基于典型洪水过程的丁坝河段主流线特征分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2022.09.09

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (09): 63-69.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2022.09.09

基于典型洪水过程的丁坝河段主流线特征分析

王平义1,2，张帆1,3，牟萍1

(1. 重庆交通大学水利水运工程教育部重点实验室，重庆 400074； 2. 重庆交通大学国家内河航道整治工程技术研究中心，重庆 400074； 3. 长江师范学院土木建筑工程学院，重庆 408100)

收稿日期:2021-09-22 修回日期:2022-07-16 发布日期:2022-09-30
作者简介:王平义(1964—)，男，河南周口人，教授，博士，主要从事港口及航道工程等方面的研究。E-mail:py-wang@163.com 通信作者：张帆（1987—），女，河南襄城县人，博士研究生，主要从事港口及航道工程等方面的研究。E-mail: zf9214@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFB1600400）；重庆市研究生科研创新项目（CYB21217）；水利水运工程教育部重点实验室开放基金项目（SLK2021B07）

Mainstream Line Characteristics of Spur Dike Reach Based on Typical Flood Process

WANG Pingyi1,2, ZHANG Fan1,3, MOU Ping1

(1. Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2. National Engineering Research Center for Inland Waterway Regulation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 3. School of Civil Architectural and Engineering, Yangtze Normal University, Chongqing 408100, China)

Received:2021-09-22 Revised:2022-07-16 Published:2022-09-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探明丁坝的修建和天然非恒定来流对航道主流线的综合影响，采用非恒定流二维浅水模型，计算了典型洪水过程中长江上游单丁坝整治河段的流场分布，分析了河段主流线特征及其对通航安全的影响；定义并计算了主流线的空间和时间变化特征。研究表明：丁坝整治河段主流线具有显著的沿程分区特点，推荐以坝轴线为界将河段沿水流方向划分6个特征区间；在坝后近区主流线最曲折、最不稳定（曲折程度为重度，游荡摆动程度为剧烈，最大摆动幅度为河宽的30%），在坝轴线附近河段发生从对岸向坝所在岸近40°的稳定偏转，影响了通航安全；在上游距离坝轴线8.4倍坝长以外和下游距离坝轴线23.6倍坝长以外，主流线顺直稳定，不影响洪水期间的通航安全。

关键词: 航道工程；丁坝河段；洪水过程；主流线；通航安全；数值计算

Abstract: In order to explore the comprehensive influence of spur dike construction and naturally unsteady incoming flow on the main streamline of the channel, the unsteady flow two-dimensional shallow water model was used to calculate the flow field distribution of the regulation reach of a single spur dike in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River during a typical flood process. And the characteristics of the mainstream line of the reach and its impact on navigation safety were analyzed. The spatial and temporal variation characteristics of the mainstream were defined and calculated. The research shows that the mainstream line of the spur dike regulation reach has significant characteristics of zoning along the way, and it is recommended to divide the reach along the flow direction into 6 characteristic intervals with the dam axis as the boundary. The mainstream line in the near area behind the dam is the most tortuous and unstable (the tortuous degree is severe, the wandering swing degree is drastic, and the maximum swing amplitude reaches 30% of the river width). A stable deflection of nearly 40° from the opposite bank to the bank where the dam is located occurs in the reach near the dam axis, which affects navigation safety. At a distance of 8.4 times the dam length at the upstream and 23.6 times the dam length at the downstream from the dam axis, the mainstream line is straight and stable, which does not affect the navigation safety during the flood.

Key words: waterway engineering; spur dike regulation reach; flood process; mainstream line; navigation safety; numerical calculation

中图分类号:

U611

王平义1,2，张帆1,3，牟萍1. 基于典型洪水过程的丁坝河段主流线特征分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(09): 63-69.

WANG Pingyi1,2, ZHANG Fan1,3, MOU Ping1. Mainstream Line Characteristics of Spur Dike Reach Based on Typical Flood Process[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2022, 41(09): 63-69.

参考文献

［1］武永新，王建家，苑希民.丁坝工程冲刷与防护措施研究综述［J］.自然灾害学报，2020，29(1)：1-10.
WU Yongxin, WANG Jianjia, YUAN Ximin. Research summary on scouring and protection safety of spur dike ［J］. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2020, 29 (1):1-10.
［2］应强，焦志斌. 丁坝水力学［M］.北京：海洋出版社，2004：11-15.
YING Qiang, JIAO Zhibin. Hydraulics of Spur Dike ［M］. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2004:11-15.
［3］ VAGHEFI M, SAFARPOOR Y, AKBARI M. Numerical investigation of flow pattern and components of three-dimensional velocity around a submerged T-shaped spur dike in a 90° bend ［J］. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23(11): 2984-2998.
［4］宁健.丁坝绕流流场及局部冲刷数值模拟研究［D］.西安：西安理工大学，2019.
NING Jian.Numerical Simulation of Flow Field and Local Scour Around Spur Dike ［D］. Xian: Xian University of Technology, 2019.
［5］李子龙，寇军，张景新.明渠条件下单丁坝绕流特征的数值模拟［J］.计算力学学报，2016，33(2)：245-251.
LI Zilong, KOU Jun, ZHANG Jingxin. Numerical simulations of flows around a single spur dike in open channel ［J］. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2016, 33(2):245-251.
［6］王慧，胡旭跃，马利军，等.丁坝头部附近速度分布特征及对通航影响距离的试验研究［J］.安全与环境学报，2010，10(5)：167-172.
WANG Hui, HUXuyue, MA Lijun, et al. Experimental studies on flow characteristics near spur dike head and the influence on navigation distance ［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2010, 10(5):167-172.
［7］赵鹏飞.长江上游典型浅滩束水丁坝影响幅度研究［D］.重庆：重庆交通大学，2017：.
ZHAO Pengfei. Study on Influence Range of Water Spur Dike in Typical Shoal of Upper Reaches of Yangtze River ［D］. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2017.
［8］李佳，沈小雄，胡旭跃，等.基于船舶受力试验的丁坝区通航安全问题研究［J］.水运工程，2016(5)：70-75.
LI Jia, SHENXiaoxiong, HU Xuyue, et al. Navigation safety in spur dike area based on ship force experiment ［J］. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2016 (5):70-75.
［9］庄灵光，姚仕明，赵占超.水流动力轴线摆幅与弯曲河道曲率关系研究［J］.水利水电技术，2020，51(8)：86-93.
ZHUANG Lingguang, YAO Shiming, ZHAO Zhanchao. Study on relationship between swing amplitude of flow dynamic axis and curvature of bending river channel ［J］. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2020, 51 (8): 86-93.
［10］郭秀吉，侯素珍，王平.黄河小北干流主流线变化与来水来沙的关系［J］.中国农村水利水电，2018(11)：98-102.
GUO Xiuji, HOU Suzhen, WANG Ping. The Relationship between changes of the main streamline and flow and sediment regime in Xiaobeiganliu reach of Yellow River ［J］. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2018 (11):98-102.
［11］刘亚，李义天，孙昭华，等.荆江河段水沙条件与主流线特征关系研究［J］.水利水运工程学报，2011(2)：77-83.
LIU Ya, LI Yitian, SUN Zhaohua, et la. Relationship between flow and sediment regime and changes of main streamline in Jingjiang reach ［J］. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2011 (2):77-83.
［12］ NAULT J D, KARNEY B W. Comprehensive adaptive modelling of 1-D unsteady pipe network hydraulics ［J］. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2021, 59(2):263-279.
［13］ RETSINIS E, DASKALAKI E, PAPANICOLAOU P. Dynamic flood wave routing in prismatic channels with hydraulic and hydrologic methods ［J］. Aqua (London), 2020, 69(3):276-287.
［14］ TANG Jing, ZHANG Jian, LI Bin, et al. Unsteady flow simulation with mesh adaptation ［J］. International Journal of Modern Physics B, Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical Physics, Applied Physics, 2020, 34(14/15/16): 2040080.
［15］ JAMAL J F, BHALLAMUDI S M. Efficient solution algorithm for unsteady flow in channel networks usingsubtiming technique ［J］. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2020, 146(6): 04020012.
［16］ BUTERA I, CLIMACI M, TANDA M G. Numerical analysis of phreatic levels in river embankments due to flood events ［J］. Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2020, 590:125382.
［17］ WAN Zhiyong, LI Yun, WANG Xiaogang, et al. Influence of unsteady flow induced by a large-scale hydropower station on the water level fluctuation of multi-approach channels: A case study of the Three Gorges Project, China ［J］. Water (Basel), 2020, 12(10):2922.
［18］喻涛.非恒定流条件下丁坝水力特性及冲刷机理研究［D］.重庆：重庆交通大学, 2013.
YU Tao.Study on Hydraulic Characteristics and Scour Mechanism of Spur Dike in Unsteady Flow ［D］. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2013.
［19］张帆.非恒定流作用下丁坝水沙运动及水毁特征数值模拟［D］.重庆：重庆交通大学, 2014.
ZHANG Fan.Numerical Simulation for Spur Dikes Water and Sediment Motion and Waterlogging Characteristics under the Action of Unsteady Flow ［D］. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2014.
［20］李枫.船舶触碰丁坝事故成因［J］.中国水运，2003(7)：18-19.
LI Feng. Causes of ship touching spur dikes ［J］. China Water Transport, 2003 (7):18-19.

[1]	李文杰1，李伟明2，杨胜发1，杨威1，王大伟2. 航道承载力内涵及评价方法研究—以长江上游航道为例[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(10): 74-80.
[2]	熊正华1，陈茜2. 内河船舶溢油建模与仿真[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(06): 77-83.
[3]	伍文俊. 三峡成库初期长江万州—涪陵河段航道变化研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 32(3): 475-479.
[4]	罗宏. 三峡成库初期长江涪陵—长寿河段航道水流条件变化分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 32(1): 147-151.
[5]	秦宗模,,吴宋仁. 澜沧江曼厅大沙坝浅滩整治效果分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2009, 28(6): 1102-1106.
[6]	王平义,荣学文,程昌华,贺晓春. 山区河流航道整治建筑物遭受异相耦合破坏作用的特征及仿真探讨[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2001, (S1): 109-111.
[7]	李文杰1，樊宇奇2，戴卓2，杨威1，杨胜发1. 岷江下游铜锣湾段航道三维水温分布特征研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(11): 131-136.

基于典型洪水过程的丁坝河段主流线特征分析

Mainstream Line Characteristics of Spur Dike Reach Based on Typical Flood Process

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics