城市蔓延对生态系统服务流的影响研究进展及对长江流域的启示

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2024.02.05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 全面梳理城市蔓延对生态系统服务流的影响研究现状，有利于促进区域社会经济可持续发展。综述了城市蔓延对生态系统服务流的影响研究，结果表明：城市蔓延对生态系统服务流的影响研究仍处于起步阶段。城市蔓延通过载体传递和流动路径两方面改变了生态系统服务流的流量、流速和流向，导致生态系统服务流总量的减少和空间异质性的增加；城市蔓延的单项指标变化、城市蔓延的尺度以及城市蔓延的多情景模拟是探索城市蔓延对生态系统服务流影响过程的主要切入点；城市蔓延过程中引起的生态系统服务流扩散效应主要源于土地利用类型的变化和人类居住模式的改变。已有研究在一定程度上解释了城市蔓延对生态系统服务流的影响，但在揭示影响机理、剖析影响过程、评估影响效应以及探索生态系统服务流合理分配以促进城市可持续发展等方面的研究还存在较大空白。在此前提下，未来应基于“机理揭示-影响模拟-效应评估”的研究思路，建立长江流域城市蔓延对生态系统服务流影响研究框架，探索长江流域城市可持续发展与生态系统服务流的合理分配方案，实现长江流域生态保护与社会发展的协同共进。

关键词: 环境工程；长江流域；城市蔓延；生态系统服务流

Abstract: A comprehensive review of the current research status on the impact of urban sprawl on ecosystem service flows is conducive to promoting the sustainable social and economic development of regions. The research on the impact of urban sprawl on ecosystem service flow was summarized. The results show that the research on the impact of urban sprawl on ecosystem service flows is still in its infancy. Urban sprawl changes the flow, velocity, and direction of ecosystem service flows through both carrier transmission and flow paths, leading to a decrease in the total amount of ecosystem service flows and an increase in spatial heterogeneity. The single index change, scale, and multi-scenario simulation of urban sprawl are the main entry points to explore the impact process of urban sprawl on ecosystem service flows. The diffusion effect of ecosystem service flows caused by urban sprawl mainly stems from changes in land use types and changes in human living patterns. Previous studies have to some extent explained the impact of urban sprawl on ecosystem service flows, but there is still a significant gap in revealing the impact mechanism, analyzing the impact process, evaluating the impact effects and exploring the rational allocation of ecosystem service flows to promote sustainable urban development. Under this premise, a research framework for the impact of urban sprawl in the Yangtze River Basin on ecosystem service flows should be established based on the research approach of “mechanism revelation-impact simulation-effect evaluation” in the future. And the sustainable development of cities in the Yangtze River Basin and a reasonable allocation plan for ecosystem service flow should be explored, to realize coordinated progress between ecological protection and social development in the Yangtze River Basin.

Key words: environmental engineering; Yangtze River Basin; urban sprawl; ecosystem service flows

中图分类号:

官冬杰1,2,和秀娟1,3, 周李磊1. 城市蔓延对生态系统服务流的影响研究进展及对长江流域的启示[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 43(2): 30-39.

GUAN Dongjie1,2, HE Xiujuan1,3, ZHOU Lilei1. Research Progress of the Impact of Urban Sprawl on the Ecosystem Service Flows and Implications for the Yangtze River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2024, 43(2): 30-39.

参考文献

［1］ BAGSTAD K J, JOHNSON G W, VOIGT B, et al. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services［J］. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 117-125.
［2］刘慧敏, 刘绿怡, 任嘉衍, 等. 生态系统服务流定量化研究进展［J］. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2723-2730.
LIU Huimin, LIU Luyi, REN Jiayan, et al. Progress of quantitative analysis of ecosystem service flow ［J］. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(8): 2723-2730.
［3］傅伯杰, 田汉勤, 陶福禄, 等. 全球变化对生态系统服务的影响研究进展［J］. 中国基础科学, 2020, 22(3): 25-30.
FU Bojie, TIAN Hanqin, TAO Fulu, et al. Progress of the impact of global change on ecosystem services［J］.China Basic Science, 2020, 22(3): 25-30.
［4］邓楚雄, 朱大美, 聂小东, 等. 生态系统服务权衡最新研究进展［J］. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(10): 1509-1522.
DENG Chuxiong, ZHU Damei, NIE Xiaodong, et al. Progress of research regarding the trade-offs of ecosystem services［J］.Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(10): 1509-1522.
［5］ CHENG Bo, LI Huaien, YUE Siyu, et al. A conceptual decision-making for the ecological base flow of rivers considering the economic value of ecosystem services of rivers in water shortage area of Northwest China［J］. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 578: 124126.
［6］ HU Tian, WU Jiansheng, LI Weifeng. Assessing relationships of ecosystem services on multi-scale: A case study of soil erosion control and water yield in the Pearl River Delta［J］. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 99: 193-202.
［7］谢天, 侯鹰, 陈卫平, 等. 城市化对土壤生态环境的影响研究进展［J］. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4): 1154-1164.
XIE Tian, HOU Ying, CHEN Weiping, et al. Impact of urbanization on the soil ecological environment: A review［J］. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 1154-1164.
［8］ LI Ting, LI Jing, WANG Yanze. Carbon sequestration service flow in the Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region of China: How it flows, what drives it, and where could be optimized?［J］. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 96: 548-558.
［9］刘畅, 刘耕源, 杨青. 水坝建设对河流生态系统服务价值影响评估［J］. 人民黄河, 2019, 41(8): 88-94.
LIU Chang, LIU Gengyuan, YANG Qing.New ecosystem services valuation method on dam projects［J］. Yellow River, 2019, 41(8): 88-94.
［10］ LANKIA T, KOPPEROINEN L, POUTA E, et al. Valuing recreational ecosystem service flow in Finland［J］. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 2015, 10: 14-28.
［11］ ZANK B, BAGSTAD K J, VOIGT B, et al. Modeling the effects of urban expansion on natural capital stocks and ecosystem service flows: A case study in the Puget Sound, Washington, USA［J］. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016, 149: 31-42.
［12］王莉雁, 肖燚, 江凌, 等. 城镇化发展对呼包鄂地区生态系统服务功能的影响［J］. 生态学报, 2016, 36(19): 6031-6039.
WANG Liyan, XIAO Yi, JIANG Ling, et al. The influence of urbanization on ecosystem services in the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos region［J］.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(19): 6031-6039.
［13］李芬, 孙然好, 杨丽蓉, 等. 基于供需平衡的北京地区水生态服务功能评价［J］. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(5): 1146-1152.
LI Fen, SUN Ranhao, YANG Lirong, et al. Assessment of freshwater ecosystem services in Beijing based on demand and supply［J］.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(5): 1146-1152.
［14］张潇, 路青. 城市尺度下生态系统服务流研究综述［J］. 环境保护科学, 2020, 46(6): 55-63.
ZHANG Xiao, LU Qing. Review of ecosystem service flow in the urban scale［J］.Environmental Protection Science, 2020, 46(6): 55-63.
［15］ HE Chunyang, ZHAO Yuanyuan, TIAN Jie, et al. Modeling the urban landscape dynamics in a megalopolitan cluster area by incorporating a gravitational field model with cellular automata［J］. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 113: 78-89.
［16］ HE Chunyang, ZHANG Da, HUANG Qingxu, et al. Assessing the potential impacts of urban expansion on regional carbon storage by linking the LUSD-urban and InVEST models［J］. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2016, 75: 44-58.
［17］ SCHIRPKE U, EGARTER VIGL L, TASSER E, et al. Analyzing spatial congruencies and mismatches between supply, demand and flow of ecosystem services and sustainable development［J］. Sustainability, 2019, 11(8): 2227.
［18］ SCHRTER M, BARTON D N, REMME R P, et al. Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway［J］. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 36: 539-551.
［19］黄从红, 杨军, 张文娟. 生态系统服务功能评估模型研究进展［J］. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(12): 3360-3367.
HUANG Conghong, YANG Jun, ZHANG Wenjuan. Development of ecosystem services evaluation models: Research progress［J］. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(12): 3360-3367.
［20］ BAGSTAD K J, VILLA F, BATKER D, et al. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments［J］. Ecology and Society, 2014, 19(2): 64.
［21］ VILLA F, BAGSTAD K J, VOIGT B, et al. A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment［J］. PLOS One, 2014, 9(3): e91001.
［22］ MARTNEZ-LPEZ J, BAGSTAD K J, BALBI S, et al. Towards globally customizable ecosystem service models［J］. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650: 2325-2336.
［23］ LI Delong, WU Shuyao, LIU Laibao, et al. Evaluating regional water security through a freshwater ecosystem service flow model: A case study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China［J］. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 81: 159-170.
［24］曾莉, 李晶, 李婷, 等. 基于贝叶斯网络的水源涵养服务空间格局优化［J］. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1809-1822.
ZENG Li, LI Jing, LI Ting, et al. Optimizing spatial patterns of water conservation ecosystem service based on Bayesian belief networks［J］.Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(9): 1809-1822.
［25］ GOLDENBERG R, KALANTARI Z, CVETKOVIC V, et al. Distinction, quantification and mapping of potential and realized supply-demand of flow-dependent ecosystem services［J］. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 593-594: 599-609.
［26］杨丽雯, 董丽青, 张立伟, 等. 固碳服务供需平衡和服务流量化评估——以引黄入晋南干线为例［J］. 资源科学, 2019, 41(3): 557-571.
YANG Liwen, DONG Liqing, ZHANG Liwei, et al. Quantitative assessment of carbon sequestration service supply and demand and service flows: A case study of the Yellow River Diversion Project South Line［J］.Resources Science, 2019, 41(3): 557-571.
［27］ FISHER B, TURNER R K, MORLING P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making［J］. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68(3): 643-653.
［28］ TURNER W R, BRANDON K, BROOKS T M, et al. Global biodiversity conservation and the alleviation of poverty［J］. BioScience, 2012, 62(1): 85-92.
［29］ SERNA-CHAVEZ H M, SCHULP C J E, VAN BODEGOM P M, et al. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services［J］. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 39: 24-33.
［30］ PALOMO I, MARTN-LPEZ B, POTSCHIN M, et al. National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows［J］. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 104-116.
［31］ SCHIRPKE U, TAPPEINER U, TASSER E. A transnational perspective of global and regional ecosystem service flows from and to mountain regions［J］. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 6678.
［32］ KLEEMANN J, SCHRTER M, BAGSTAD K J, et al. Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services-A case study for Germany［J］. Global Environmental Change, 2020, 61: 102051.
［33］ SEMMENS D J, DIFFENDORFER J E, BAGSTAD K J, et al. Quantifying ecosystem service flows at multiple scales across the range of a long-distance migratory species［J］. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 31: 255-264.
［34］ LIN Jingyu, HUANG Jinliang, PRELL C, et al. Changes in supply and demand mediate the effects of land-use change on freshwater ecosystem services flows［J］. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 763: 143012.
［35］ BAR F, PALOMO I, ZULIAN G, et al. Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: A case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region［J］. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57: 405-417.
［36］李婧昕, 杨立, 杨蕾, 等. 基于熵理论的城市生态系统服务流定量评估——以北京市为例［J］. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(3): 987-996.
LI Jingxin, YANG Li, YANG Lei, et al. Quantitative assessment of urban ecosystem services flow based on entropy theory: A case study of Beijing, China［J］.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(3): 987-996.
［37］史培军, 汪明, 胡小兵, 等. 社会——生态系统综合风险防范的凝聚力模式［J］. 地理学报, 2014, 69(6): 863-876.
SHI Peijun, WANG Ming, HU Xiaobing, et al. Integrated risk governance consilience mode of social-ecological systems［J］.Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(6): 863-876.
［38］张捷, 谌莹, 石柳. 基于生态元核算的长江流域横向生态补偿机制及实施方案研究［J］. 中国环境管理, 2020, 12(6): 110-119.
ZHANG Jie,CHEN Ying, SHI Liu. Study on the horizontal ecological compensation mechanism and implementation scheme of the Yangtze River Basin based on “ecological element” accounting ［J］. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 12(6): 110-119.