车辆撞击下UHPC连接预制拼装桥墩动力响应及耐撞性能优化

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2021.10.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以UHPC连接预制拼装高架桥墩为研究对象，基于LS-DYNA软件对车辆撞击桥墩进行非线性有限元分析。通过UHPC试块轴压试验与落锤试验得到CSCM本构模型；并分析了不同撞击速度下预制拼装桥墩与整体现浇桥墩撞击力、变形发展规律及内力响应的异同；最后通过改变接缝钢筋直径，接缝处摩擦系数及下接缝处UHPC高度等关键参数进一步对预制拼装桥墩耐撞性能进行优化。结果表明：撞击后预制拼装桥墩的振动周期明显比整体现浇桥墩要短；拼装柱裂缝发展由墩底杯口上端向撞击背面延伸，整体柱则是从墩底延伸；两个桥墩的墩底易出现剪切破坏，被撞击处易发生弯曲破坏，其中拼装柱墩顶可能还会发生弯曲破坏，整浇柱墩顶易出现剪切破坏，拼装柱和整体柱抗撞性能差异不大；此外提高UHPC高度，相较于接缝钢筋直径和接缝处摩擦系数，对拼装柱耐撞性能提升最为明显，桥墩损伤破坏和动力响应也明显下降，可有效提升该桥墩的耐撞性能。

关键词: 桥梁工程；预制拼装桥墩；UHPC；耐撞性能优化；有限元分析

Abstract: Based on LS-DYNA software, the nonlinear finite element analysis of vehicle impact piers was carried out based on UHPC connected prefabricated viaduct piers. Firstly, the CSCM constitutive model was obtained through the UHPC block axial compression test and drop hammer test. Secondly, the similarities and differences of impact force, deformation development law and internal force response between precast assembled piers and cast-in-place piers under different impact velocities were analyzed. Finally, the crashworthiness of precast assembled piers was furtherly optimized by changing the key parameters such as the diameter of joint reinforcement, the friction coefficient at the joint and the UHPC height at the lower joint. The results show that the vibration period of the precast piers after impact is obviously shorter than that of cast-in-place piers. The crack of assembled column develops from the upper end of the cup mouth at the pier bottom to the back side, while the integral column develops from the bottom of the pier. The bottom of two piers is prone to shear failure, and the place of impact is prone to bending failure. Among them, bending failure may occur on the pier top of assembled column, and shear failure may occur on the pier top of the whole cast column. There is little difference between the crashworthiness of assembled column and integral column. In addition, when the height of UHPC is increased, the crashworthiness of the assembled column is improved most obviously, compared with the diameter of the joint steel bar and the friction coefficient at the joint. The damage and dynamic response of the pier are also obviously reduced, which can effectively improve the crashworthiness of the pier.

Key words: bridge engineering; prefabricated pier; UHPC; optimization of crashworthiness; finite element analysis

中图分类号:

U443

王银辉1, 2，冯泽牛1，罗征2. 车辆撞击下UHPC连接预制拼装桥墩动力响应及耐撞性能优化[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(10): 73-81.

WANG Yinhui1,2, FENG Zeniu1, LUO Zheng2. Dynamic Response and Crashworthiness Optimization of Prefabricated Piers Connected by UHPC under Vehicle Impact[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2021, 40(10): 73-81.

参考文献

［1］陈林，曾玉烨，颜泽峰，等.车辆撞击下钢筋混凝土桥墩的动力响应及损伤特征［J］.振动与冲击，2019，38(13)：261-267.
CHEN Lin, ZENG Yuye, YAN Zefeng, et al. Dynamic response and damage characteristics of a RC pier under vehicle impacting［J］. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019,
38(13): 261-267.
［2］周德源，刘长勋.车辆撞击作用下RC桥墩动力响应［J］.建筑科学与工程学报，2020，37(2)：11-19.
ZHOU Deyuan, LIU Changxun. Dynamic response of RC bridge pier under vehicle impact load［J］. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2020, 37(2): 11-19.
［3］王向阳，吴琼.城市跨线桥梁的车-桥墩碰撞模拟分析［J］.公路与汽运，2017(5)：142-145.
WANG Xiangyang, WU Qiong. Simulation analysis of vehicle-pier collision of urban overpass bridges［J］. Highway and Automotive Applications, 2017(5): 142-145.
［4］曹伟，吴合良，贺耀北.车撞作用下桥墩非线性损伤及加固措施研究［J］.中外公路，2017，37(4)：147-151.
CAO Wei, WU Heliang, HE Yaobei. Study on nonlinear damage and reinforcement measures of piers under vehicle impact［J］. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2017,
37(4): 147-151.
［5］徐鑫.UHPFRC增强桥墩抗车撞性能研究［D］.长沙：湖南大学，2018.
XU Xin.Performance of UHPFRC-Strengthened Bridge Column Subjected to Vehicle Collisions［D］. Changsha: Hunan University, 2018.
［6］ ZHANG Xihong, HAO Hong, LI Chao. Experimental investigation of the response of precast segmental columns subjected to impact loading［J］. International
Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 95: 105-124.
［7］ ZHANG Xihong, HAO Hong, LI Chao. The effect of concrete shear key on the performance of segmental columns subjected to impact loading［J］. Advances in
Structural Engineering, 2016, 20: 352-373.
［8］ DO T V, PHAM T, HAO Hong. Numerical investigation of the behavior of precast concrete segmental columns subjected to vehicle collision［J］.Engineering
Structures, 2018, 156: 375-393.
［9］ SHIM C S, CHUNG C H, KIM HH. Experimental evaluation of seismic performance of precast segmental bridge piers with a circular solid section［J］. Engineering
Structures, 2008, 30: 3782-3792.
［10］黄云青.预制拼装桥墩高宽比及连接方式对其抗震性能影响的数值分析［D］.青岛：青岛理工大学，2018.
HUANG Yunqing. Numerical Analysis of Influence of Aspect Ratio and Connection Mode on Seismic Performance of Precast Segmental Bridge Piers［D］. Qingdao:
Qingdao University of Technology, 2018.
［11］王海涛，王立成.钢纤维高强轻骨料混凝土弯曲韧性与抗冲击性能［J］.建筑材料学报，2013，16(6)：1082-1086.
WANG Haitao, WANG Licheng. Flexural toughness and impact resistance of steel fiber reinforced high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete［J］. Journal of Building
Material, 2013, 16(6): 1082-1086.
［12］莫金生，马骉，张洁，等.UHPC连接节段拼装桥墩拟静力试验［J］.结构工程师，2018，34(增刊)：88-95.
MO Jinsheng, MA Biao, ZHANG Jie, et al. Quasi-static testing of prefabricated assembly pillars connected with UHPC［J］. Structure Engineers, 2018, 34(Sup): 88-95.
［13］ MOHAN P, MARZOUGUI D. Validation of a single unit truck model for roadside hardware impact［J］. International Journal of Vehicle Systems Modelling and
Testing, 2007, 2(1): 1-15.
［14］陈林.桥墩防车辆撞击研究［D］.长沙：湖南大学，2015.
CHEN Lin.Research on Bridge Piers Subjected to Vehicle Collisions［D］. Changsha: Hunan University, 2015.
［15］ SEMENDARY A A, SVECOVA D. Factors affecting bond between precast concrete and cast in place ultra high performance concrete (UHPC)［J］. Engineering
Structures, 2020, 216: 1-15.
［16］ YOO D Y, BANTHIA N, KIM S W, et al. Response of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete beams with continuous steel reinforcement subjected to
low-velocity impact loading［J］. Composite Structures, 2015, 126: 233-245.
［17］ COTSOVOS D M, STATHOPOULOS N D, ZERIS C A. Behavior of RC beams subjected to high rates of concentrated loading［J］.Journal of Structural Engineering,
2008, 134(12): 1839-1851.
［18］乔朋，钟承星，王宗义，等.我国车-桥耦合振动的研究现状及发展趋势［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版)，2019，38(12)：26-37.
QIAO Peng, ZHONG Chengxing, WANG Zongyi, et al. Research status and development trend of vehicle-bridge coupling vibration in China［J］. Journal of Chongqing
Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2019, 38 (12): 26-37.
［19］张爱锋，刘少康，姚苗苗，等.船桥碰撞结构损伤及船撞力影响因素分析［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版)，2021，40(3)：121-127.
ZHANG Aifeng, LIU Shaokang, YAO Miaomiao, et al. Analysis of structural damage caused by ship-bridge collision and influencing factors of ship collision force［J］.
Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2021, 40(3): 121-127.

[1]	蒲万丽1，林长生1，王郴2. 落石撞击双柱式桥梁的动态响应及损伤分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(08): 88-96.
[2]	郑植1,2，耿波2，袁佩2，李嵩林2，胡正涛3. 桥墩复合材料防船撞装置新型连接试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 66-73.
[3]	琚利平1，王银辉2，陆晓宏3，单继栋4. 行车落物作用下钢筋混凝土箱梁破坏形态分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 72-78.
[4]	吴丽丽1，安丽佩1,2. 折线板型正交异性钢桥面板受力性能的参数分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(11): 59-65.
[5]	孙马，周建庭，徐略勤，高鹏，阳珊清. 基于加速锈蚀试验的RC梁抗弯性能劣化研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(08): 51-58.
[6]	邱红胜1，朱万鑫1，李俊辉2，付张龙1. 锚杆静压桩在预制拼装桥墩中的沉降特性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(08): 59-65.
[7]	王虎，陈翔，王雅. 层间接触条件下黏弹性铺装层力学分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(07): 66-72.
[8]	李思达，焦明东. 某黄河公路大桥防护护栏设计研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(05): 65-69.
[9]	赵国云1，江振华2. 浇注式钢桥面铺装工艺和性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(04): 46-51.
[10]	马丽英，李茂其，曹源文,董琴琴. 沥青桥面压实均匀性实时检测方法研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(02): 69-74.
[11]	鲁邦泽1,2 ，邵旭东1,2 ，邱明红1,2 ，周林云1,2 ，张阳1,2. 密集隔板UHPC箱梁体外预应力束转向构造研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(01): 51-59.
[12]	赵金钢1，胡靖2，张永水3，杜斌1，贾宏宇4. 近场地震作用下钢筋混凝土高墩地震易损性分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(10): 25-32.
[13]	赵文忠1,2，康健1，梁栋1. 索梁结构面内耦合振动机理研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(08): 20-26.
[14]	李峰. 基于振动法的拉索抗弯刚度及拉力实用估算公式研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(06): 17-21.
[15]	樊见维1，张峰2，高磊2，王大伟2，高华睿2. 预应力夹片锚钢筋回缩量概率分布模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(03): 9-13.