中文核心期刊
CSCD来源期刊
中国科技核心期刊
RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 141-145.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2016.04.28

• 交通运输工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

修订版驾驶愤怒量表在中国驾驶人中的效信度分析

冯忠祥1，雷叶维1，周穆雄2，张卫华1，刘晓峰1，王锟1   

  1. （1.合肥工业大学 汽车与交通工程学院，安徽 合肥 230009；2.公安部交通管理科学研究所，江苏 无锡 214151）
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-01 修回日期:2015-08-30 出版日期:2016-08-20 发布日期:2016-08-20
  • 作者简介:第一作者：冯忠祥（1982—），男，安徽含山人，副教授，博士，主要从事驾驶行为与驾驶人生理心理特性方面的研究。E-mail:fzx@hfut.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目（51308177，51578207）；高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目（20120111120021）；安徽省自然科学基金项目（1408085MG137）；通路交通安全公安部重点实验室开放基金资助项目（2016ZDSYSKFKT02-1）

Validity and Reliability of the Revised Driving Anger Scale for Chinese Drivers

FENG Zhongxiang1, LEI Yewei1,ZHUO Muxiong2,ZHANG Weihua1, LIU Xiaofeng1, WANG Kun1   

  1. (1.School of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui, P.R.China;2.Traffic Management Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security,Wuxi 214151,Jiangsu,P.R.China)
  • Received:2015-06-01 Revised:2015-08-30 Online:2016-08-20 Published:2016-08-20

PDF

摘要： 修订中国版驾驶愤怒量表，并检验其在中国驾驶人群体中的效度和信度。采用翻译后并新加入或删除部分题项的驾驶愤怒量表对职业和非职业驾驶人进行测试，共获得有效问卷232份，并通过项目分析、探索性因素分析和效信度分析，完成最终量表的修订。修订后的驾驶愤怒量表包括20项，由交通障碍、无礼驾驶、违规驾驶和低速驾驶4个因素组成；量表各因子与总量表之间的相关系数在0.64~0.84之间，P＜0.01，体现了较好的效度。总量表的内部一致性系数达到了0.90，并且各因素内部一致性均在0.75~0.81，具有较好的稳定性；年龄与违规驾驶得分和交通障碍得分呈负相关（r=-0.14，-0.15）；驾龄与低速驾驶得分呈负相关（r=-0.14）；去年行驶里程数与交通障碍得分、违规驾驶得分、低速驾驶得分和总量表得分均呈现负相关（r=-0.22，-0.38，-0.25，-0.24）；总驾驶里程数与交通障碍得分、违规驾驶得分、低速驾驶得分和总量表得分均呈现负相关（r=-0.20，-0.36，-0.21，-0.26）；非职业驾驶人的违规驾驶得分和低速驾驶得分高于职业驾驶人，均 P＜0.05。修订版的驾驶愤怒量表符合中国驾驶人文化背景和驾驶习惯，体现了良好的效度和信度，可以用来作为评估驾驶愤怒和后续驾驶行为研究的测量工具。

关键词: 交通运输工程, 驾驶愤怒量表, 交通障碍, 驾驶行为

Abstract: To revise Chinese driving anger scale and check its reliability and validity for Chinese driving crowd, the translated driving anger scale with some items added or removed was applied to test the professional and non-professional drivers and total 232 valid questionnaires were obtained. A finalized Chinese version of DAS was achieved through the project analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability and validity test. The total driving anger scale revised consisted of 20 items, which contained 4 dimensions: traffic obstructions, discourtesy, illegal driving and slow-speed driving. Pearson correlations between total scale and the factors were in range from 0.64 to 0.84, P＜0.01, which reflected the good validity. The internal consistency coefficient Cronbach’s α of the total scale reached 0.90, and the Cronbach’s α of each subscale were from 0.75 to 0.81, which indicated that the scale had good stability. The driver’s age was negatively correlated with his scores of traffic obstruction and illegal driving （r=-0.14，-0.15）while driving age with slow driving(r=-0.14) ; driving mileage in previous year was negatively correlated with his scores of traffic obstruction, scores of illegal driving, slow driving and sum in the scale（r=-0.22，-0.38，-0.25，-0.24）. The total mileage covered was negatively correlated with the scores of traffic obstruction, illegal driving, slow driving and sum in the scale table (r=-0.20,-0.36,-0.21,-0.26). The non-professional driver’s scores of illegal driving and slow driving were higher than the same of professionals and P＜0.05. The revised driving anger scale conforms to Chinese culture and driving habits thus presenting good reliability and validity and thus can be used as a measuring tool for driving anger assessment and subsequent study on driving behaviors.

Key words: traffic and transportation engineering, driving anger scale(DAS), traffic obstructions, driving behaviors

中图分类号: