhiyong, ZHAO Minghua. Soil arch effect analysis and earth pressure aalculating method for finitewidth Soil behind retaining wall ［J］. Journal of
Hunan University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 47(3): 19-27.
［10］徐日庆, 徐叶斌. 考虑剪应力作用的有限土体被动土压力分析［J］. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,47(9):76-84.
XU Riqing, XU Yebin. Analysis of passive earth pressure for limited soils considering action of shear stress ［J］.Journal of Hunan University (Natural Science Edition),
2020,47(9):76-84.
［11］徐日庆, 徐叶斌, 程康, 等. 有限土体下考虑土拱效应的非极限主动土压力解［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2020,42(2):362-371.
XU Riqing, XU Yebin, CHENG Kang, et al. Method to calculate active earth pressure considering soil arching effect under non limit state of clay ［J］. Chinese Journal of
Geotechnical Engineering, 2020,42(2):362-371.
［12］吴雅峰, 许春虎, 陈昊. 考虑位移的加固护岸板桩桩侧土压力计算方法研究［J］. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,37（4):53-58.
WU Yafeng, XU Chunhu, CHEN Hao. Earth pressure calculation method of sheet pile for reinforcing revetment considering displacement ［J］. Journal of Chongqing
Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2018,37(4):53-58.
［13］杨明辉, 汪罗成, 赵明华. 考虑变形非线性影响的有限土体土压力计算模型［J］. 水利学报, 2012,43(9):1121-1126.
YANG Minghui, WANG Luocheng, ZHAO Minghua. A calculation model of the earth pressure for the limited soils considering the nonli-near influence of the displacement
［J］. Journal of Hydraulic Enginee-ring, 2012,43(9):1121-1126.
［14］ CASPE M S. Surface settlement adjacent to braced open cuts［J］. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1966,92（4）:51-59.

[1]	薛建荣，杨春景. 高速公路路基加宽桩网复合处理技术原理分析与数值模拟[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 33(3): 58-62.
[2]	祝晓寅，刘岩. 欠密实填土地基的工程危害及机理分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2003, 22(增刊1): 86-88.
[3]	唐红梅. 移民址区集成化综合测评系统及应用[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2002, 21(4): 106-109.
[4]	唐红梅. 三峡移民址区工程结构物优化工况布设技术研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2002, 21(3): 103-106.
[5]	白冰, 徐建平, 周健. 饱和软粘土地基沉桩过程中桩土挤压应力及超孔压计算[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2000, 19(3): 1-3,7.
[6]	王多银. 基础梁板的各种地基的近似统一模型探讨[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 1995, 14(2): 94-102.

考虑位移影响的有限土体基坑土压力研究

Soil Pressure of Finite Soil Mass Foundation Considering Displacement Effect

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics