拱面复合材料套箱车撞力折减效果研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2025.08.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提出了用于城市高架墩车撞防护的拱面复合材料套箱，为分析新型套箱的撞击力折减效果，开展了拱形、波浪形、半圆形、锯齿形和矩形等5种撞击面形状试件的准静态压缩试验，对比试件的荷载-位移曲线和吸能能力；以传统的钢+混凝土防撞装置和垂直立面复合材料防撞套箱为对照，通过车撞桥数值仿真分析了不同撞击工况下拱面复合材料套箱的撞击力折减率，从而验证新型套箱的缓冲性能。研究结果表明：防车撞装置平面形状可采用平行四边形提高对高架墩易撞易损位置的防护；拱形撞击面可显著提升防车撞装置的吸能能力，相比传统的垂直立面吸能能力提高约26%；拱面复合材料套箱对于8 t货车的撞击可有效折减33.3%的车撞力，对于25 t货车的撞击可有效折减51.5%的车撞力；拱面复合材料套箱的车撞力折减效果优于钢+混凝土装置和垂直立面套箱，较钢+混凝土装置可至少提高111.0%，较垂直立面套箱可至少提高45.5%。

关键词: 桥梁工程；城市高架墩；防车撞装置；车撞力折减率

Abstract: The arched-surface composite material device for protecting urban elevated piers against vehicle collision was proposed. In order to analyze the collision force reduction effect of the new device, the quasi-static compression tests of specimens with five kinds of collision surface shapes such as arched, wavy, semicircular, sawtooth and rectangular shapes were carried out, and the load-displacement curve and energy-absorbing capacity of the test specimens were compared. Compared with the traditional steel + concrete anti-collision device and the vertical face composite material device, the collision force reduction rate of the arched-surface composite material device under different collision conditions was analyzed through numerical simulation of vehicle-bridge collision, so as to verify the buffering performance of the new device. The research results show that the planar shape of the anti-collision device can adopt parallelograms to improve the protection of the collision-prone and damage-prone position of the elevated pier. The arched collision surface can significantly improve the energy-absorbing capacity of the anti-collision device, which is about 26% higher than that of the traditional vertical face. The arched-surface composite material device can effectively reduce the vehicle collision force by 33.3% for the collision of an 8-ton truck and by 51.5% for the collision of a 25-ton truck. The reduction effect of the vehicle collision force of the arched-surface composite material device is better than that of the steel + concrete device and the vertical facade device, which is at least 111.0% higher than that of the steel + concrete device and at least 45.5% higher than that of the vertical facade device.

Key words: bridge engineering; urban elevated pier; anti-vehicle-collision device; reduction rate of the vehicle collision force

中图分类号:

U447

何沛建1,2，耿波1,2，冯侠1,2,曾浩楠1,2. 拱面复合材料套箱车撞力折减效果研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 44(8): 15-24.

HE Peijian1,2， GENG Bo1,2， FENG Xia1,2， ZENG Haonan1,2. Vehicle Collision Force Reduction Effect of the Arched-Surface Composite Material Device[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2025, 44(8): 15-24.

参考文献

［1］陆新征, 张炎圣, 何水涛, 等. 超高车辆撞击桥梁上部结构研究: 损坏机理与撞击荷载［J］. 工程力学, 2009, 26(增刊2): 115-125.
LU Xinzheng, ZHANG Yansheng, HE Shuitao, et al. Collision between over-high trucks and bridge superstructures: damage mechanism and impact loads［J］. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(Sup 2): 115-125.
［2］刘飞, 罗旗帜, 蒋志刚, 等. 考虑地基土和轴压力影响的桥墩撞击响应模型［J］. 地震工程与工程振动, 2017, 37(4): 112-120.
LIU Fei, LUO Qizhi, JIANG Zhigang, et al. The impact response model of bridge piers considering subsoil and axial load［J］. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2017, 37(4): 112-120.
［3］林柏欢. 橡胶混凝土力学性能优化及其应用于梁、墩构件防撞的试验研究［D］. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2018.
LIN Baihuan. Experimental Study on Optimization of Mechanical Properties of Rubber Concrete and Its Application in Anti-collision of Beam and Pier Members［D］. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2018.
［4］ NIKNEJAD A, ALI ELAHI S, LIAGHAT G H. Experimental investigation on the lateral compression in the foam-filled circular tubes［J］. Materials & Design (1980-2015), 2012, 36: 24-34.
［5］ NIKNEJAD A, ASSAEE H, ALI ELAHI S, et al. Flattening process of empty and polyurethane foam-filled E-glass/vinylester composite tubes—An experimental study［J］.Composite Structures, 2013, 100: 479-492.
［6］刘海证, 李睿, 徐征. 泡沫铝外包混凝土桥墩防撞性能研究［J］. 公路工程, 2019, 44(4): 13-17, 40.
LIU Haizheng, LI Rui, XU Zheng. Research on anti-collision ability of bridge pier with aluminum foam outsourcing concrete［J］. Highway Engineering, 2019, 44(4): 13-17, 40.
［7］潘晋, 曹晓爱, 李娜. 负泊松比防车撞结构的耐撞性研究［J］. 公路, 2023, 68(3): 136-142.
PAN Jin, CAO Xiaoai, LI Na. Research on the crash resistance of a negative Poissons ratio anti-collision structure［J］. Highway, 2023, 68(3): 136-142.
［8］ LI Dong, YIN Jianhua, DONG Liang, et al. Strong re-entrant cellular structures with negative Poissons ratio［J］. Journal of Materials Science, 2018, 53(5): 3493-3499.
［9］ FAZILATI J, ALISADEGHI N. Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of multi-layer honeycomb energy absorber panels under axial impact［J］.Thin-Walled Structures, 2016, 107: 197-206.
［10］ QIAO J X, CHEN C Q. Impact resistance of uniform and functionally graded auxetic double arrowhead honeycombs［J］.International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 83: 47-58.
［11］潘晋, 方涵, 吴亚锋, 等. 桥梁复合材料防车撞吸能结构碰撞性能分析［J］. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(8): 122-127.
PAN Jin, FANG Han, WU Yafeng, et al. Numerical analysis on the impact performance of composite energy absorption structure of bridge pier against vehicle collision［J］. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 46(8): 122-127.
［12］韩伟, 方海, 祝露, 等. 蜂窝与梯形格构腹板增强泡沫夹芯复合材料防撞装置吸能特性［J］. 振动与冲击, 2023, 42(12): 236-248.
HAN Wei, FANG Hai, ZHU Lu, et al. Energy absorption behavior of an anti-collision device with foam-filled sandwich composite materials reinforced by honeycomb and trapezoidal lattice webs［J］. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2023, 42(12): 236-248.
［13］岳哲. 高速行驶的汽车撞击桥墩过程中桥墩的受力行为研究［D］. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2014.
YUE Zhe. Mechanical Behaviors Study on the Collision Process between Vehicles and Piers［D］. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2014.
［14］王银辉, 冯泽牛, 罗征. 车辆撞击下UHPC连接预制拼装桥墩动力响应及耐撞性能优化［J］. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40(10): 73-81, 90.
WANG Yinhui, FENG Zeniu, LUO Zheng. Dynamic response and crashworthiness optimization of prefabricated piers connected by UHPC under vehicle impact［J］. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2021, 40(10): 73-81, 90.
［15］陈林, 曾玉烨, 颜泽峰, 等. 车辆撞击下钢筋混凝土桥墩的动力响应及损伤特征［J］. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(13): 261-267, 273.
CHEN Lin, ZENG Yuye, YAN Zefeng, et al. Dynamic response and damage characteristics of a RC pier under vehicle impacting［J］. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(13): 261-267, 273.
［16］樊伟, 毛薇, 庞于涛, 等. 钢筋混凝土柱式桥墩抗车撞可靠度分析研究［J］. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(2): 162-176.
FAN Wei, MAO Wei, PANG Yutao, et al. Reliability analysis of reinforced concrete column bridge piers subjected to vehicle collisions［J］. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(2): 162-176.
［17］何沛建, 冯侠. 乐城大桥船撞设防标准与防护方案研究［J］. 公路交通技术, 2023, 39(5): 140-146.
HE Peijian, FENG Xia. Research on ship collision prevention standards and protection schemes for lecheng bridge［J］. Technology of Highway and Transport, 2023, 39(5): 140-146.
［18］郑植, 耿波, 杨波, 等. 新型旋转式护栏防车撞能力与导向机理［J］. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(12): 202-214.
ZHENG Zhi, GENG Bo, YANG Bo, et al. Anti-collision ability and guiding mechanism of a new rotary guardrail［J］. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(12): 202-214.

[1]	刘浪1，赵一飞1，夏永庆2，罗浩1，徐漫菲1. 受重载车辆撞击桥梁的剩余车行可靠度研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 44(3): 1-8.
[2]	代志力1，2，向中富1，2，周蕙3. 矩阵化的有限差分算法声波方程仿真效率分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(01): 67-71.
[3]	刘家奎1，罗浩1，杜斌2. 混凝土拱桥拱架法施工风险分析及对策[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 37(05): 18-22.
[4]	王楹. 一种改进的桥梁裂缝图像滤波算法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 36(12): 13-17.
[5]	章荣军，程钰诗，郑俊杰，陈耀晖. 考虑空间变异性的水泥固化海泥垦地围堰稳定性分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 35(6): 73-76.
[6]	陈强. 服役RC梁桥CFRP板加固后的动态可靠度分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 35(5): 5-8.
[7]	宋军，周建庭，王明斌，姜睿. 基于黄金分割率模型的钢筋混凝土梁桥裂缝模式研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 35(5): 9-12.
[8]	邹毅松，谷志敏，王银辉，张凯. 滚石撞击下混凝土桥墩损伤仿真模拟[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 34(6): 27-31.
[9]	高荣雄. 基于非线性有限元的桥梁船撞分析与撞击力研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 34(1): 12-15.
[10]	洪华，刘山洪，马登阳. 基于机构分析法的圬工拱桥病害产生机理研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 33(2): 1-4.
[11]	张奔牛，范中华，黄锐，张旭，杨光，李星星，吴韬. 基于机敏网的混凝土结构裂缝宽度监测方法研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 33(2): 26-29.
[12]	徐建红. 钢筋混凝土整体式空心板桥的开裂机理和性能评估方法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 30(6): 1278-1281.
[13]	毕晨华，张永水. 超高车辆碰撞桥梁的有限元损伤分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 30(6): 1294-1297.
[14]	耿江玮，朱东生，向中富，包桂钰. 非规则连续梁桥非线性地震反应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 30(2): 185-189.
[15]	林辉，周云岗，简方良. 考虑风险的桥梁防火措施选择[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 30(2): 213-216.