电动自行车风险驾驶行为因子分析及相关因素研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2019.11.19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究电动自行车风险驾驶行为结构，编制了电动自行车风险驾驶行为量表，获取573份有效问卷。对风险驾驶行为问卷进行探索性因子分析提取问卷的公共因子，提取后发现，电动自行车驾驶者风险感知构面由机率评估、担忧程度、危险程度3个因子构成；驾驶信心由技术能力、判断能力2个因子构成；安全态度由交通规则、安全责任、从众心理3个因子构成；风险驾驶行为由疏忽及失误、违规行为、侵略行为、获取领先等4个因子构成。通过各构面因子得分与驾驶者特征的关联性分析，主要结果如下：男性驾驶者违规行为和获取领先行为更频繁；随着年龄的增加驾驶者获取领先的行为减少，但违规行为增多；低学历驾驶者发生侵略性驾驶行为频率更高，高学历驾驶者发生违规行为频率更高；是否驾驶过机动车对风险驾驶行为无显著影响；驾驶频率越高的驾驶者对风险的感知越低，但其对安全的态度越正向。

关键词: 交通工程, 电动自行车, 风险驾驶行为, 因子分析, 因子得分

Abstract: In order to research the risk driving behavior of electric bicycle, the E-bike Rider Behavior Questionnaire (ERBQ) was compiled and 573 valid questionnaires were obtained. Exploratory factor analysis was carried out on the questionnaire of risk driving behavior to extract the public factors of the questionnaire. The results show that the risk perception of E-bike drivers is composed of three factors: probability assessment, worry degree and risk degree. Driving confidence is composed of two factors: technical ability and judgment ability. Safety attitude is composed of three factors: traffic rules, safety responsibility and herd mentality. Risk driving behavior is composed of four factors: negligence and error, illegal behavior, aggressive behavior and gaining leading position. The main results of the correlation analysis between the scores of each aspect factor and the characteristics of drivers are as follows: male drivers have more frequent illegal behaviors and leading behaviors; with the increase of age, drivers have less leading behaviors, but more illegal behaviors. Lower-educated drivers have more aggressive behaviors, while high-educated drivers have more illegal behaviors. Whether or not driving a motor vehicle before has no significant impact on risk driving behaviors. The higher the driving frequency, the lower the risk perception, but the more positive the safety attitude.

Key words: traffic engineering, electric bicycle, risk driving behaviour, factor analysis, factor score

中图分类号:

O319.56

王涛1,黎文皓1,谢思红1,陈峻2. 电动自行车风险驾驶行为因子分析及相关因素研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(11): 118-126.

WANG Tao1, LI Wenhao1, XIE Sihong1, CHEN Jun2. Factor Analysis and Related Factors Study on Electric Bicycle Risk Driving Behavior[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2019, 38(11): 118-126.

参考文献

［1］王涛, 黎文皓, 李文勇. 电动自行车交通事故严重程度影响因素分析［J］. 广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 42(6): 2080-2088.
WANG Tao, LI Wenhao, LI Wenyong. Influence factors and injury severity in electric bicycles traffic crashes ［J］.Journal of Guangxi University(Natural Science
Edition), 2017, 42(6): 2080-2088.
［2］ FISHMAN E, CHERRY C. E-bikes in the mainstream: reviewing a decade of research ［J］.Transport Reviews, 2015, 36(1): 72-91.
［3］严新平, 张晖, 吴超仲, 等. 道路交通驾驶行为研究进展及其展望［J］. 交通信息与安全, 2013, 31(1): 45-51.
YAN Xinping, ZHANG Hui, WU Chaozhong, et al. Research progress and prospect of road traffic driving behavior ［J］. Journal of Transport Information and Safety,
2013, 31(1): 45-51.
［4］崔梦晶. 道路交通伤害的流行病学研究［D］. 南京：东南大学, 2014.
CUI Mengjing. Epidemiological Studies of Road Traffic Injuries ［D］. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2014.
［5］ LEE J D. Fifty years of driving safety research ［J］. Human Factors, 2008, 50(3): 521-528.
［6］段冀阳, 李志忠. 风险驾驶行为影响因素的研究综述［J］. 人类工效学, 2013, 19(2): 86-91.
DUAN Jiyang, LI Zhizhong. A review on the influencing factors of risk driving behavior ［J］.Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 2013, 19(2): 86-91.
［7］ REASON J, MANSTEAD A, STRADLING S, et al. Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? ［J］.Ergonomics, 1990, 33(10/11): 1315-1332.
［8］ SULLMAN M J, MEADOWS M L, PAJO K B. Aberrant driving behaviours amongst New-Zealand truck drivers ［J］. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology
and Behaviour, 2002, 5(3): 217-232.
［9］李彦章, 王正国, 尹志勇. 摩托车驾驶员驾驶行为、人格、交通安全态度与事故的关系研究［J］. 心理科学, 2008, 31(2): 491-493.
LI Yanzhang, WANG Zhengguo, YIN Zhiyong, et al. The relationship of road accidents with motorcyclists riding behaviors,personality and alfitudes towards safety［
J］.Psychological Science,2008,31(2):491-493.
［10］ FEENSTRA H, RUITER R A, SCHEPERS J, et al. Measuring risky adolescent cycling behaviour ［J］. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety
Promotion, 2011, 18(3): 181-187.
［11］ MA C, YANG D, ZHOU J, et al. Risk riding behavious of urban E-bike: a little review［J］. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
2019,16(13):2308.
［12］张卫华, 张旭欣, 冯忠祥, 等. 低能见度下驾驶人安全驾驶量表效信度分析［J］. 广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 41(5): 1545-1551.
ZHANG Weihua, ZHANG Xuxin, FENG Zhongxiang, et al. Validity and reliability of safety driving scale under low visibility ［J］.Journal of Guangxi University
(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 41(5): 1545-1551.
［13］汪益纯, 陈川. 基于因子分析法的初驾者驾驶行为研究［J］. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2012, 36(5): 1064-1068.
WANG Yichun, CHEN Chuan. Research of novice driversbehavior based on factor analysis ［J］. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science &
Engineering Edition), 2012, 36(5): 1064-1068.
［14］郑东鹏. 驾驶人危险感知及影响因素研究［D］. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2013.
ZHENG Dongpeng. Study of Driver Hazard Perception and its Influencing Factors［D］. Shanghai： Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013.
［15］姚文, 邓华, 冯学山. 上海市虹口区驾驶员人格倾向及其多发交通事故的影响因素分析［J］. 中国卫生统计, 2014, 31(3): 494-497.
YAO Wen, DENG Hua, FENG Xueshan. Analysis on the drivers personality tendency and its influencing factors of traffic accidentsin hongkou district of Shanghai［J
］. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 2014, 31(3): 494-497.
［16］ RUNDMO T, IVERSEN H. Risk perception and driving behaviour among adolescents in two Norwegian counties before and after a traffic safety campaign
［J］.Safety Science, 2004, 42(1): 1-21.
［17］ MACHIN M A, SANKEY K S. Relationships between young drivers personality characteristics, risk perceptions, and driving behaviour ［J］.Accident Analysis &
Prevention, 2008, 40(2): 541-547.
［18］ WONG J T, CHUNG Y S, HUANG S H. Determinants behind young motorcyclists risky riding behavior［J］.Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, 42(1): 275-281.
［19］ ULLEBERG P, RUNDMO T. Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers ［J］.Safety Science, 2003,
41(5): 427-443.
［20］ YAO L, WU C. Traffic safety for electric bike riders in China: attitudes, risk perception, and aberrant riding behaviors ［J］.Transportation Research
Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012, 24: 49-56.
［21］ CHILD D.The Essentials of Factor Analysis［M］. London: Cassell Educational, 1990.
［22］ CURETON E E, DAGOSTINO R B. Factor Analysis: An Applied Approach［M］. Hove:Psychology Press, 2013.
［23］庄明科, 白海峰, 谢晓非. 驾驶人员风险驾驶行为分析及相关因素研究［J］. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 4: 75-82.
ZHUANG Mingke, BAI Haifeng, XIE Xiaofei. Astudy on risky driving behavior and related factors［J］. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis(Natural
Science Edition), 2007, 4: 75-82.
［24］ MA M, YAN X, HUANG H, et al. Safety of public transportation occupational drivers: risk perception, attitudes, and driving behavior ［J］.Transportation
Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010, 12: 72-79.
［25］ O'ROURKE N, HATCHER L. A Step-By-Step Approach to Using SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling(2nd ed) ［M］. Cary :SAS Institute, 2013.
［26］ BACKHAUS K, ERICHSON B, WEIBER R, et al. Fortgeschrittene Multivariate Analysemethoden［M］. Berlin: Springer, 2015.
［27］ WANG T, CHEN J, WANG C, et al. Understand e-bicyclist safety in China: Crash severity modeling using a generalized ordered logit model ［J］.Advances in
Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 6(6):1-11.
［28］ SHINAR D, SCHECHTMAN E, COMPTON R. Self-reports of safe driving behaviors in relationship to sex, age, education and income in the US adult driving
population ［J］.Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2001, 33(1): 111-116.
［29］ TAO D, ZHANG R, QU X. The role of personality traits and driving experience in self-reported risky driving behaviors and accident risk among Chinese drivers
［J］.Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2017, 99: 228-235.
［30］ CHEN C F. Personality, safety attitudes and risky driving behaviors evidence from young Taiwanese motorcyclists ［J］. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2009,
41(5): 963-968.

[1]	唐继强1, 2，钟鑫伟2，刘健1，李天瑞3. 基于时间序列季节分类模型的轨道交通客流短期预测[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 31-38.
[2]	戚春华，王笑男，朱守林，李航天. 基于驾驶员视觉兴趣区域的交通工程设施信息量阈值研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 53-60.
[3]	邓天民1，朱杰2，朱凯家1，屈治华3. 基于iForest+Biscting K-means的驾驶风格辨识方法研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 1-6.
[4]	许茂增,张莉. 基于双射软决策理论的路段拥堵影响力识别[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 7-11.
[5]	王涛1，谢思红1，黎文皓1,2，李文勇1. 基于FFOS-ELM和PF的短时交通流自适应预测模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 21-27.
[6]	张诚1，汪成银1，陈志伟2，张正向3，张子磊3. 基于空间流量度的城市路网关键节点挖掘方法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 28-35.
[7]	王永岗，张衡，彭志鹏，周琬琦. 基于结构方程模型的出租车事故影响因素分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 36-42.
[8]	朱顺应，李维吉，林小媛，肖文彬，王红. 特色小镇游客车辆无复检管控点布设研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 52-58.
[9]	潘兵宏1,2，胡炜1，任卉1,单慧敏1. 基于TruckSim仿真下弯道货车侧滑速度模型研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 38-45.
[10]	吴文静，孙刃超，宗芳，贾洪飞. 居民低碳通勤出行的主观态度识别及影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 53-58.
[11]	李军，邓育新. 基于非负矩阵分解的出租车时空行为聚类分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 59-65.
[12]	成卫1，刘翔1，雷建明2. 基于RBF神经网络预测的交叉口信号周期时长优化[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 13-18.
[13]	史天亮，王文光. 信息观和粒子群算法在城市交通拥堵中的研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 19-25.
[14]	贺玉龙1,2，刘磊1,2，迟佳欣1,2. 高速公路车辆换道行为风险研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 26-33.
[15]	王露1，陈肖欣2，李华恩1. 大风雨雪气象条件下高速公路车辆稳定行驶的临界车速研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 34-40.