基于SIS传播理论的城市交通拥堵传播模型

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2023.06.14

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 103-110.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2023.06.14

• 交通基础设施工程 • 上一篇

基于SIS传播理论的城市交通拥堵传播模型

陈玉婷1，晏启鹏1，毛剑楠1，黄豪1，刘澜1,2

（1. 西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院，四川成都 611756； 2. 西南交通大学综合交通运输智能化国家地方联合工程实验室，四川成都 611756）

收稿日期:2021-08-18 修回日期:2021-10-08 发布日期:2023-08-01
作者简介:陈玉婷（1994—），女，江西南昌人，博士研究生，主要从事交通网络建模方面的研究。E-mail: 2587418931@qq.com 通信作者：刘澜(1965—)，男，四川雅安人，教授，主要从事智能交通建模与控制方面的研究。E-mail：jianan_l@home.swjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(61873216); 四川省科技厅项目(2020YFSY0020, 2020YFS0586)

Urban Traffic Congestion Propagation Model Based on SIS Propagation Theory

CHEN Yuting1, YAN Qipeng1, MAO Jiannan1, HUANG Hao1, LIU Lan1,2

（1. School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, Sichuan, China; 2. National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Integrated Transportation Intelligence, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, Sichuan, China）

Received:2021-08-18 Revised:2021-10-08 Published:2023-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究城市交通拥堵传播的机理与特性，建立了基于SIS传播理论的城市交通拥堵传播模型。首先，确定了路段交通状态的判别方法，并比较分析了不同判别标准下拥堵传播效率和消散效率的数值变化；其次，考虑了出行时间的差异性并在经典SIS理论中加入了时间偏差参数；随后，研究了拥堵路段比例随时间的变化趋势以及拥堵路段比例与其变化率间的关系，并将其作为描述拥堵传播特征的依据；最后，以成都市道路交通网络作为研究路网，以早高峰真实数据对模型进行标定与验证。结果表明，模型可以精确地描述拥堵路段比例与其变化率之间的关系。

关键词: 交通运输工程；城市交通；拥堵传播模型；病毒传播理论；网络交通拥堵；交通状态识别

Abstract: In order to study the mechanism and characteristics of urban traffic congestion propagation patterns, an urban traffic congestion propagation model was proposed based on SIS propagation theory. Firstly, the identification methods for the traffic status of road sections were determined, and the numerical changes in congestion propagation efficiency and dissipation efficiency under different identification criteria were compared and analyzed. Secondly, the difference of travel time was considered, and the time deviation parameters were added into classical SIS theory. Then, the variation trend of the proportion of congested road sections over time and the relationship between the proportion of congested road sections and their change rate were studied and taken as a basis to describe the characteristics of congestion propagation. Finally, the Chengdu road traffic network was used as the research road network, and the proposed model was calibrated and validated by using real data during morning peak hours. The results show that the proposed model can accurately describe the relationship between the proportion of congested road sections and their change rate.

Key words: traffic and transportation engineering; urban traffic; congestion propagation model; virus transmission theory; network traffic congestion; traffic state identification

中图分类号:

U491

陈玉婷1，晏启鹏1，毛剑楠1，黄豪1，刘澜1,2. 基于SIS传播理论的城市交通拥堵传播模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 42(6): 103-110.

CHEN Yuting1, YAN Qipeng1, MAO Jiannan1, HUANG Hao1, LIU Lan1,2. Urban Traffic Congestion Propagation Model Based on SIS Propagation Theory[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2023, 42(6): 103-110.

参考文献

［1］ ZHANG Zhao, WOLSHON B, DIXIT V V. Integration of a cell transmission model and macroscopic fundamental diagram: Network aggregation for dynamic traffic models ［J］. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2015, 55: 298-309.
［2］张琦, 肖文锦, 潘刚. 基于元胞自动机的轨道交通客流拥堵传播研究［J］. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(4): 83-89.
ZHANG Qi, XIAO Wenjin, PAN Gang. A CA-based simulation model of urban railway large passenger flow congestion transmission ［J］. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(4): 83-89.
［3］ NAGY A M, SIMON V. A novel congestion propagation modeling algorithm for smart cities ［J］. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2021, 73: 101387.
［4］ NGUYEN H, LIU Wei, CHEN Fang. Discovering congestion propagation patterns in spatio-temporal traffic data ［J］. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 2017, 3(2): 169-180.
［5］牛凯, 罗瑞琪, 齐庆祥. 基于BP神经网络的城市交通拥堵等级预测［J］. 天津建设科技, 2021, 31(5): 7-9.
NIU Kai, LUO Ruiqi, QI Qingxiang. Prediction of urban traffic congestion level based on BP neural network ［J］. Tianjin Construction Science and Technology, 2021, 31(5): 7-9.
［6］ AKSHARA S，MARISAMYNATHAN S. Development of congestion index model and analysis of mitigation measures on urban arterials using microsimulation ［J］. European Transport-Trasporti Europei, 2021(81): 2021817.
［7］韦伟, 刘岭, 彭其渊, 等. 数据驱动的偶发拥堵时空建模及传播分析［J］. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(2): 189-195.
WEI Wei, LIU Ling, PENG Qiyuan, et.al. Data-driven space-time modeling and propagation study of network-wide sudden congestion ［J］. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(2): 189-195.
［8］刘杰, 殷勇. 基于级联失效的交通拥堵仿真研究［J］. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2018, 16(2): 136-144.
LIU Jie, YIN Yong. Research on simulation of traffic congestion based on cascade failure ［J］. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 16(2): 136-144.
［9］ CHEN Yuting, YANG Da, JIA Bingmei, et al. Traffic wave models for the urban road with a work zone ［J］. Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research, 2021,14(6): 675-684.
［10］李树彬, 吴建军, 高自友, 等. 基于复杂网络的交通拥堵与传播动力学分析［J］. 物理学报, 2011, 60(5): 146-154.
LI Shubin, WU Jianjun, GAO Ziyou, et.al. The analysis of traffic congestion and dynamic propagation properties based on complex network ［J］. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(5): 146-154.
［11］ ARNOTT R. A bathtub model of downtown traffic congestion ［J］. Journal of Urban Economics, 2013,76: 110-121.
［12］ GEROLIMINIS N, DAGANZO C F. Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings ［J］. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2008, 42(9): 759-770.
［13］ DI Xiaolei, XIAO Yu, ZHU Chao, et al. Traffic congestion prediction by spatiotemporal propagation patterns ［C］// 2019 20th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM). IEEE, 2019: 298-303.
［14］ SAEEDMANESH M, GEROLIMINIS N. Dynamic clustering and propagation of congestion in heterogeneously congested urban traffic networks ［J］. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2017,105: 193-211.
［15］ LIU Chengkun, QIN Kun, KANG Chaogui. Exploring time-dependent traffic congestion patterns from taxi trajectory data ［C］// 2015 2nd IEEE International Conference on Spatial Data Mining and Geographical Knowledge Services (ICSDM). IEEE, 2015: 39-44.
［16］ OLMOS L E, OLAK S, SHAFIEI S, et al. Macroscopic dynamics and the collapse of urban traffic ［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(50): 12654-12661.
［17］ DAGANZO C F. Queue spillovers in transportation networks with a route choice ［J］. Transportation Science, 1998, 32(1): 3-11.
［18］ OLAK S, LIMA A, GONZLEZ M C. Understanding congested travel in urban areas ［J］. Nature Communications, 2016, 7(1): 10793.
［19］ BROCKMANN D, HELBING D. The hidden geometry of complex, network-driven contagion phenomena ［J］. Science, 2013, 342(6164): 1337-1342.
［20］ DAGANZO C F. On the macroscopic stability of freeway traffic ［J］. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2011, 45(5): 782-788.
［21］ MAHMASSANI H S, SABERI M, ZOCKAIE A. Urban network gridlock: Theory, characteristics, and dynamics ［J］. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013,36: 480-497.
［22］ ANDERSON R M, MAY R M. Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control ［M］. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
［23］代晓旭, 胡明华, 田文, 等. 利用传染病模型研究空中交通拥挤传播规律［J］. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(6): 121-126.
DAI Xiaoxu, HU Minghua, TIAN Wen, et.al. Mechanisms of congestion propagation in air traffic management based on infectious diseases model ［J］. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(6): 121-126.
［24］ WU J J, GAO Z Y, SUN H J. Simulation of traffic congestion with SIR model ［J］. Modern Physics Letters B, 2004, 18(30): 1537-1542.
［25］ SABERI M, HAMEDMOGHADAM H, ASHFAQ M, et al. A simple contagion process describes spreading of traffic jams in urban networks ［J］. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 1616.
［26］ LI Yiming, ZHAO Luming, YU Zhouyu, et al. Traffic flow prediction with big data: A learning approach based on SIS-complex networks ［C］// 2017 IEEE 2nd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC). IEEE, 2017: 550-554.

[1]	韩宝睿, 濮海建, 朱震军. 基于改进Lotka-Volterra模型的城市轨道交通与常规公交竞合关系演变研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 42(2): 106-112.
[2]	何烈云, 周妍, 黄少泽, 刘强. 叠加放行信号控制方式适用条件及效益评价[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 42(1): 113-119.
[3]	李振龙, 董爱华, 杨磊. 基于群决策和熵权法的换道轨迹评价研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 42(1): 120-127.
[4]	赵树恩, 刘伟. 基于改进VGG模型的低照度道路交通标志识别[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(10): 178-184.
[5]	李英帅1，闫琦若1，赵聪2. 基于公交车右转内轮差效应的范围研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(09): 43-48.
[6]	阎莹1，刘革1，田敏1，刘佳乐1，穆岩2. 基于Trucksim的弯坡组合路段临界车速确定方法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(09): 49-54.
[7]	胡明伟1,2,3，施小龙1，翟素云4,刘鹏1. 自动驾驶混合交通流的交通和环境效益评估[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(08): 7-14.
[8]	李佳1，王雪松2. 密集路网中城市主干路中观安全分析模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(08): 34-41.
[9]	焦柳丹1,朱影含1,吴雅2,宋向南3. 基于演化博弈理论的城市轨道交通高峰票价定价研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(08): 42-49.
[10]	查伟雄，冯涛，严利鑫. 考虑车辆到达时间窗的应急公交调度优化模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(08): 57-62.
[11]	潘兵宏，周锡浈，韩雪艳. 高速公路隧道入口连续视觉参照设施设置研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(08): 132-139.
[12]	程谦1 ，朱晓宁2 ，卢万胜3. 中长运距城际旅客出行方式选择行为模型——以高铁、民航为例[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 39-45.
[13]	连齐才1，李涵1，石小林1，闫章存2. 基于面板数据Mixed logit模型的自动驾驶选择行为分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 46-52.
[14]	戚春华，王笑男，朱守林，李航天. 基于驾驶员视觉兴趣区域的交通工程设施信息量阈值研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 53-60.
[15]	李升朝，吴越，白雪萌，王玥，张海. 基于TOPSIS与灰色关联的危货车辆违规报警研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 61-66.

基于SIS传播理论的城市交通拥堵传播模型

Urban Traffic Congestion Propagation Model Based on SIS Propagation Theory

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics