钢管混凝土劲性骨架拱桥混凝土外包过程非线性屈曲分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2021.10.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 劲性骨架拱桥混凝土外包阶段结构稳定性的准确把握是保障桥梁施工安全的关键。为了研究大跨径钢管混凝土劲性骨架拱桥混凝土外包过程稳定性，以某主跨为600 m的劲性骨架拱桥为研究对象，分析了混凝土外包施工过程中的劲性骨架拱的非线性屈曲行为，探究了几何非线性、材料非线性对主拱稳定性的影响；确定了可能发生局部失稳的构件，从稳定性机理出发确定构件失稳原因并提出稳定性加强措施。研究结果表明：随着外包混凝土的浇筑，主拱双重非线性表现地越来越明显，且结构的整体失稳之前部分构件可能已经出现了局部失稳；劲性骨架拱桥稳定性分析必须同时计入材料、几何非线性，否则会高估其稳定极限承载力，但只进行双重非线性分析可能不容易找到结构潜在的局部失稳的薄弱构造，为了更为清晰的认识主拱结构加载过程中的失稳机理，有必要仅分析材料非线性条件下结构受力行为的演化过程；主拱混凝土外包过程中靠近拱脚位置的横撑腹杆可能发生局部失稳的现象，增强横撑腹杆侧向支承能有效加强横撑腹杆稳定性。

关键词: 桥梁工程；劲性骨架拱；稳定；施工阶段；材料非线性；局部失稳

Abstract: The accurate grasp of structural stability of concrete encasement stage of arch bridge with stiff skeleton has become the key to ensure its construction safety. In order to study the stability of long-span CFTS arch bridge with stiff skeleton in the concrete encasement process, a 600 m main span arch bridge with stiff skeleton was taken as an example, and the nonlinear buckling behavior of the stiff skeleton arch during the concrete encasement process was analyzed. Besides, the influence of geometric nonlinearity and material nonlinearity on the stability of main arch was also explored. The components that may suffer from local instability problem were discovered, and the causes of component instability were determined on the basis of the stability mechanism; moreover, the stability strengthening measures were put forward. The research results show that with the pouring of outer concrete, the double nonlinear performance of main arch becomes more and more obvious. Before the overall instability of the structure, some members may have been locally unstable. Both material nonlinearity and geometric nonlinearity must be taken into account in stability analysis of stiff skeleton arch bridge. Otherwise, the ultimate bearing capacity will be overestimated. However, it may not be easy to find the weak structure of potential local instability of the structure only by double nonlinear analysis. In order to more clearly recognize the instability mechanism of main arch structure during the loading process, it is necessary to analyze the evolution process of the structural stress behavior under the condition of material nonlinearity. In the concrete encasement process of main arch, the cross brace web near the arch foot may be locally unstable. Strengthening the lateral support of the transverse bracing web members can effectively enhance the stability of the transverse web members.

Key words: bridge engineering; arch bridge with stiff skeleton; stability; construction stages; material nonlinear; local instabi

中图分类号:

U441.3

郭增伟，程皓，周水兴. 钢管混凝土劲性骨架拱桥混凝土外包过程非线性屈曲分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(10): 52-62.

GUO Zengwei, CHENG Hao, ZHOU Shuixing. Nonlinear Buckling Analysis of Concrete Encasement Process of Arch Bridge with CFST Stiff Skeleton[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2021, 40(10): 52-62.

参考文献

［1］彭诗文. 大跨度劲性骨架混凝土拱桥节段施工受力过程分析［D］.成都: 西南交通大学, 2018.
PENG Shiwen. Force Analysis on Large Span Stiff Skeleton Concrete Arch Bridge during Segment Construction［D］. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018.
［2］郑皆连. 大跨径拱桥的发展及展望［J］. 中国公路, 2017(13): 40-42.
ZHENG Jielian. Development and prospect of long span arch bridge［J］. China Highway, 2017(13): 40-42.
［3］ ZHENG Jielian, WANG Jianjun. Concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges in China［J］. Engineering, 2018, 4(1): 143-155.
［4］ LUO Kai, PI Yonglin, GAO Wei, et al. Investigation into long-term behavior and stability of concrete-filled steel tubular arches［J］. Journal of Constructional Steel
Research, 2015, 104: 127-136.
［5］顾安邦, 刘忠, 周水兴. 万县长江大桥混凝土时效和几何材料等非线性因素影响分析［J］. 重庆交通学院学报, 1999,(4):1-7.
GU Anbang, LIU Zhong, ZHOU Shuixing. Analysis of concrete aging and geometrical and material nonlinear factors of Wanxian Yangtze River Bridge［J］.Journal of
Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Sciences), 1999, (4): 1-7.
［6］王业飞, 蔡金标, 杨国静. 劲性骨架混凝土拱桥施工稳定性分析［J］.桥梁建设, 2011(3): 22-25.
WANG Yefei, CAI Jinbiao, YANG Guojing. Analysis of stability of steel-frame reinforced concrete arch bridge at construction stage［J］.Bridge Construction, 2011(3): 22-25.
［7］ XU L, WU Y P. Nonlinear stability analysis of Qijiadu long-span deck-type CFST arch bridge［J］.Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 163-167: 1685-1691.
［8］ WANG J, GUO J. Analysis of influence factors and stability of concrete-filled steel tube arch bridge［J］.IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,
2020, 768(3): 032053
［9］陆新民, 姜军, 孙胜江, 等. 钢管混凝土劲性骨架拱桥施工稳定性分析［J］. 公路, 2010, (2): 51-54.
LU Xinmin, JIANG Jun, SUN Shengjiang, et al. Construction stability analysis of reinforced skeleton arch bridge with CFST tube［J］. Highway, 2010, (2): 51-54.
［10］ GENG Y, RANZI G, WANG Y T, et al. Out-of-plane creep buckling analysis on slender concrete-filled steel tubular arches［J］. Journal of Constructional Steel
Research, 2018, 140: 174-190.
［11］李立锋, 王连华. ANSYS土木工程实例详解［M］. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2015.
LI Lifeng, WANG Lianhua. ANSYS Civil Engineering Examples in Detail［M］. Beijing: Posts & Telecon Press, 2015.
［12］朱慈祥. CFST 拱桥稳定计算及相关参数分析［D］. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2008.
ZHU Cixiang. Stability Calculation and Related Parameter Analysis of CFST aArch Bridge［D］. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2008.
［13］于洪刚, 葛耀君, 张伟, 等. 大跨度钢管混凝土拱桥静风稳定性计算分析［J］. 桥梁建设, 2007(2): 32-34.
YU Honggang, GE Yaojun, ZHANG Wei, et al. Calculation and analysis of static wind stability of long span concrete-filled steel tube arch bridge［J］. Bridge Construction,
2007(2): 32-34.
［14］叶列平. 混凝土结构［M］. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2005.
YE Lieping.Concrete Structure［M］. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2005.
［15］陈宝春, 陈友杰, 王来永, 等. 钢管混凝土偏心受压应力-应变关系模型研究［J］. 中国公路学报, 2004, (1): 28-32.
CHEN Baochun, CHEN Youjie, WANG Laiyong, et al. Study of stress-strain relation of concrete-filled steel tubular eccentric compression column［J］. China Journal of
Highway and Transport, 2004, (1): 28-32.
［16］陈宝春, 秦泽豹, 彦坂熙, 等. 钢管混凝土拱(单圆管)面内受力双重非线性有限元分析［J］. 铁道学报, 2003, (4): 80-84.
CHEN Baochun, QIN Zebao, YAN Banxi, et al. Analysis of concrete filled steel tubular (single tube) arch subjected to in-plane loads by nonlinear finite element method［J
］.Journal of the China Railway Society, 2003, (4): 80-84.
［17］林嘉阳. 钢管混凝土(单圆管)单肋拱空间受力研究［D］. 福州: 福州大学, 2004.
LIN Jiayang. Research of Space-Load of CFST (Single Tube) Single-Rib Arches［D］. Fuzhou: Fuzhou University, 2004.
［18］钟善桐. 钢管混凝土结构［M］. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2003:48-64.
ZHONG Shantong. Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Structure［M］. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2003: 48-64.
［19］杨永清. 钢管混凝土拱桥横向稳定性研究［D］. 四川: 西南交通大学, 1998.
YANG Yongqing. Study on Transverse Stability of Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Arch Bridge［D］. Sichuan: Southwest Jiaotong University, 1998.
［20］张敏,许诺,周琳淇,等. 垫塞钢板对扣索力与主拱线形的影响分析［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 39(6): 53-58, 65.
ZHANG Min, XU Nuo, ZHOU Linqi, et al. Influence of inserting steel plates on the cable force and alignment of main arch［J］.Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University
(Natural Sciences), 2020, 39(6): 53-58, 65.
［21］郭彦林,郭宇飞,窦超. 钢管桁架拱平面内失稳与破坏机理的数值研究［J］. 工程力学, 2010, 27(11): 46-55, 63.
GUO Yanlin, GUO Yufei, DOU Chao. Numerical study on stability behavior and failure mechanism of steel tube truss-arches［J］. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(11): 46
-55, 63.

[1]	陈思甜，彭庆，杨敏. 亢谷景区大跨径人行玻璃悬索桥人致振动响应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 60-66.
[2]	郭俊，刘胜红，高嵩，蔡林真. 自锚式独塔悬索桥竖向弯曲振动基频估算公式[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(05): 27-32.
[3]	刘羽宇,王永虎. 考虑轮胎侧偏特性的跨座式单轨车桥耦合振动模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 34(3): 7-11.
[4]	桂水荣,张超,陈水生. 车桥耦合振动缩尺模型试验的相似律研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 34(2): 10-14.
[5]	谢秉敏，向中富，王小松，王少怀. 公轨两用斜拉桥竖向车桥耦合振动分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 32(4): 551-554.
[6]	张卓，高建平. 考虑水流路径长度的 S 型曲线超高段纵坡研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 32(4): 594-596.
[7]	谢秉敏，向中富，王小松，王少怀. 基于ANSYS 的车桥耦合动力分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 31(5): 935-938.
[8]	黄明非. 曲线桥在地震作用下的面内转动机理分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 30(6): 1265-1269.
[9]	陈榕峰, 章权, 张建莉. 简支梁在行驶车辆下的动态响应[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 27(6): 1014-1016,1150.
[10]	孙延国, 王骑. 连续刚构桥最大悬臂施工状态抖振响应简化分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 27(S1): 863-866.
[11]	隋严春，肖盛燮，李放，国祥明. 钢管砼拱桥模型构建及自振特性对比分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2007, 26(6): 10-14.
[12]	程翔云. 关于三跨简支悬索桥振动频率方程的讨论[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2001, 20(2): 22-24.
[13]	林梅, 肖盛夑. 桥梁车辆振动分析理论评述[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 1998, 17(3): 1-9.