中文核心期刊
CSCD来源期刊
中国科技核心期刊
RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 134-139.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2014.05.30

• • 上一篇    下一篇

公路工程项目保证金合理性评价

许茂增1,吴柯2,刘光凤1   

  1. 1 重庆交通大学 管理学院 ,重庆 400074,2 重庆交通大学 交通运输学院,重庆 400074
  • 收稿日期:2013-05-15 修回日期:2013-08-20 出版日期:2014-10-15 发布日期:2015-03-10
  • 作者简介:许茂增(1960—),男,陕西大茘人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事管理科学与工程方面的研究。E-mail:546290122@qq.com。

Rationality Evaluation on the Road Engineering Project Security

Xu Maozeng1, Wu Ke2, Liu Guangfeng1   

  1. 1. School of Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2. School of Traffic & Transportation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
  • Received:2013-05-15 Revised:2013-08-20 Online:2014-10-15 Published:2015-03-10

摘要: 从公路施工企业的角度总结了现行公路工程项目保证金缴纳种类,运用模糊集合、隶属函数和模糊统计方法建立了公路施工企业保证金种类合理性评价模型,通过实例验证了所建立的评价模型的可行性。结果显示:现阶段公路施工企业保证金种类中除了投标保证金、履约保证金和质量保证金被认为是合理的,民工工资保证金被认为趋于合理,其他的保证金都被认为是不合理的;此外还分析了出现不合理保证金的原因,提出了改善对策。

关键词: 工程管理, 公路工程项目, 公路施工企业, 保证金种类, 合理性评价

Abstract: The current road engineering project security types were summarized from the perspective of the road construction enterprise. The rationality evaluation model on the road construction enterprise security types based on the fuzzy set, membership function and fuzzy statistical method was proposed. A numerical example was carried out to prove that the proposed evaluation model was feasible. The research results show that the bid security, performance security and quality security are rational; the migrant workers salary security tends to be rational, and others are thought to be irrational at present. In addition, the reasons why the irrational security types appear are analyzed and the improvement measures are also proposed.

Key words: engineering management;road engineering project, road construction enterprise, security types, rationality evaluation

中图分类号: