地铁循环荷载作用下隧道周边软黏土动力响应特性研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2019.02.04

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 19-26.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2019.02.04

地铁循环荷载作用下隧道周边软黏土动力响应特性研究

蒲黍絛1，叶斌2，王海诚1，郭维祥1，陈再谦1

(1. 中国电建集团贵阳勘测设计研究院有限公司, 贵州贵阳 550081； 2. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系, 上海 200092)

收稿日期:2017-11-10 修回日期:2018-10-15 出版日期:2019-02-22 发布日期:2019-02-22
作者简介:蒲黍絛(1992—)，男，贵州铜仁人，工程师，主要从事地铁动力响应方面的研究。 E-mail: 997110232@qq.com。通信作者：叶斌(1977—)，男，上海人，副教授，博士，主要从事砂土液化方面的研究。E-mail: yebinmail@1977gmail.com。

Dynamic Response Characteristics of Soft Clay around Tunnel under Subway Cyclic Loads

PU Shutao1, YE Bin2, WANG Haicheng1, GUO Weixiang1, CHEN Zaiqian1

(1. Guiyang Survey Design & Research Institute Co. Ltd., Power Construction Corporation of China, Guiyang 550081, Guizhou, P. R. China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, P. R. China)

Received:2017-11-10 Revised:2018-10-15 Online:2019-02-22 Published:2019-02-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以上海地铁9号线为工程背景，在现场实测的基础上，采用计算程序DBLEAVES对地铁循环荷载作用下隧道周边软黏土的动力响应特性进行了研究。研究表明：在地铁循环荷载作用下，隧道周边软黏土的沉降规律为绕隧道向外弧形扩散，沉降值越来越小，直至影响范围边界，地表沉降呈沉降槽形式发展；最大沉降发生在隧道正下方，通过拟合得出土体的最终沉降量为19.8 mm；加速度响应方面，其空间分布形式同沉降规律，隧道右下方土体内的加速度及其衰减速度均略大于右上方土体；在循环荷载加载初期，土体内的超孔隙水压力上升很快，几乎呈线性发展；随着循环次数的增加，逐渐趋于稳定并向边界消散；超孔隙水压力比土体的有效应力小得多，隧道下方土体在循环荷载作用下不会发生液化现象。

关键词: 隧道工程, 地铁隧道, 循环荷载, 动力响应, 数值计算

Abstract: Based on the project of Shanghai Metro Line 9 and the filed measurement, a calculation program DBLEAVES was adopted to study the dynamic response characteristics of soft clay around tunnel under subway cyclic loads. The research results show that: under subway cyclic loads, the settlement law of soft clay around tunnel is arc spreading out around tunnel and the value is getting smaller and smaller until the boundary of influence. Ground settlement develops in the form of settlement trough. The largest settlement occurs directly below the tunnel and the final settlement of soil around tunnel is 19.8mm by fitting. In terms of acceleration response, the spatial distribution rule of acceleration response is the same as that of settlement. Acceleration and the decay rate of the right-bottom soil around tunnel are slightly larger than that of top-right soil. At the beginning of cyclic loads, excess pore water pressure of soil is rising quickly with nearly linear development and gradually intends to be stabilized and dissipated to the boundary with the increase of the number of cycles. Excess pore water pressure is much smaller than the effective stress of soil, so the liquefaction phenomenon will not happen below the tunnel under subway cyclic loads.

Key words: tunnel engineering, subway tunnel, cyclic loads, dynamic response, numerical calculation

中图分类号:

U451
TU435

蒲黍絛1，叶斌2，王海诚1，郭维祥1，陈再谦1. 地铁循环荷载作用下隧道周边软黏土动力响应特性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(02): 19-26.

PU Shutao1, YE Bin2, WANG Haicheng1, GUO Weixiang1, CHEN Zaiqian1. Dynamic Response Characteristics of Soft Clay around Tunnel under Subway Cyclic Loads[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2019, 38(02): 19-26.

参考文献

［1］ SEED H B, CHAN C K, MONISMITH C L. Effects of repeated loading on the strength and deformation of compacted clay［C］// Highway
Research Board Proceedings. Piscataway, N J: IEEE, 1955.
［2］ SEED H B, CHAN C K. Effect of stress history and frequency of stress application on deformation of clay subgrades under
repeated
loading［C］// Highway Research Board Proceedings. Piscataway, N J: IEEE, 1958.
［3］ LEE L K. Seismic Permanent Deformations in Earch Dams, Mechanies and Structures［D］. California: University of California
Los
Angles, 1974.
［4］ HOUSTON W N, HERRMANN H G. Undrained cyclic strength of marine soils［J］.J Geotech Engng Div ASCE, 1980, 106(6): 691-712.
［5］ YASUHARA K, HIRAO K, HYDE A F L. Effects of cyclic loading on undrained strength and compressibility of clay［J］. Soils &
Foundations, 1992, 32(1): 100-116.
［6］ YASUHARA K. Postcyclic undrained strength for cohesive soils［J］. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(11):1961-
1979.
［7］ MATSUI T, OHARA H, ITO T. Cyclic stress-strain history and shear characteristics of clay［J］. Journal of the Geotechnical
Engineering Division, ASCE, 1980, 106(10): 1101-1120.
［8］ AIREY D W, AL-DOURI R H, POULOS H G. Estimation of pile friction degradation from shear box tests［J］. Geotechnical Testing
Journal, 1992, 15(4): 5.
［9］周健, 屠洪权. 动力荷载作用下软黏土的残余变形计算模式［J］. 岩土力学, 1996,17(1):54-60.
ZHOU Jian, TU Hongquan. Residual deformation calculation model of soft clay under dynamic load［J］. Soil and Rock Mechanics,
1996,
17(1): 54-60.
［10］ KENNEY J T. Steady-state vibrations of beam on elastic foundation for moving load［J］. Journal of Applied Mechanics-
Transactions of the ASME, 1954, 21(4): 359-364.
［11］ CHAI J C, MIURA N. Traffic-load-induced permanent deformation of road on soft subsoil［J］. Journal of Geotechnical &
Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(11):907-916.
［12］边学成, 曾二贤, 陈云敏. 列车交通荷载作用下软土路基的长期沉降［J］. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(11):2990-2996.
BIAN Xuecheng, ZENG Erxian, CHEN Yunmin. Long-term settlement of soft soil subgrade［J］. Soil and Rock Mechanics, 2008, 29(11):
2990
-2996.
［13］ ZHANG F, YE B, NODA T, et al. Explanation of cyclic mobility of soils: approach by stress-induced anisotropy［J］. Soils &
Foundations, 2007, 47(4):635-648.
［14］ ASAOKA A, NAKANO M, NODA T. Super loading yield surface concept for highly structured soil behavior［J］. Journal of the
Japanese Geotechnical Society Soils & Foundation, 2000, 40(2): 99-110.
［15］ HASHIGUCHI K, CHEN Z. Elastoplastic constitutive equation of soils with the subloading surface and the rotational hardening
［J
］. International Journal for Numerical & Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2015, 22(3):197-227.
［16］ ZHANG F, YE B, YE G. Unified description of sand behavior［J］. Frontiers of Architecture & Civil Engineering in China,
2011,
5(2): 121-150.
［17］吕爱钟,蒋斌松,尤春安.位移反分析有限元网格划分范围的研究［J］.土木工程学报,1999,32(1):26-30.
LV Aizhong, JIANG Binsong, YOU Chunan. Study on range of mesh about finite element for back analysis of displacement［J］. China
Civil Engineering Journal, 1999, 32(1): 26-30.
［18］ MICHALTSOS G T. Dynamic behavior of a single-span beam subjected to loads moving with variable speeds［J］. Journal of
Sound &
Vibration, 2002, 258(2): 359-372.
［19］ MOORE I D, GUAN F. Three-dimensional dynamic response of lined tunnels due to incident seismic waves［J］. Earthquake
Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015, 25(4):357-369.
［20］ METRIKINE A V, POPP K. Steady-state vibrations of an elastic beam on a visco-elastic layer under moving load［J］. Archive
of
Applied Mechanics, 2000, 70(6): 399-408.
［21］ FRBA L. A rough assessment of railway bridges for high speed trains［J］. Engineering Structures, 2001, 23(5): 548-556.
［22］闫维明,张祎,任珉，等.地铁运营诱发振动实测及传播规律［J］.北京工业大学学报, 2006, 32(2):149-154.
YAN Weiming, ZHANG Yi, REN Min, et al. The measurement and propagation law of vibration induced by subway operation［J］. Journal
of
Beijing University of Technology, 2006, 32(2): 149-154.
［23］上海申通地铁集团有限公司. 9号线醉白池振动测试和分析报告［R］. 上海: 上海申通地铁集团有限公司，2013.
Shanghai Shen Tong Rail Transportation Research Consulting Co., Ltd. Vibration Test and Analysis Report of Line 9 in Zuibaichi［R
］.
Shanghai: Shanghai Shen Tong Rail Transportation Research Consulting Co., Ltd., 2013.
［24］ ZHANG Y, LIU W, ZHANG Y, et al. Analysis of effect of track structural parameters on dynamic responses of ground due to
metro
train［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics & Engineering, 2006, 25(5): 1009-1014.

[1]	秦海洋1，汤永净1,2，陈智远3. 基于CATIA的BIM技术在隧道设计中的应用[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 82-87.
[2]	代昱昊，王华，彭桂彬. 基于TEM的玉磨铁路隧道渗漏水状态预测方法研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 88-92.
[3]	苏兴矩. 浅埋偏压隧道半明拱进洞设计分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 112-116.
[4]	韦猛，方中杨，柴冰冰，亓金慧. 砂卵石地层盾构隧道地表最大沉降量预测[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 110-115.
[5]	张世豪1，李彤2,3,4,，李璇5，郝保安1，石春1. 花岗岩地层中盾构掘进效率影响因素研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 105-111.
[6]	谭绪凯1,2，高峰1,2，徐伟1，罗兴1. 地震作用下隧道工程失稳判定方法探讨[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 108-115.
[7]	种玉配1，齐燕军2，刘书奎2. PVC管聚能爆破法在水平砂泥岩隧道中的应用[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 116-120.
[8]	蒋加兵1，陈子龙2，徐涛3. 饱和砂层泥水平衡盾构隧道开挖面稳定研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(02): 95-100.
[9]	李志勇，黄桦. 基于明色铺装对隧道照明质量的研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(02): 101-107.
[10]	曹力桥1，王志斌2，周丁恒3. PBA车站扣拱施工顺序对上部跨河桥沉降影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 79-86.
[11]	武周虎. 一种新型异形椭圆隧道横断面的性质及优化设计[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 87-95.
[12]	李英帅1，王卫杰1，王茂盛2. 城市隧道照明优化设计研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(11): 76-80.
[13]	丁浩1,2，刘鹏1，马非2，夏杨于雨2，李钰1. 公路隧道非对称配光照明质量分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(10): 54-59.
[14]	张霄，尹占超，刘啸，段崇豪，郝彭帅. 综合物探法在运营岩溶隧道病害探查中的应用[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(10): 60-66.
[15]	王超1，周磊生2，徐润1，宋杰1. BIM施工综合管理平台在隧道工程中的应用研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(09): 74-79.

地铁循环荷载作用下隧道周边软黏土动力响应特性研究

Dynamic Response Characteristics of Soft Clay around Tunnel under Subway Cyclic Loads

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics