基于CPTU的宁波黏性土不排水抗剪强度确定研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.16740696.2016.06.05

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 20-23.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.16740696.2016.06.05

基于CPTU的宁波黏性土不排水抗剪强度确定研究

李学鹏^1，2，杨晓娟³，蔡国军^1，2，李飚⁴，林军^1，2

(1.东南大学江苏省城市地下工程与环境安全重点实验室，江苏南京 210096；2.东南大学交通学院岩土工程研究所，江苏南京 210096；3.江西省公路工程监理公司，江西南昌 330002；4.浙江省工程勘察院，浙江宁波 315012)

收稿日期:2015-09-29 修回日期:2015-12-05 出版日期:2016-12-25 发布日期:2016-12-29
作者简介:李学鹏(1984—)，男，江西萍乡人，博士研究生，主要从事原位测试技术方面的研究。Email：lixuepeng1984@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41330641,41202203)；全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金项目(201353)；江苏省杰出青年基金项目(BK20140027)；教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划 (NCET130118)；中央高校基本科研业务费(2242013R30014)

Determination of Undrained Shear Strength of Clayey Soil in Ningbo Based on CPTU

LI Xuepeng¹, ², YANG Xiaojuan³, CAI Guojun¹, ², LI Biao⁴, LIN Jun¹, ²

(1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering and Environmental Safety, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, P. R. China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, P. R. China; 3. Jiangxi Highway Engineering Supervision Company, Nanchang 330002, Jiangxi, P. R. China; 4. Zhejiang Engineering Survey Institute, Ningbo 315012, Zhejiang, P. R. China)

Received:2015-09-29 Revised:2015-12-05 Online:2016-12-25 Published:2016-12-29
Contact: 蔡国军(1977—)，男，山东兖州人，博士，教授，主要从事现代原位测试、地基处理等方面的研究。Email：focuscai@163.com。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 黏性土的不排水抗剪强度是黏性土的重要力学指标，对于地铁车站的设计是非常重要的。由于获得无扰动试样的困难或成本限制，现代原位测试技术已广泛用于不排水抗剪强度的评价之中。以宁波地铁车站为工程背景，采用多功能孔压静力触探技术（CPTU）对黏性土进行土层测试和评价。介绍了CPTU测试技术的基本原理；根据十字板剪切强度反演孔压圆锥系数（NΔu），提出了不排水抗剪强度与超静孔压的关系，并探讨了孔压圆锥系数与孔压参数比的关系；将基于CPTU测试技术的不排水抗剪强度与室内测试结果进行对比。结果表明，采用CPTU测试技术能有效地评价黏性土的不排水抗剪强度；基于十字板剪切试验的不排水抗剪强度与基于CPTU测试技术的超静孔压有着较好的相关性；孔压圆锥系数与孔压参数比有着较好的对应关系。

关键词: 岩土工程, 黏性土, 不排水抗剪强度, CPTU, 十字板剪切试验

Abstract: The undrained shear strength is an important physical property of clayey soils and is also very valuable to the design of subway. According to the difficulty and cost constraint of obtaining the undisturbed samples of high quality, a modern insitu test was commonly applied to evaluate the undrained shear strength. In the case study of Ningbo Subway, the piezocone penetration test (CPTU) was used to test and evaluate the clayey soil. Firstly, the basic operation principles of piezocone penetration test were introduced. Secondly, according to the pore pressure cone coefficient (NΔu) obtained from the inversion of field vane shear test, the relationship between undrained shear strength and excess pore pressure was analyzed, and the relationship between the pore pressure cone coefficient and pore pressure parameter ratio was also discussed. Moreover, the results of undrained shear strength based on the piezocone penetration test were contrasted with the results obtained from laboratory test. It is shown that piezocone penetration test can be used for effective evaluation of undrained shear strength of clayey soil; the undrained shear strength obtained from field vane shear test has a good relevance with the excess pore pressure obtained from piezocone penetration test; and the pore pressure cone coefficient and pore pressure parameter ratio have some corresponding relation with each other.

Key words: geotechnical engineering, clayey soil, undrained shear strength, piezocone penetration test, field vane shear test

中图分类号:

李学鹏1，2，杨晓娟3，蔡国军1，2，李飚4，林军1，2. 基于CPTU的宁波黏性土不排水抗剪强度确定研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 35(6): 20-23.

LI Xuepeng1, 2, YANG Xiaojuan3, CAI Guojun1, 2, LI Biao4, LIN Jun1, 2. Determination of Undrained Shear Strength of Clayey Soil in Ningbo Based on CPTU[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2016, 35(6): 20-23.

参考文献

［1］ CHEN Y J, KNLHAWY F H. Undrained strength interrelationships among CIUC, UU, and UC tests［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,1993,119(11):17321750.
［2］ KOKUSHO T, HARA T, HIRAOKA R. Undrained shear strength of granular soils with different particle gradations［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2004,130(6):621629.
［3］ TANI K, CRAIG W H. Development of centrifuge cone penetration test to evaluate the undrained shear strength profile of a model clay bed［J］. Soils and Foundations,1995,35(2):3747.
［4］ LOW H E, LUNNE T, ANDERSEN K H, et al. Estimation of intact and remoulded undrained shear strengths from penetration tests in soft clays［J］. Geotechnique,2010,60(11):843859.
［5］曹宇春，杨建辉. 基于有效固结应力法确定结构性黏性土不排水抗剪强度［J］. 岩土力学,2013,34(11):3087 3090.
CAO Yuchun, YANG Jianhui. Undrained shear strength determination of structured clays based on effective consolidation stress method［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2013,34(11):30873090.
［6］龚晓南. 软黏土地基土体抗剪强度若干问题［J］. 岩土工程学报,2011,33(10):15961598.
GONG Xiaonan. Some problems concerning shear strength of soil in soft clay ground［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2011,33(10):15961598.
［7］ CAI G J, LIU S Y, TONG L Y, et al. Assessment of direct CPT and CPTU methods for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of single piles［J］. Engineering Geology,2009,104(1):211222.
［8］ CAI G J, PUPPALA A J, LIU S Y. Characterization on the correlation between shear wave velocity and piezocone tip resistance of Jiangsu soft clays［J］. Engineering Geology,2014,171(13):96103.
［9］ TEH C I, HOULSBY G T. An analytical study of the cone penetration test in clay［J］. Geotechnique,1991,41(1):1734.
［10］曾玲玲, 曾俊, 陈福全, 等. 天然沉积结构性黏土的不排水强度性状［J］. 岩土工程学报,2014,36(6):1072 1075.
ZENG Lingling, ZENG Jun, CHEN Fuquan, et al. Undrained shear strength behavior of natural sedimentary structural clay［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2014,36(6):10721075.
［11］曾玲玲, 洪振舜, 刘松玉. 考虑固结路径影响的天然沉积土不排水剪切试验研究［J］. 东南大学学报(自然科学版),2012,42(4):744748.
ZENG Lingling, HONG Zhenshun, LIU Songyu. Experimental study on undrained shear behavior of natural sedimentary clays under various consolidation stress paths［J］.Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science),2012,42(4):744748.
［12］刘松玉, 蔡国军, 童立元. 现代多功能CPTU技术理论与工程应用［M］. 北京: 科学出版社,2013.
LIU Songyu, CAI Guojun, TONG Liyuan. The Theory and Engineering Application of Piezocone Penetration Test［M］. Beijing: Science Press,2013.
［13］TONG L Y, WANG Q, DU G Y. Determination of undrained shear strength using piezocone penetration test in clayed soil for bridge foundation［J］. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition),2011,27(2):201205.
［14］SENNESET K，JANBU N，SVANO G．Strength and deformation parameters from cone penetration tests［C］//Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Penetration Testing. Rotterdam: Balkema Publishers，1982.
［15］LUNNE T, CHRISTOPHERSEN H P, TJELTA T I. Engineering use of piezocone data in North Sea clays［C］//Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Rotterdam: Balkema Publishers,1985.
［16］SU S F, LIAO H J. Influence of strength anisotropy on piezocone resistance in clay［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2002,128(2):166173.
［17］KURUP P U, VOJIADJIS G Z, TUMAY M T. Calibration chamber studies of piezocone test in cohesive soils［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,1994,120(1):81107.
［18］CAI G J, LIU S Y, TONG L Y, et al. Field evaluation of undrained shear strength from piezocone penetration tests in soft marine clay［J］. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology,2010,28(2):143153.
［19］ROBERTSON P K, SULLY J P, WOELLER D J, et al. Estimation coefficient of consolidation from piezocone tests［J］. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1992,29(4):551556.
［20］蔡国军, 刘松玉, 邵光辉, 等. 基于电阻率静力触探的连云港海相黏土成因特征分析［J］. 岩土工程学报,2008,30(4):529535.
CAI Guojun, LIU Songyu, SHAO Guanghui, et al. Analysis of formation characteristics of marine clay based on resistivity cone penetration test(RCPT)［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical engineering,2008,30(4):529535.
［21］蔡国军，张涛，刘松玉，等. 江苏海相黏土电阻率与岩土特性参数间相关性研究［J］. 岩土工程学报，2013,35(8):14701471.
CAI Guojun, ZHANG Tao, LIU Songyu, et al. Relationship between electrical resistivity and geotechnical characteristic parameters for Jiangsu marine clay［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2013,35(8):14701471.
［22］LUNNE T，ROBERTSON P K，POWELL J J M．Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice［M］. London: Blackie Academic and Professional,1997.

[1]	王宗建1,2，李畅1，肖亮2，卢谅2. 加筋黏性土加筋效果的三轴试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 99-106.
[2]	叶险峰，韩以江，祝敕捷，程雍. 基于改进变权-TOPISIS的锚固边坡失稳风险评估[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(02): 108-115.
[3]	张霄，尹占超，刘啸，段崇豪，郝彭帅. 综合物探法在运营岩溶隧道病害探查中的应用[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(10): 60-66.
[4]	曾红艳1，2，刘伟1，2，周成1，2，韩利彪1，2，谭昌明3. 抗滑短桩支护土坡的试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(09): 119-126.
[5]	何叶1,2，赵明阶1，汪魁1，吉跃辉1. 基于电阻率试验的真空饱水-干燥循环砂岩性能分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(09): 127-131.
[6]	任松1，王乐1，谢凯楠1,2，姜德义1，蒋翔1. 基于声发射计数信息熵的页岩拉压破坏临界特征试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(08): 101-107.
[7]	包小华1，章宇1，徐长节2，付艳斌1，崔宏志1，谢雄耀3. 双线盾构隧道施工沉降影响因素分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(03): 51-60.
[8]	倪文兵. 基于静力学理论的地下水浮力研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(03): 61-68.
[9]	唐红梅，王平，王林峰. 变化裂隙岩体的压缩破坏RFPA数值模拟[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(02): 103-110.
[10]	周恩全，伊思航，许想，陆建飞. 基于热力学耗散的饱和砂土循环液化特性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(02): 111-117.
[11]	秦网根1,2,蔡正银1,关云飞1,李小梅1. 典型区域软弱土室内水泥固化三轴CD试验[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(01): 103-108.
[12]	王恒1，蒋先念1，李树建2，贾智丹1. 三峡库区危岩体劣化特征及变形破坏模式研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(12): 92-96.
[13]	张建经1 ，马东华1，曾鹏毅1，孙延军2，何梦2. 新型便携式钻孔剪切仪研发与测试分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(11): 90-97.
[14]	吴锦华1，袁智洪2，周泳峰3. 古滑坡泥灰岩模拟相似材料试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(10): 81-86.
[15]	孙元1，田维强1，林德洪1，杨晴雯2，杨峥3. 开挖边坡变形监测及稳定性分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(09): 81-87.

基于CPTU的宁波黏性土不排水抗剪强度确定研究

Determination of Undrained Shear Strength of Clayey Soil in Ningbo Based on CPTU

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics