山洪冲击角度对路基冲击力分布规律影响的试验研究D

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.05.15

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (05): 97-102.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.05.15

山洪冲击角度对路基冲击力分布规律影响的试验研究D

王贺，陈洪凯，张金浩，王群

(重庆交通大学岩土工程研究所，重庆 400074)

收稿日期:2018-11-19 修回日期:2020-04-24 出版日期:2020-05-26 发布日期:2020-06-18
作者简介:王贺(1987—)，男，河南周口人，博士研究生，主要从事道路工程防灾减灾方面的研究。E-mail：wanghe95599@163.com。
基金资助:
2016年重庆高校创新团队建设计划资助项目（CXTDG201602012）

Experimental Study on Influence of Impact Angle of Mountain Torrent on Distribution Rule of Impact Force on Subgrade

WANG He, CHEN Hongkai, ZHANG Jinhao, WANG Qun

(Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

Received:2018-11-19 Revised:2020-04-24 Online:2020-05-26 Published:2020-06-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究山洪流体以不同冲击角度θ冲击路基时路基的受力分布状态，开展了室内模型试验。在试验路基面板上14个测点布设了动态应变系统及高清摄像仪，选择5个冲击角度θ = 15°、30°、45°、60°和70°模拟山洪冲击；分析了路基受山洪冲击作用的冲击力-时程（F-t）曲线；结合高清摄像仪纪录的视频资料，研究了山洪冲击角度θ对路基所受冲击力F分布的影响规律。结果表明：以5个不同冲击角度冲击路基的山洪，在流经流通区弯道处，均有明显的超高，且路基上部及右部测点出现了阵流现象；当冲击角度θ = 15°时，山洪冲击力最大，山洪最先冲击路基下部的测点9，最后冲击右上部的测点13；无论哪个冲击角度，山洪最大冲击力Fmax均出现在靠近沟口的路基下侧处，且有Fmax,15°>Fmax,45°>Fmax,30°>Fmax,75°>Fmax,60°；山洪冲击角度θ对路基平均冲击力Fm的分布有着很大的影响，且有Fm,15°>Fm,30°>Fm,75°>Fm,45°>Fm,60°。

关键词: 道路工程, 山洪, 冲击角度, 冲击力分布, 公路路基

Abstract: In order to study the distribution of impact force on subgrade F under the impact of mountain torrent with different impact angle θ, the indoor model test was carried out. Firstly, the dynamic strain system and high-definition camera were set up on the fourteen measuring points on the tested subgrade panel, and five impact angles which were 15°, 30°, 45°, 60 ° and 70 ° were selected to simulate the mountain torrent impact. Secondly, the impact force-time history (F-t) curve of subgrade under the impact of mountain torrent was analyzed. Finally, combining with the video data recorded by high-definition camera, the influence rule of the impact angle θ of mountain torrent on the distribution of the impact force on subgrade F was studied. The results show that: the mountain torrents that impact the subgrade with five different impact angles all have obvious superelevation at the bend of the flow area, and there are array flow phenomena at the upper and right measuring points of subgrade. When the impact angle θ is 15°, the mountain torrent impact force is the largest, and the measuring point No. 9 at the lower part of the subgrade is firstly impacted by mountain torrent, while the measuring point No. 13 at the upper right part is the last to suffer from mountain torrent impact. Regardless of the impact angle, the maximum impact force on subgrade Fmax appears at the lower side of the subgrade near the gully, and the order is Fmax,15°>Fmax,45°>Fmax,30°>Fmax,75°>Fmax,60°. And the impact angle θ of mountain torrent has a great influence on the distribution of the average impact force on subgrade Fm, and the order is Fm,15°>Fm,30°>Fm,75°>Fm,45°>Fm,60°.

Key words: highway engineering, mountain torrent, impact angle, distribution of impact force, subgrade

中图分类号:

U41
P642.2

王贺，陈洪凯，张金浩，王群. 山洪冲击角度对路基冲击力分布规律影响的试验研究D[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(05): 97-102.

WANG He, CHEN Hongkai, ZHANG Jinhao, WANG Qun. Experimental Study on Influence of Impact Angle of Mountain Torrent on Distribution Rule of Impact Force on Subgrade[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2020, 39(05): 97-102.

参考文献

［1］陈洪凯，唐红梅，鲜学福，等.泥石流冲击特性模型试验［J］.重庆大学学报，2010，33(5)：114-119.
CHEN Hongkai, TANG Hongmei, XIAN Xuefu, et al. Experimental model of debris flow impact features［J］. Journal of Chongqing University: Natural Science Edition,
2010, 33( 5) : 114-119.
［2］陈洪凯，鲜学福，唐红梅，等.水石流冲击信号能量分布试验研究［J］.振动与冲击，2012，31(14)：56-59.
CHEN Hongkai, XIAN Xuefu, TANG Hongmei, et al.Energy distribution in spectrum of shock signal for non-viscous debris flow［J］.Journal of Vibration and Shock,
2012, 31(14) : 56-59.
［3］陈洪凯，鲜学福，唐红梅，等.泥石流冲击力的时频分析方法及应用［J］.防灾减灾工程学报，2011，31(3)：255-260.
CHEN Hongkai, XIAN Xuefu, TANG Hongmei, et al.Time- frequency analysis method of debris flow impact loads and its application［J］.Journal of Disaster Prevention
and Mitigation Engineering, 2011, 31(3) : 255-260.
［4］何思明，李新坡，吴永.考虑弹塑性变形的泥石流大块石冲击力计算［J］.岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(8)：1664-1669.
HE Siming, Li Xinpo, WU Yong. Calculation of impact force of boulder in debris flow considering elastoplastic deformation ［J］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics
and Engineering, 2007,26(8): 1664-1669.
［5］ KATTEL P, KAFLE J, FISCHER J T, et al. Interaction of two-phase debris flow with obstacles［J］. Engineering Geology, 2018, 242: 197-217.
［6］何晓英，陈洪凯，唐红梅，等.泥石流龙头冲击特性模型实验研究［J］. 重庆交通大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 33(1):85-89.
HE Xiaoying, CHEN Hongkai, TANG Hongme, et al. Experimental study on impacting characteristics of debris flow heads［J］. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University
(Natural Science), 2014, 33(1): 85-89.
［7］蒋昌波, 杨武, 陈杰,等.孤立波作用下沿海路基冲刷实验研究［J］.海洋工程, 2014, 32(5):34-39.
JIANG Changbo, YANG Wu, CHEN Jie, et al.Experimental study on scour around coastal road by solitary waves［J］. The Ocean Engineering, 2014, 32(5):34-39.
［8］刘丽, 陈洪凯. 弯道流速与路基冲刷深度关系研究［J］. 路基工程, 2010(5):1-3.
LIU Li, CHEN Hongka. Relationship between bend flow velocity and subgrade scour depth［J］. Subgrade Engineering, 2010(5):1-3
［9］ WANG Dongpo, CHEN Zheng, HE Siming, et al. Measuring and estimating the impact pressure of debris flows on bridge piers based on large-scale laboratory
experiments［J］. Landslides, 2018,15(7): 1331-1345.
［10］ HU Xiaozhang, SONG Lixiang. Hydrodynamic modeling of flash flood in mountain watersheds based on high-performance GPU computing ［J］. Natural Hazards,
2018, 91(2):567-586.
［11］ CAI Hubo, RASDORF W, TILLEY C. Approach to determine extent and depth of highway flooding ［J］. Journal of Infrastructure System, 2007, 13(2):157-167.
［12］ TANG Jinbo, HU Kaiheng. A debris-flow impact pressure model combining material characteristics and flow dynamic parameters［J］. Journal of Mountain
Science, 2018, 15(12):2721-2729.
［13］ RYBCHENKO A A, KADEOVA A V, KOZIREVA E A. Relation between basin morphometric features and dynamic characteristics of debris flows — a case study in
Siberia, Russia［J］. Journal of Mountain Science, 2018, 15(3): 618-630.
［14］ KIM M-I, KWAK J-H, KIM B-S. Assessment of dynamic impact force of debris flow in mountain torrent based on characteristics of debris flow ［J］.
Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018,77(14):538.

[1]	张淑宝. 一种中央分隔带分离式改进混凝土护栏的研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 107-111.
[2]	赵伟. 纳米蒙脱石/SBS复掺改性沥青性能试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 118-122.
[3]	郭鹏1，陈思贤1，曹志国1，刘俊1，孟建玮2，鲜江林3. 复配废机油再生剂的制备及性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 87-91.
[4]	肖庆一1,2，赵鹏1，孙博伟3，张怡4，丁啸5. 废植物油再生沥青结合料性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 92-98.
[5]	何丽红1,2,温仙仙1,2,侯艺桐1,2,邓稳1,2. 阴离子乳化沥青粒径大小及分布影响因素分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 99-104.
[6]	姚爱玲1，王军伟2，许敏3，杨孟乾4，杨涛1. 水泥稳定碎石基层沥青路面隆起开裂数值分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 105-111.
[7]	赵全满，任瑞波，刘瑶，李志刚，户桂灵. 城市道路检查井井周路面破坏机理[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 87-94.
[8]	王志祥1,2，李建阁1，陈楚鹏2. 基于变权重评价的沥青路面使用性能灰色预测[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 95-101.
[9]	肖庆一1，2，3，封仕杰1，孙立东1，陈向伟1. 碱渣掺量对不同龄期下半刚性再生基层力学性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 102-109.
[10]	潘兵宏1，2，任卉2，单慧敏1，霍永富1. 客货分离整体式路基互通出口同分带开口长度研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 83-90.
[11]	孔令云1，邹胜楠1，黄麟钬2，吴海鹰3，余苗1，杨博1. 复合式路面疲劳裂纹扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 91-97.
[12]	凌天清1，魏巧2，李传强3，袁海2，杨清尘3. 生物柴油-塑料裂解蜡复合温拌改性沥青性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 98-104.
[13]	王清洲1，孙超1，檀奥龙2，魏连雨1. 膨胀性泥岩重塑土膨胀力试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 112-117.
[14]	王民1,2，尚飞1，肖丽1，包广志3. 钢桥面浇注式沥青铺装复合梁疲劳损伤规律分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 84-88.
[15]	董仕豪，韩森，尹媛媛，吴松，张启鑫. 基于表面能理论的石灰改性沥青黏附性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 89-97.

山洪冲击角度对路基冲击力分布规律影响的试验研究D

Experimental Study on Influence of Impact Angle of Mountain Torrent on Distribution Rule of Impact Force on Subgrade

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics