沥青路面层间接触状态研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2019.08.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 沥青路面层间接触状态不仅对道路结构力学响应影响显著，而且也是路面结构力学行为研究的瓶颈。为促进路面力学研究的发展，系统梳理了沥青路面层间接触学术研究现状、热点前沿、存在问题及发展前景，对不同情况下层间接触状态分析及层间接触状态的保持进行分析。首先总结了基于试验方法和数值模拟手段的层间接触研究方法并进行统计分析，重点介绍国内外有关层间接触经典试验方法及其表征指标；其次针对层间接触的表征进行综述，重点就目前应用最广泛的7种层间接触的表征方式进行分析，并就各种表征的优缺点进行详细剖析；最后结合沥青路面层间接触发展动向，提出了展望，以期为复杂条件影响下的道路结构力学行为的学术研究提供新的视角和基础资料。

关键词: 道路工程, 层间接触状态, 试验, 表征

Abstract: The interlayer contact state of asphalt pavement not only has a significant influence on the mechanical response of road structure, but also is the bottleneck of the study of pavement structure mechanics behavior. In order to promote the development of pavement mechanics research, the academic research status, hot spots, problems and development prospects of asphalt pavement interlayer contact state were systematically reviewed. The analysis on the interlayer contact state and the maintenance of interlayer contact state under different conditions was carried out. Firstly, the interlayer contact research methods based on the test method and the numerical simulation method were summarized and the statistical analysis was carried out. The classical test methods and characterization indices of interlayer contact at home and abroad were mainly introduced. Secondly, the characterization of interlayer contact was reviewed. Emphasis was laid on the analysis of the seven most widely used methods of characterization of interlayer contact, and the advantages and disadvantages of various characterizations were analyzed in detail. Finally, the development trend of asphalt pavement interlayer contact was put forward, in order to provide a new perspective and basic information for the academic research on the mechanical behavior of road structure under the influence of complex conditions.

Key words: highway engineering, interlayer contact state, test, characterization

中图分类号:

U416.2

冉武平，张玉，李爽. 沥青路面层间接触状态研究进展[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(08): 45-52.

RAN Wuping, ZHANG Yu, LI Shuang. Research Progress on Interlayer Contact State of Asphalt Pavement[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2019, 38(08): 45-52.

参考文献

［1］ KRUNTCHEVA M R, COLLOP A C, THOM N H. Effect of bond condition on flexible pavement performance ［J］. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2005, 131(11): 880
-888.
［2］ UZAN J, LIVNCH M, ESHED Y. Investigation of adhesion properties between asphaltic-concrete layers ［J］. Asphalt Paving Technol, 1978 (47):495-521.
［3］ HASSAN F A, GHAIBEH A S. Evaporation and salt movement in soils in the presence of water table［J］. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1977, 41(3):
470-478.
［4］关昌余, 王哲人, 郭大智. 路面结构层间结合状态的研究［J］. 中国公路学报, 1989, 2(1): 70-80.
GUAN Changyu, WANG Zheren, GUO Dazhi. A study of conditions of interfaces in pavement layers ［J］. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 1989, 2(1): 70-80.
［5］严二虎,沈金安. 半刚性基层与沥青层之间界面条件对结构性能的影响［J］.公路交通科技,2004,21(1):38-41.
YAN Erhu,SHEN Jinan.Structural influence of boundary condition between asphalt layer and semi-rigid base［J］. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and
Development, 2004,21(1):38-41.
［6］刘丽. 沥青路面层间处治技术研究［D］. 西安：长安大学,2008.
LIU Li.Study on the Technlogy Performance of Asphalt Pavement Layer Interfaces［D］. Xian:Changan University,2008.
［7］胡小弟, 孙立军. 沥青路面车辆超载定义分析［J］. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,35(12):1612-1616.
HU Xiaodi,SUN Lijun.Definition analysis of vehicle overload acting on asphalt pavement［J］. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2007,35(12):1612-1616.
［8］董泽蛟, 柳浩, 谭忆秋, 等.沥青路面三向应变响应现场实测研究［J］. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,37(7):46-51.
DONG Zejiao,LIU Hao,TAN Yiqiu, et al.Field measurement of three-direction strain response of asphalt pavement［J］.Journal of South China University of Technology
(Natural Science Edition) ,2007,37(7):46-51.
［9］董泽蛟, 谭忆秋, 欧进萍. 三向非均匀移动荷载作用下沥青路面动力响应分析［J］. 土木工程学报, 2013，46(6):122-130.
DONG Zejiao,TAN Yiqiu,OU Jinping.Dynamic response analysis of asphalt pavement under three-directional nonuniform moving load ［J］. China Civil Engineering
Journal , 2013,46(6):122-130.
［10］胡耀强, 黄钦寿. 层间接触状态变化对应力强度因子的影响分析［J］. 西部交通科技, 2016(5):10-12.
HU Yaoqiang,HUANG Qinshou. Analysis of the impact of interlayer contact state change on stress intensity factor ［J］. Western Transportation Science and
Technology, 2016(5):10-12.
［11］刘富强. 车水耦合作用下不同层间接触状态沥青路面性能研究［D］. 兰州:兰州交通大学,2017.
LIU Fuqiang. Research of Asphalt Pavement Performance with Layers Under Different Contacting Statement Under the Coupled Moisture-Loading Action［D］ . Lanzhou
:Lanzhou Jiaotong University,2017.
［12］罗要飞, 张争奇, 杨博,等. 层间接触条件对沥青路面结构性能的影响［J］. 中外公路, 2015, 35(5):109-114.
LUO Yaofei, ZHANG Zhengqi, YANG Bo, et al. Influence of interlayer contact conditions on structural performance of asphalt pavement ［J］.China Foreign Highway,
2015, 35(5): 109-114.
［13］刘鹏程,翁兴中,张广显,等. 层间接触对环氧沥青混凝土复合道面结构性能的影响［J］.材料导报B(研究篇), 2015, 29(6):139-144.
LIU Pengcheng,WENG Xingzhong,ZHANG Guangxian,et al. Effect of interlayer contact condition on epoxy asphalt concrete composite pavement structure ［J］. Materials
Review B( Research Papers), 2015, 29(6):139-144.
［14］郑仲浪.重载车辆作用下沥青路面层间力学行为研究［D］. 西安：长安大学,2010.
ZHENG Zhonglang. Study on Interfacial Mechanical Behavior of Asphalt Pavement Under Heavy Vehicle Loading ［D］.Xian: Changan University, 2010.
［15］ DONOVAN E, ALQADI I, LOULIZI A. Optimization of tack coat application rate for geocomposite membrane on bridge decks ［J］. Transportation Research Record,
2000 (1740):143-150.
［16］ DIAKHATE M, PHELIPOT A, MILLIEN A, et al. Shear fatigue behaviour of tack coats in pavements ［J］. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2006, 7(2): 201-222.
［17］ CANESTRARI F, FERROTTI G, PARTL M N, et al. Advanced testing and characterization of interlayer shear resistance ［J］. Journal of the Transportation
Research Board, 2005, 1929(1): 69-78.
［18］胡力群, 胡敏玲, 翁优灵. 沥青面层层间黏结力测定方法［J］.山西交通科技, 2005 (4): 1-3.
HU Liqun, HU Minling, WENG Youling. The test methods of road layer adhesion strength［J］.Shanxi Science ＆ Technology of Communications, 2005 (4): 1-3.
［19］ ARULRAJAH A, RAHMAN M A, PIRTHEEPAN J, et al. Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials
using a modified large-scale direct shear testing apparatus［J］. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2014,26(5):178-186.
［20］崔鹏, 李宇峙, 张莉, 等. 采用便携式剪切仪研究超薄白色罩面的层间抗剪性能［J］. 中南公路工程, 2006, 31(3): 34-37.
CUI Peng, LI Yuzhi, ZHANG Li, et al. Research on shearing property at the intersection of ultra-thin whitetopping by utilizing portable shearing device［J］.
Central South Highway Engineering, 2006, 31(3): 34-37.
［21］ GOODMAN R E , TAYLOR R L , BREKKE T L . Closure on a model for the mechanics of jointed rock ［J］. Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Division, 1970,
94:637-660.
［22］李东华. 沥青路面层间接触的评价［J］. 中外公路, 2005, 25(5):38-41.
LI Donghua. Evaluation of interlayer contact of asphalt pavement ［J］. China Foreign Highway, 2005, 25(5): 38-41.
［23］薛亮, 张维刚, 梁鸿颉. 考虑层间不同状态的沥青路面力学响应分析［J］. 沈阳建筑大学学报( 自然科学版), 2006, 22(4): 575-578.
XUE Liang, ZHANG Weigang, LIANG Hongjie.The mechanical response analysis of asphalt pavement in different interface condition between layers ［J］. Journal of
Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science), 2006, 22(4): 575-578.
［24］冯德成,宋宇.沥青路面层间结合状态试验与评价方法研究［J］.哈尔滨工业大学学报,2007, 39(4):627-631.
FENG Decheng,SONG Yu.Study of text and evaluation method on interfacial combining state of asphalt pavement［J］. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2007,
39(4):627-631.
［25］柳浩, 谭忆秋, 宋宪辉, 等.沥青路面基-面层间结合状态对路面应力响应的影响分析［J］. 公路交通科技, 2009, 26(3):1-6.
LIU Hao, TAN Yiqiu, SONG Xianhui, et al. Influence of bonding state of the asphalt pavement on the pavement stress response［J］. Journal of Highway and
Transportation Research and Development, 2009, 26(3):1-6.
［26］朱俊, 李亚卓, 陈玮,等. 不同层间接触状态下的沥青路面结构力学响应分析［J］. 中国水运月刊, 2013, 13(12):312-314.
ZHU Jun, LI Yazhuo, CHEN Wei, et al. Mechanical response analysis of asphalt pavement structure under different layer contact conditions ［J］. China Water
Transport Monthly, 2013, 13(12): 312-314.
［27］张久鹏,武书华,裴建中,等.基于剪切弹性柔量的基-面层间接触状态及路面力学响应分析［J］.公路交通科技,2013,30(1) :6-11+16.
ZHANG Jiupeng,WU Shuhua,PEI Jianzhong,et al.Analysis of interlayer contact condition between base and mechanical response of asphalt pavement and surface course
based on shear elastic compliance［J］.Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2013,30(1) :6-11+16.
［28］赵孝辉.考虑层间接触状态的路面结构有限元分析［D］. 广州：华南理工大学,2011.
ZHAO Xiaohui.Finite Element Analysis of Pavement Structure Considering Conditions Between Layers ［D］.Guangzhou: South China University of Technology,2011.
［29］莫雄,吴昌霞,吴冬兰.基层间层间接触状态对沥青路面结构受力的影响分析［J］.西部交通科技, 2014(3):23-28.
MO Xiong,WU Changxia,WU Donglan.Analysis on the impact of contact state between base layers on asphalt pavement structure stress［J］.Western China Communications
Science ＆ Technology, 2014(3):23-28.

[1]	王宗建1,2，李畅1，肖亮2，卢谅2. 加筋黏性土加筋效果的三轴试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 99-106.
[2]	张淑宝. 一种中央分隔带分离式改进混凝土护栏的研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 107-111.
[3]	赵伟. 纳米蒙脱石/SBS复掺改性沥青性能试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 118-122.
[4]	郭鹏1，陈思贤1，曹志国1，刘俊1，孟建玮2，鲜江林3. 复配废机油再生剂的制备及性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 87-91.
[5]	肖庆一1,2，赵鹏1，孙博伟3，张怡4，丁啸5. 废植物油再生沥青结合料性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 92-98.
[6]	何丽红1,2,温仙仙1,2,侯艺桐1,2,邓稳1,2. 阴离子乳化沥青粒径大小及分布影响因素分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 99-104.
[7]	姚爱玲1，王军伟2，许敏3，杨孟乾4，杨涛1. 水泥稳定碎石基层沥青路面隆起开裂数值分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 105-111.
[8]	郑植1,2，耿波2，袁佩2，李嵩林2，胡正涛3. 桥墩复合材料防船撞装置新型连接试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 66-73.
[9]	赵全满，任瑞波，刘瑶，李志刚，户桂灵. 城市道路检查井井周路面破坏机理[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 87-94.
[10]	王志祥1,2，李建阁1，陈楚鹏2. 基于变权重评价的沥青路面使用性能灰色预测[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 95-101.
[11]	肖庆一1，2，3，封仕杰1，孙立东1，陈向伟1. 碱渣掺量对不同龄期下半刚性再生基层力学性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 102-109.
[12]	曹源文1，陈作1，赵江2，张晓强3，郑婷婷4. 多路况下轮式装载机行驶稳定性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 140-146.
[13]	傅立磊. 基于随机激励响应的参数识别相关函数法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 70-75.
[14]	潘兵宏1，2，任卉2，单慧敏1，霍永富1. 客货分离整体式路基互通出口同分带开口长度研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 83-90.
[15]	孔令云1，邹胜楠1，黄麟钬2，吴海鹰3，余苗1，杨博1. 复合式路面疲劳裂纹扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 91-97.