预应力混凝土连续梁桥动力特性及影响因素分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2018.10.02

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 8-12.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2018.10.02

预应力混凝土连续梁桥动力特性及影响因素分析

任翔，谭潇，宋飞，齐海鹏，马敏

(西安科技大学建筑与土木工程学院，陕西西安 710054)

收稿日期:2017-06-14 修回日期:2018-03-27 出版日期:2018-10-08 发布日期:2018-10-08
作者简介:任翔(1979—)，男，内蒙古呼和浩特人，副教授，博士，主要从事桥梁结构理论研究。E-mail：renxiang798@163.com。通信作者：宋飞(1984—)，男，河南漯河人，博士，主要从事桥梁结构地震理论研究。E-mail：songfei-8864299@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学青年基金项目(51408484)；陕西省教育厅科研计划项目(14JK1488)；中国铁建大桥工程局集团有限公司科研项目 (Cr13gk-2013-19，Cr13gk5-2013-3)

Dynamic Characteristics and Influence Factors of Pre-stressed Concrete Continuous Beam Bridge

REN Xiang, TAN Xiao, SONG Fei, QI Haipeng, MA Min

(School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xian University of Science and Technology, Xian, Shaanxi 710054, P. R. China)

Received:2017-06-14 Revised:2018-03-27 Online:2018-10-08 Published:2018-10-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探明新建桥梁动载试验实测一阶频率与理论计算结果产生偏差的原因，以某预应力混凝土变截面连续梁成桥动载试验为背景，实测了在脉动荷载下桥梁的一阶频率和振型，建立了有限元模型，同时计算了桥梁一阶频率的理论值，并对二者进行了对比；分析了纵向普通钢筋、预应力钢筋、护栏、混凝土动弹性模量等4个因素对桥梁动力特性的影响。结果表明：一阶频率实测值为1.760 Hz，理论计算值为1.395 Hz，二者偏差约21%；在有限元模型中计入纵向普通钢筋、预应力钢筋、护栏和混凝土动弹性模量后，结构的一阶频率分别为1.416、1.413、1.384和1.634 Hz，综合考虑4个因素的一阶频率为1.684 Hz；4个因素中，混凝土动弹性模量对结构一阶频率影响最为显著，其它因素影响较小可不考虑。建议利用桥梁基频进行结构刚度评定时，应在有限元模型中计入混凝土动弹性模量，使其更为接近实际状态。

关键词: 桥梁工程, 连续梁桥, 动载试验, 动弹性模量

Abstract: In order to find out the causes of deviation between first-order frequency of dynamic load test of some new bridges and the theoretical calculation results, based on the dynamic load test of a pre-stressed concrete cross-section continuous beam bridge, the first-order frequency and vibration mode of the bridge under fluctuating load were measured; meanwhile, the finite element model was established. The theoretical value of the first-order frequency of bridge was calculated, and the two were compared. The influence of 4 factors such as common longitudinal steel bar, pre-stressed steel bar, guardrail and dynamic elastic modulus of concrete on the dynamic characteristics of bridge was analyzed. The results show that the measured value and theoretical value of the first-order frequency are 1.760 Hz and 1.395 Hz respectively, whose deviation is about 21%. Taking the factors such as common longitudinal steel bar, pre-stressed steel bar, guardrail and dynamic elastic modulus of concrete into the finite element model respectively, the first-order frequency of the structure are 1.416Hz, 1.413 Hz, 1.384 Hz and 1.634 Hz respectively; and the first-order frequency is 1.684 Hz when the above four factors are considered comprehensively. Based on the above analysis results, among 4 influence factors, the dynamic elastic modulus of concrete has the most significant influence on the first-order frequency of the structure; and other factors have less influence, which may not be considered. It is suggested that when the bridge fundamental frequency is used to evaluate structure stiffness, the dynamic elastic modulus of concrete should be calculated in the finite element model, which makes the results closer to the actual state.

Key words: bridge engineering, continuous beam bridge, dynamic load test, dynamic elastic modulus

中图分类号:

U445

任翔，谭潇，宋飞，齐海鹏，马敏. 预应力混凝土连续梁桥动力特性及影响因素分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 37(10): 8-12.

REN Xiang, TAN Xiao, SONG Fei, QI Haipeng, MA Min. Dynamic Characteristics and Influence Factors of Pre-stressed Concrete Continuous Beam Bridge[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2018, 37(10): 8-12.

参考文献

［1］宁刚,马福,张少华.预应力混凝土箱型连续梁桥的动荷载试验研究［J］.中国科技论文,2015,10(7):855-859.
NING Gang, MA Fu, ZHANG Shaohua. Experimental research on dynamic load of pre-stressed concrete continuous box girder
bridge［J］. China Science Paper, 2015, 10(7): 855-859.
［2］赵崇基,张巍,刘志华,等.基于动力测试的混凝土连续梁桥有限元模型修正［J］.广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 41(4):1264-
1270.
ZHAO Chongji, ZHANG Wei, LIU Zhihua, et al. Finite element model updating on continuous concrete girder bridge based
on
dynamic test［J］. Journal of Guangxi University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 41(4):1264-1270.
［3］蔡晨宁,杨杰,陶鹏,等.某混凝土连续梁桥动力性能试验研究［J］. 工程抗震与加固改造,2014,36(5):34-39.
CAI Chenning, YANG Jie, TAO Peng, et al. Experimental study on dynamic performance of a concrete continuous box girder
bridge［J］. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2014, 36 (5): 34-39.
［4］张柳煜,邱合敏,李胜.大跨度连续梁桥荷载试验分析及加固方案研究［J］.世界桥梁, 2008,36(4):42-45.
ZHANG Liuyu, QIU Hemin, LI Sheng. Analysis of load tests and research of strengthening schemes for a long span
continuous
girder bridge［J］. World Bridges, 2008, 36(4): 42-45.
［5］王德山,桂水荣,吴志斌,等.多跨连续梁桥荷载试验及承载力评价研究［J］.中外公路,2012,32(3):121-125.
WANGg Deshan, GUI Shuirong, WU Zhibin, et al. Load test and bearing capacity evaluation of multi span continuous beam
bridge［J］. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2012, 32(3): 121-125.
［6］夏樟华,宗周红.预应力对混凝土梁动力特性的影响分析［J］.振动与冲击, 2007, 26(7):129-134.
XIA Zhanghua, ZONG Zhouhong. Analysis of influence of prestressing on dynamic characteristics of a concrete beam［J］.
Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2007, 26(7): 129-134.
［7］郑尚敏,马磊,万水.体外预应力对波形钢腹板箱梁自振频率的影响分析［J］.东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 44(1):140-144.
ZHENG Shangmin, MA Lei, WAN Shui. Analysis on effects of externally pre-stressed tendons on vibration frequency of box
girder with corrugated steel webs［J］. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 44(1): 140-
144.
［8］姜浩,郭学东,杨焕龙.环境激励下桥梁结构模态参数识别方法的研究［J］.振动与冲击, 2008, 27(11):126-128.
JIANG Hao, GUO Xuedong, YANG Huanlong.Research on modal parameters identification of bridge structure under ambient
excitation［J］.Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2008, 27(11): 126-128.
［9］ JAMES G H I, CARNE T G, LAUFFER J P. The natural excitation technique (NExT)for modal parameter extraction from
operating wind turbines［J］. Nasa Sti/recon Technical Report N, 1993, 93(4): 260-277.
［10］吕毅刚,韩伟威,吕健鸣,等.基于暴露试验的桥梁混凝土长期弹性模量试验研究［J］.公路交通科技, 2016, 33(5):78-84.
LV Yigang, HAN Weiwei, LV Jianming, et al. Experimental study on long-term elastic modulus of bridge concrete based on
exposure experiment［J］. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 33(5): 78-84.

[1]	周建庭1,2，黎娅2，张洪2，夏润川2，杨文琦2. 基于自发漏磁检测的钢绞线两点腐蚀试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 74-81.
[2]	张华1，张正琦2 ，程高3，4，田伯科1. 黄土地区陡崖坡段桩基合理临坡距研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 93-98.
[3]	刘金春，宋子轩，梁栋. 单箱三室连续梁桥在横向温度梯度与汽车偏载下的空间效应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 80-86.
[4]	郑植1,2，耿波2，袁佩2，李嵩林2，胡正涛3. 桥墩复合材料防船撞装置新型连接试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 66-73.
[5]	张阳1，屈少钦1，卢九章2，霍文斌3. UHPC纤维定向法及对受拉性能影响[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 74-80.
[6]	傅立磊. 基于随机激励响应的参数识别相关函数法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 70-75.
[7]	苏小波1，肖林2. 空间刚架结构钢-混结合段合理构造模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 76-82.
[8]	梁宗保1，柴洁1，纳守勇2，马天立1，唐玉1. 基于深度学习的桥梁健康监测数据有效性分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 78-83.
[9]	唐启智1,辛景舟1,2,周建庭1,付雷1,3,张俊4. 基于时序分析的锈蚀RC拱损伤识别：仿真与验证[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(02): 69-77.
[10]	戎贤1,2，杨洪渭1，张健新1,2. 带钢端头的装配式混凝土梁柱中节点滞回性能试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(02): 78-82.
[11]	刘小会，许杨，陈思甜，徐略勤. 人行悬索桥地震响应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 65-71.
[12]	琚利平1，王银辉2，陆晓宏3，单继栋4. 行车落物作用下钢筋混凝土箱梁破坏形态分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 72-78.
[13]	王桢1,2，周建庭1,3，张劲泉1,4，吴海军1，吴月星1. 现浇分段长度对万吨级平转斜拉桥受力的影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 44-52.
[14]	郝宪武，舒鹏，郝键铭. 大跨度非对称悬索桥的静风稳定性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 53-59.
[15]	陈思甜，彭庆，杨敏. 亢谷景区大跨径人行玻璃悬索桥人致振动响应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 60-66.

预应力混凝土连续梁桥动力特性及影响因素分析

Dynamic Characteristics and Influence Factors of Pre-stressed Concrete Continuous Beam Bridge

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics