双组分环氧树脂抗滑薄层抗滑及力学性能研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.12.12

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 74-79.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.12.12

双组分环氧树脂抗滑薄层抗滑及力学性能研究

谢群1，王全磊2,3，王火明2，徐周聪2

(1. 江西省赣北公路勘察设计院，江西九江 332001； 2. 招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司，重庆 400067； 3. 长安大学公路学院，陕西西安 710064)

收稿日期:2019-09-05 修回日期:2019-10-21 出版日期:2020-12-18 发布日期:2020-12-18
作者简介:谢群（1966—），男，江西赣州人，高级工程师，主要从事道路建材方面的研究。E-mail: wqlchd@163.com 通信作者：王全磊（1989—），男，山东聊城人，博士，主要从事道路建材方面的研究。E-mail: 903699805@qq.com
基金资助:
重庆市社会事业与民生保障科技创新专项项目（cstc2015shms-ztzx30004）；国家自然科学基金项目（51508496）

Sliding Resistance and Mechanical Properties of Two-Component Epoxy Resin Anti-skid Thin Layer

XIE Qun1, WANG Quanlei2,3, WANG Huoming2, XU Zhoucong2

(1. Jiangxi North Jiangxi Highway Survey and Design Institute, Jiujiang 332001, Jiangxi, China; 2. China Merchants Chongqing Communications Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400067, China; 3. School of Highway, Changan University, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, China)

Received:2019-09-05 Revised:2019-10-21 Online:2020-12-18 Published:2020-12-18
Supported by:

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究双组分环氧树脂抗滑薄层的抗滑性能，采用加速加载试验与力学试验相结合的方法，重点探讨了不同集料类型对其抗滑性能的影响。选择SMA-10与改性乳化沥青微表处作为对照组，开展加速加载试验，分析了BPN值、TD值、集料磨耗质量损失率随磨耗时间变化的规律；采用对数公式对抗滑性能的衰减规律进行了拟合回归。通过剪切试验与拉拔试验，分析了不同集料类型与沥青层基面对其力学性能的影响。试验结果表明：双组分环氧树脂抗滑薄层的抗滑性能优于SMA-10与改性乳化沥青微表处；加速加载试验开始后3 h内，抗滑性能衰变速度较快，后期衰减速度较慢并呈缓慢降低趋势；TD值与BPN值随磨耗时间变化的关系与对数公式呈较好的相关性；抗滑薄层与沥青混凝土基面间的剪切强度与黏结强度较高，试件的破坏面均出现于沥青层内部。

关键词: 道路工程, 双组分环氧树脂抗滑薄层, 加速加载试验, 抗滑性能, 剪切强度, 黏结强度

Abstract: In order to study the anti-skid performance of two-component epoxy resin anti-skid thin layer, the accelerated loading test and mechanical test were combined to discuss the influence of different aggregate types on their anti-skid performance. SMA-10 and the modified emulsified asphalt micro-surfacing were selected as control group to carry out the accelerated loading test. The variation rule of BPN, TD and aggregate abrasion mass loss rate changing with time was analyzed, and the attenuation law of anti-skid performance was fitted and regressed by logarithmic formula. Through shear test and drawing test, the influence of different aggregate types and asphalt base surfaces on their mechanical properties was analyzed. The experimental results show that:the skid resistance of the two-component epoxy resin anti-skid thin layer is better than that of SMA-10 and the modified emulsified asphalt micro-surfacing;within 3 hours after the start of accelerated loading test,the attenuation speed of anti-skid performance is relatively fast, and the attenuation speed is slow in the later stage and trends to decrease slowly;the relationship of TD and BPN changing with wear time has a good correlation with logarithmic formula;the shear strength and bond strength between the anti-skid thin layer and the asphalt concrete base surface are relatively high, and the failure surfaces of the specimens occur inside the asphalt layer.

Key words: highway engineering, two-component epoxy resin anti-skid thin layer, accelerated loading test, anti-skid performance, shear strength, bond strength

中图分类号:

U 414

谢群1，王全磊2,3，王火明2，徐周聪2. 双组分环氧树脂抗滑薄层抗滑及力学性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 74-79.

XIE Qun1, WANG Quanlei2,3, WANG Huoming2, XU Zhoucong2. Sliding Resistance and Mechanical Properties of Two-Component Epoxy Resin Anti-skid Thin Layer[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2020, 39(12): 74-79.

参考文献

［1］周威，赵辉，文俊，等.复配固化剂对环氧沥青结构和性能的影响［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版)，2013，32(4)：601-605.
ZHOU Wei, ZHAO Hui, WEN Jun, et al. Effects of compound curing agent on structure and properties of epoxy-asphalt［J］. Journalof Chongqing Jiaotong
University(Natural Science), 2013,32(4):601-605.
［2］黄明，黄卫东.环氧沥青固化剂的一些相关问题研究［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版)，2009，28(5)：883-886.
HUANG Ming, HUANG Weidong. Severalrelative problems of epoxy asphalt solidifiers［J］. Journalof Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2009, 28(5): 883-
886.
［3］李强，王永维，李桂琴，等.彩色树脂抗滑薄层罩面技术在青海省道S103的应用研究［J］.中外公路，2018，38(3)：39-43.
LI Qiang, WANG Yongwei, LI Guiqin, et al. Application ofcolor resin anti-skid thin layer covering technology in Qinghai Provincial Road S103［J］. Journal of China
& Foreign Highway, 2018, 38(3): 39-43.
［4］王火明，杨建国，李汝凯，等.毫米级超薄彩色抗滑表层材料Puas性能研究［J］.公路交通技术，2017，33(2)：5-10.
WANG Huoming, YANG Jianguo, LI Rukai, et al. Study on performance of millimeter level ultra-thin colored anti-skid surface material, Puas［J］. Technology of
Highway and Transport, 2017, 33(2): 5-10.
［5］钟鸣.改性环氧树脂薄层铺装在桥面养护中的应用［J］.中外公路，2013，33(6)：290-294.
ZHONG Ming. Application of modified epoxy resin thin layer pavement in bridge deck maintenance［J］. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2013, 33(6): 290-294.
［6］王勇，袁腾，杨建波，等.基于加速磨耗的沥青路面抗滑性能衰减特性研究［J］.筑路机械与施工机械化，2016，33(1)：71-74.
WANG Yong, YUAN Teng, YANG Jianbo, et al. Research on skid resistance attenuation of asphalt pavement by accelerated wear［J］. Road Machinery & Construction
Mechanization, 2016, 33(1):71-74.
［7］ BEER M D. Measurements of Tire/Pavement Interface Stresses under Moving Wheel Loads［R］. CSIR, South Africa: Division of Roads and Transport Technology,
1994.
［8］ KANG Yang, SONG Mingyu, PU Liang, et al. Rheological behaviors of epoxy asphalt binder in comparison of base asphalt binder and SBS modified asphalt binder［
J］. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 76: 343-350.
［9］ AHAMMED M A, TIGHE S. Effect of short-term and long-term weather on pavement surface friction［J］.International Journal of Pavement Research & Technology,
2010, 3(6):295-302.
［10］董昭.加速磨耗试验与沥青路面材料抗滑性能衰变规律研究［D］.西安：长安大学，2011.
DONG Zhao.Study on Accelerated Polishing Test and the Regularity of Skid Resistance Degradation of Asphalt Pavement Material［D］. Xian: Changan University,
2011.
［11］曾峰，张肖宁.沥青路面预防性养护技术研究进展及关键问题［J］.中外公路，2009，29(4)：74-80.
ZENG Feng, ZHANG Xiaoning. Research progress and key problems of preventive maintenance technology of asphalt pavement［J］.Journal of China & Foreign Highway,
2009, 29(4):74-80.
［12］赵安平，汤爱平，王威.彩色防滑路面涂料性能及应用［J］.筑路机械与施工机械化，2013，30(2)：31-34.
ZHAO Anping, TANG Aiping, WANG Wei. Material sproperties and application of colored anti-skid pavement［J］.Road Machinery & Construction Mechanization, 2013, 30
(2):31-34.
［13］ KANGKHAJITRE C, KANITPONG K. Effect of aggregate characteris-tics on texture and skid resistance of asphalt pavement surface［J］. Journal of the Eastern
Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2011, 9: 1210-1224.
［14］ XU Ming, PAN Xiaodong, DENG Qi. Setting method of thin-layer antiskid colored pavement in tunnel based on increasing luminance of pavement［C］∥The Twelfth
COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals.U.S.A.: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2012:3073-3083.
［15］王丹.石灰岩与玄武岩混合集料沥青路面表层抗滑性能研究［D］.重庆：重庆交通大学，2015.
WANG Dan. Asphalt Pavement Skid Resistance of the Surface Mixed Limestone and Basalt Aggregate［D］. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2015.
［16］黄宝涛，田伟平，李家春，等.沥青路面抗滑性能定量评价的分形方法［J］.中国公路学报，2008，21(4)：12-17.
HUANG Baotao, TIAN Weiping, LI Jiachun, et al. Fractal method based on quantitative evaluation of asphalt pavement anti-slide performance［J］. China Journal of
Highway and Transport, 2008, 21(4):12-17.
［17］ MENGESHA A B, RICHARD C M, NELSON H G, et al. Forensic investigation of the cause(s) of slippery ultra-thin bonded wearing course of an asphalt pavement:
Influence of aggregate mineralogical compositions［J］. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2015(4):136-149.
［18］桂志敬，刘清泉，陈学文，等.动态摩擦系数测试仪的应用研究［J］.公路交通科技，2005，22(3)：39-41.
GUI Zhijing, LIU Qingquan, CHEN Xuewen,et al. Application study of dynamic friction tester［J］.Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,
2005, 22(3):39-41.
［19］ GENDY A E, SHALABY A. Mean profile depth of pavement surface macrotexture using photometric stereo techniques［J］. Journal of Transportation Engineering,
2007, 133(7):433-440.
［20］交通部公路科学研究所.公路工程集料试验规程：JTG E42—2005 ［S］.北京：人民交通出版社，2005.
Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport.Test Methods of Aggregate for Highway Engineering: JTG E42—2005［S］. Beijing: China Communications Press,
2005.
［21］交通部公路科学研究院.公路路基路面现场测试规程：JTG E60—2008［S］.北京：人民交通出版社，2008.
Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport.Field Test Methods of Subgrade and Pavement for Highway Engineering: JTG E60—2008［S］. Beijing: China
Communications Press, 2008.

[1]	张淑宝. 一种中央分隔带分离式改进混凝土护栏的研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 107-111.
[2]	赵伟. 纳米蒙脱石/SBS复掺改性沥青性能试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 118-122.
[3]	郭鹏1，陈思贤1，曹志国1，刘俊1，孟建玮2，鲜江林3. 复配废机油再生剂的制备及性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 87-91.
[4]	肖庆一1,2，赵鹏1，孙博伟3，张怡4，丁啸5. 废植物油再生沥青结合料性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 92-98.
[5]	何丽红1,2,温仙仙1,2,侯艺桐1,2,邓稳1,2. 阴离子乳化沥青粒径大小及分布影响因素分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 99-104.
[6]	姚爱玲1，王军伟2，许敏3，杨孟乾4，杨涛1. 水泥稳定碎石基层沥青路面隆起开裂数值分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 105-111.
[7]	赵全满，任瑞波，刘瑶，李志刚，户桂灵. 城市道路检查井井周路面破坏机理[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 87-94.
[8]	王志祥1,2，李建阁1，陈楚鹏2. 基于变权重评价的沥青路面使用性能灰色预测[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 95-101.
[9]	肖庆一1，2，3，封仕杰1，孙立东1，陈向伟1. 碱渣掺量对不同龄期下半刚性再生基层力学性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 102-109.
[10]	潘兵宏1，2，任卉2，单慧敏1，霍永富1. 客货分离整体式路基互通出口同分带开口长度研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 83-90.
[11]	孔令云1，邹胜楠1，黄麟钬2，吴海鹰3，余苗1，杨博1. 复合式路面疲劳裂纹扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 91-97.
[12]	凌天清1，魏巧2，李传强3，袁海2，杨清尘3. 生物柴油-塑料裂解蜡复合温拌改性沥青性能研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 98-104.
[13]	王清洲1，孙超1，檀奥龙2，魏连雨1. 膨胀性泥岩重塑土膨胀力试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 112-117.
[14]	王民1,2，尚飞1，肖丽1，包广志3. 钢桥面浇注式沥青铺装复合梁疲劳损伤规律分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 84-88.
[15]	董仕豪，韩森，尹媛媛，吴松，张启鑫. 基于表面能理论的石灰改性沥青黏附性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 89-97.

双组分环氧树脂抗滑薄层抗滑及力学性能研究

Sliding Resistance and Mechanical Properties of Two-Component Epoxy Resin Anti-skid Thin Layer

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics