钢筋混凝土简支预裂梁车辆静载模拟试验研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.12.11

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 67-73.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.12.11

钢筋混凝土简支预裂梁车辆静载模拟试验研究

周术明1,2，颜东煌1

(1. 长沙理工大学土木与建筑学院，湖南长沙 410114； 2. 湖南城市学院，湖南益阳 413000)

收稿日期:2020-04-01 修回日期:2020-11-16 出版日期:2020-12-18 发布日期:2020-12-18
作者简介:周术明(1982—)，男，湖南益阳人，博士研究生，主要从事桥梁结构检测与监控等方面的研究。E-mail：799488568@qq.com 通信作者：颜东煌(1961—)，男，湖南长沙人，教授，博士生导师，主要从事大跨度桥梁的施工控制理论与应用方面的工作。E-mail：yandonghuang@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51678068)；长沙理工大学研究生科研创新项目(CX2016BS02)

Simulation Experiment of Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Pre-cracked Beam under Vehicle Static Load

ZHOU Shuming1,2, YAN Donghuang1

(1. School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, Hunan, China; 2. Hunan City University, Yiyang 413000, Hunan, China)

Received:2020-04-01 Revised:2020-11-16 Online:2020-12-18 Published:2020-12-18
Supported by:

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究车辆静载下钢筋混凝土简支梁桥横向开裂后的力学机理，分别在现浇钢筋混凝土试验梁的跨中和左右侧1/4处，预制了宽度为1mm，3种裂缝长度l= 8、18和26 mm的横向裂缝，开展了3个裂缝名义损伤比λ=0.053、0.120和0.173的钢筋混凝土预裂梁及未经预裂处理的完整梁车辆静载模拟试验；对比分析了预裂试验梁横向裂缝附近的挠度u、刚度折减系数η、承载时裂缝宽度w，及裂缝附近水平方向混凝土应力σc、钢筋应力σs，和二者间的黏结应力σb等性能指标；研究了预裂试验梁裂缝附近混凝土的应力分布特征，揭示了车辆静载下不同开裂部位钢筋与混凝土间相对变形与黏结应力的演化规律。研究表明：裂缝长度l越长，相同加载工况下预裂试验梁的挠度ucb、钢筋应力σs以及裂缝附近水平方向混凝土应力σc也越大；当l小于钢筋保护层时，ucb和σs增幅较小，当l等于钢筋中线高度时，ucb和σs快速增大；当l超过钢筋中线高度后，ucb和σs小幅回落；跨中预裂试验梁中，裂缝附近钢筋与混凝土的黏结应力σb及相对变形Δw呈现明显的非线性规律，而1/4处预裂试验梁中，σb及Δw则满足线性规律。

关键词: 桥梁工程, 钢筋混凝土梁, 预裂梁, 完整梁, 裂缝, 静载试验

Abstract: To research the mechanical mechanism of simply-supported reinforced concrete bridges after transverse cracking under vehicle static load, three kinds of transverse cracks with width of 1 mm and length of l=8, 18 and 26 mm were prefabricated respectively in the mid-span and 1/4 of the left and right sides of the cast-in-place reinforced concrete pre-cracked test beam. The simulation test of the reinforced concrete beams with 3 nominal damage ratios (0.053, 0.120 and 0.173) was carried out under vehicle static load. Compared with the integrated beam, the deflection u, the stiffness reduction coefficient η, the crack width w under load, the concrete stress σc in horizontal direction, the reinforcing steel stress σs, and the bonding stress σb between steel bars and concrete near the transverse crack of the pre-cracked test beam were analyzed through the experiment. The stress distribution characteristics of the concrete near the transverse crack of the pre-cracked test beam were studied, and the evolution law of relative deformation and bonding stress between steel bar and concrete at different cracking positions under vehicle static load was revealed. The research shows that the longer the crack length l is, the larger the deflection ucb, the steel stress σs and the concrete stress σc in horizontal direction near crack tip of the pre-cracked test beam under the same loading condition. When l is smaller than the reinforcement cover, the increase of ucb and σs is small; when l is equal to the height of the steel bar center line, ucb and σs increase rapidly; when l exceeds the height of the steel bar center line, ucb and σs decrease slightly. In the mid-span pre-cracked test beam, the bonding stress σb and the relative deformation Δw of the steel bar and concrete near the crack show obvious nonlinear law, while in the 1/4 pre-cracked test beam, σb and Δw satisfy the linear law.

Key words: bridge engineering, reinforced concrete beam, pre-cracked beam, integrated beam, crack, static load test

中图分类号:

U446.1

周术明1,2，颜东煌1. 钢筋混凝土简支预裂梁车辆静载模拟试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 67-73.

ZHOU Shuming1,2, YAN Donghuang1. Simulation Experiment of Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Pre-cracked Beam under Vehicle Static Load[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2020, 39(12): 67-73.

参考文献

［1］李均进. 新型空心板结构受力分析［D］.西安：长安大学, 2012.
LI Junjin. New Hollow Slab Structure Stress Analysis［D］. Xian: Changan University, 2012.
［2］ DESNERCK P, LEES J M, MORLEY C T. Bond behaviour of reinforcing bars in cracked concrete［J］. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 94:126-136.
［3］王岗.混凝土空心板梁桥典型病害机理研究［D］.杭州：浙江大学，2016.
WANG Gang. Mechanism Analysis on Typical Diseases of Prestressed Concrete Hollow-Core Slab Bridges ［D］. Hangzhou: Zhejang University, 2016.
［4］杨凡. 混凝土桥梁常见病害及耐久性分析［J］. 工程建设, 2016, 48(6): 95-97, 101.
YANG Fan. Analysis of common disease and durability of concrete bridge［J］. Engineering Construction, 2016, 48(6): 95-97, 101.
［5］ KETIYOT R, HANSAPINYO C, CARATPANGOON B. Nonlinear strut-and-tie model with bond-slip effect for analysis of RC Beam-Column joints under lateral loading
［J/OL］. International Journal of GEOMATE, 2018, 15(47): 81-88. https:∥www.researchgate.net/publication/323932496_Nonlinear_strut-and-tie_model_with_bond-
slip_effect_for_analysis_of_RC_Beam-Column_joints_under_lateral_loading.
［6］ ALFARAH B, MURCIA-DELSO J, LPEZ-ALMANSA F, et al. RC structures cyclic behavior simulation with a model integrating plasticity, damage, and bond-slip［J］.
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2018, 47(2): 460-478.
［7］ SLUYS L J, de BORST R. Failure in plain and reinforced concrete: An analysis of crack width and crack spacing［J］. International Journal of Solids and
Structures, 1996, 33(20/21/22): 3257-3276.
［8］ BILEK V, BONCZKOV S, HURTA J, et al. Bond strength between reinforcing steel and different types of concrete［J/OL］. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 190:
243-247.https:∥www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705817324736.
［9］ MAZZAROLO E, SCOTTA R, BERTO L, et al. Long anchorage bond-slip formulation for modeling of r.c. elements and joints［J］. Engineering Structures, 2012, 34:
330-341.
［10］ GAO Xiangling, LI Naikun, REN Xiaodan. Analytic solution for the bond stress-slip relationship between rebar and concrete［J］. Construction & Building
Materials, 2019, 197:385-397.
［11］ SANTOS J, HENRIQUES A A. New finite element to model bond-slip with steel strain effect for the analysis of reinforced concrete structures［J］. Engineering
Structures, 2015, 86: 72-83.
［12］ ROSSI P, WU X, Le MAOU F, et al. Scale effect on concrete in tension［J］. Materials and Structures, 1994, 27(8):437-444.
［13］李琼. HRB 500级钢筋混凝土足尺梁裂缝宽度的试验与理论研究［D］. 长沙：湖南大学, 2009.
LI Qiong. Experimental and Theoretical Study on Crack Widths of Full-Scale Reinforced Concrete Beams with HRB500 Bars［D］. Changsha: Hunan University, 2009.
［14］ SOMAYAJI S, SHAH S P. Bond stress versus slip relationship and cracking response of tension members［J/OL］. Journal of the American Concrete Institute,
1981, 78(3): 217-225.https:∥www.scholars. north western.edu/en/publications/bond-stress-versus-slip-relationship-and-cracking-response-of-ten.
［15］ TASSIOS T P, YANNOPOULOS P J. Analytical studies on reinforced concrete members under cyclic loading based on bond stress-slip relationships［J/OL］.
Journal Proceedings, 1981, 78(3): 206-216.https:∥www.concrete.org/publications/internationalconcreteabstractsp
ortal/m/details/id/6919.
［16］ PHAN T S, ROSSI P, TAILHAN J L. Numerical modelling of the concrete/rebar bond［J］. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2015, 59（59）: 1-9.
［17］何世钦，赵仁豪，商峰.不同加载速率下混凝土剪力传递性能试验研究［J］.混凝土，2019(6): 27-30，36.
HE Shiqin, ZHAO Renhao, SHANG Feng. Experimental research of different loading rates on shear transfer behavior in concrete［J］. Concrete, 2019 (6): 27-30, 36.
［18］周术明，颜东煌. 车辆荷载作用下损伤开裂简支空心板的断裂力学特征［J］.公路交通科技，2019，36(1)：98-105.
ZHOUShuming, YAN Donghuang. Fracture mechanical characteristics of simply supported hollow slab with cracks under vehicle load［J］. Journal of Highway and
Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 36(1): 94-101.
［19］谭冬莲，王浩，王显张.基于裂缝特征参数的在役混凝土梁桥抗弯刚度评估［J］.上海应用技术学院学报（自然科学版），2016，16(4)：334-337.
TAN Donglian, WANG Hao, WANG Xianzhang. Existing bridge beam flexural rigidity assessment based on crack characteristics［J］. Journal of Shanghai Institute of
Technology (Natural Science), 2016, 16(4): 334-337.
［20］ CASANOVA A, JASON L, DAVENNE L. Bond slip model for the simulation of reinforced concrete structures［J］. Engineering Structures, 2012, 39: 66-78.
［21］ SELLIER A, MILLARD A. A homogenized formulation to account for sliding of non-meshed reinforcements during the cracking of brittle matrix composites:
Application to reinforced concrete［J］. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 213: 182-196.

[1]	周建庭1,2，黎娅2，张洪2，夏润川2，杨文琦2. 基于自发漏磁检测的钢绞线两点腐蚀试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 74-81.
[2]	张华1，张正琦2 ，程高3，4，田伯科1. 黄土地区陡崖坡段桩基合理临坡距研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 93-98.
[3]	刘金春，宋子轩，梁栋. 单箱三室连续梁桥在横向温度梯度与汽车偏载下的空间效应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 80-86.
[4]	郑植1,2，耿波2，袁佩2，李嵩林2，胡正涛3. 桥墩复合材料防船撞装置新型连接试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 66-73.
[5]	张阳1，屈少钦1，卢九章2，霍文斌3. UHPC纤维定向法及对受拉性能影响[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 74-80.
[6]	傅立磊. 基于随机激励响应的参数识别相关函数法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 70-75.
[7]	苏小波1，肖林2. 空间刚架结构钢-混结合段合理构造模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 76-82.
[8]	梁宗保1，柴洁1，纳守勇2，马天立1，唐玉1. 基于深度学习的桥梁健康监测数据有效性分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 78-83.
[9]	唐启智1,辛景舟1,2,周建庭1,付雷1,3,张俊4. 基于时序分析的锈蚀RC拱损伤识别：仿真与验证[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(02): 69-77.
[10]	戎贤1,2，杨洪渭1，张健新1,2. 带钢端头的装配式混凝土梁柱中节点滞回性能试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(02): 78-82.
[11]	刘小会，许杨，陈思甜，徐略勤. 人行悬索桥地震响应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 65-71.
[12]	琚利平1，王银辉2，陆晓宏3，单继栋4. 行车落物作用下钢筋混凝土箱梁破坏形态分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 72-78.
[13]	王桢1,2，周建庭1,3，张劲泉1,4，吴海军1，吴月星1. 现浇分段长度对万吨级平转斜拉桥受力的影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 44-52.
[14]	郝宪武，舒鹏，郝键铭. 大跨度非对称悬索桥的静风稳定性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 53-59.
[15]	陈思甜，彭庆，杨敏. 亢谷景区大跨径人行玻璃悬索桥人致振动响应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 60-66.

钢筋混凝土简支预裂梁车辆静载模拟试验研究

Simulation Experiment of Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Pre-cracked Beam under Vehicle Static Load

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics