封闭和开放的单向冻结条件下饱和砂岩冻胀变形对比试验研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2021.09.15

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (09): 101-108.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2021.09.15

封闭和开放的单向冻结条件下饱和砂岩冻胀变形对比试验研究

夏才初1,2，陈钿浩1，李强3

(1. 绍兴文理学院土木工程学院，浙江绍兴 312000； 2. 同济大学土木工程学院，上海 200092； 3. 阳光城集团股份有限公司，上海 200092)

收稿日期:2020-02-06 修回日期:2020-09-08 出版日期:2021-09-17 发布日期:2021-09-18
作者简介:夏才初(1963—)，男，浙江杭州人，教授，主要从事岩石力学、隧道与地下建筑工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail：tjxiaccb@126.com 通信作者：陈钿浩（1995—），男，浙江绍兴人，硕士研究生，主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究。E-mail：1813523208@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51778475，41472248)

Comparative Experimental Study on Frost Heave Deformation of Saturated Sandstone under Closed and Open Unidirectional Freezing Conditions

XIA Caichu1,2, CHEN Tianhao1, LI Qiang3

(1. College of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3.Yango Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China)

Received:2020-02-06 Revised:2020-09-08 Online:2021-09-17 Published:2021-09-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究实际工程中寒区隧道围岩的冻胀变形规律，分别进行了封闭和开放的单向冻结条件下饱和砂岩冻胀变形的对比试验，研究饱和砂岩在不同环境工况下冻胀变形的规律并加以对比分析。试验表明：饱和砂岩在封闭和开放的单向冻结条件下呈现不均匀冻胀特性，两组试验的冻胀应变变化过程相同，但在各个温度梯度的封闭条件下冻胀速率和冻胀应变值略大于开放条件下冻胀速率和冻胀应变值；在相同温度梯度下发现开放条件的不均匀冻胀系数略小于封闭条件，但随温度梯度增长速率大于封闭条件；两组试验温度场变化都分为快速下降、缓慢下降、稳定3个阶段；试件冻结方向总变形具有3个阶段特征，前两个阶段两组试验类似，为冷缩和缓慢增长阶段，呈第三阶段开放条件下为快速增长阶段，呈线性增长趋势，封闭条件下进入稳定阶段，变形量趋于稳定；封闭条件下试件产生原位冻胀，开放条件下试件先产生原位冻胀，后由于外界水分的补充产生分凝冻胀。

关键词: 隧道工程；封闭和开放条件；饱和砂岩；单向冻结；冻胀变形对比

Abstract: In order to study the law of frost heave deformation of tunnel surrounding rock in cold area in practical engineering, the comparative tests of frost heave deformation of saturated sandstone under closed and open unidirectional freezing conditions were carried out respectively. The law of frost heave deformation of saturated sandstone under different environmental conditions was studied and a comparative analysis was made. The test results show that the saturated sandstone presents uneven frost heave characteristics under closed and open unidirectional freezing conditions, and the change process of frost heave strain is the same in two groups of tests, but the frost heaving rate and strain value of each temperature gradient under closed condition are slightly higher than those under open condition. With the same temperature gradient, it is found that the uneven coefficient of frost heave under open condition is slightly smaller than that under closed condition, but the growth rate of uneven coefficient of frost heave with temperature gradient under open condition is faster than that under closed condition. The changes of temperature field in the two groups of tests are divided into three stages: rapid decline, slow decline and stability. The total deformation of the specimen in the freezing direction has three-stage characteristics. The first two stages of two groups of tests are similar, which are cold shrinkage and slow growth stages. But the third stage is rapid growth stage in the open condition, with a linear growth trend. In the closed condition, it enters the stable stage, and the deformation volume tends to be stable. Through the comparative test, it can be found that the specimen is in-situ frost heaving under the closed condition, and in-situ frost heaving first and then partial frost heaving due to the supplement of external water under the open condition.

Key words: tunnel engineering; closed and open conditions; saturated sandstone; unidirectional freezing; frost heave deformation comparison

中图分类号:

U459.2

夏才初1,2，陈钿浩1，李强3. 封闭和开放的单向冻结条件下饱和砂岩冻胀变形对比试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(09): 101-108.

XIA Caichu1,2, CHEN Tianhao1, LI Qiang3. Comparative Experimental Study on Frost Heave Deformation of Saturated Sandstone under Closed and Open Unidirectional Freezing Conditions[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2021, 40(09): 101-108.

参考文献

［1］张玉强，杨勇，夏才初，等.衬砌水化热对隧道内热交换管换热量的影响［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版)，2015，34(6)：32-36,52.
ZHANG Yuqiang，YANG Yong，XIA Caichu，et al. Effect of hydration heat induced by lining on heat transfer rate of heat exchange pipes buried in tunnels［J］.Journal
of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science)，2015，34(6)：32-36,52.
［2］张玉伟，谢永利，李又云，等.基于温度场时空分布特征的寒区隧道冻胀模型［J］.岩土力学，2018，39(5)：1625-1632.
ZHANG Yuwei，XIE Yongli，LI Youyun，et al. A frost heave model based on space-time distribution of temperature field in cold region tunnels［J］. Rock and Soil
Mechanics，2018，39(5)：1625-1632.
［3］ LAI Yuanming，WU Hui，WU Ziwang，et al. Analytical viscoelastic solution for frost force in cold-region tunnels［J］.Cold Regions Science and Technology，2000
，31(3)：227-234.
［4］黄继辉，夏才初，韩常领，等.考虑围岩不均匀冻胀的寒区隧道冻胀力解析解［J］.岩石力学与工程学报，2015，34(增刊2)：3766-3774.
HUANG Jihui，XIA Caichu，HAN Changling，et al.The analytical solution of frost heave force acting on cold-region tunnel liner considering the anisotropy frost heaving
of the surrounding rock［J］.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2015，34(Sup 2)：3766-3774.
［5］黄继辉.寒区隧道冻胀力计算理论与衬砌结构设计方法研究［D］.上海：同济大学，2015.
HUANG Jihui.Frost Heave Force Calculation Theory and Lining Structure Design Method for Cold Region Tunnels［D］.Shanghai：Tongji University，2015.
［6］中村大，後藤隆司，伊藤陽司，等.岩石と土の凍上特性の差異に関する実験的検証［J］.土木学会論文集C，2010，66(3)： 472-486.
NAKAMURA D，TAKASHI G，YOUJI I，et al.Experimental verification of differences in frost heaving characteristics between rocks and soils［J］.Proceedings of Civil
Society C，2010，66(3)：472-486.
［7］ NAKAMURA D，GOTO T，ITO Y，et al.A Basic study on frost susceptibility of rock: Differences between frost susceptibility of rock and soil［C］∥ Proceedings of
14th Conference on Cold Regions Engineering.Duluth:［s.n.］，2009：89-98.
［8］夏才初，李强，吕志涛，等.各向均匀与单向冻结条件下饱和岩石冻胀变形特性对比试验研究［J］.岩石力学与工程学报，2018，37(2)：274-281.
XIA Caichu，LI Qiang，LYU Zhitao，et al.Comparative experimental study on frost deformation characteristics of saturated rock under uniform freezing and uni-
directional freezing conditions ［J］.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2018，37(2)：274-281.
［9］ MATSUOKA N. Mechanisms of rock breakdown by frost action:An experimental approach［J］.Cold Regions Science and Technology，1990，17(3)：253-270.
［10］ MURTON J B，COUTARD J P，LAUTRIDOU J P，et al. Physical modelling of bedrock brecciation by ice segregation in permafrost［J］.Permafrost and Periglacial
Processes，2001，12(3)：255-266.
［11］ MURTON J B，PETERSON R，OZOUF J C.Bedrock fracture by ice segregation in cold regions［J］.Science，2006，314(5802):1127-1129.
［12］ AKAGAWA S，FUKUDA M.Frost heave mechanism in welded tuff［J］.Permafrost and Periglacial Processes，1991，2(4)：301-309.
［13］吕志涛，夏才初，李强，等.单向冻结时开放条件下饱和砂岩冻胀试验及THM耦合冻胀模型［J］.岩土工程学报，2019，41(8)：1435-1444.
LYU Zhitao，XIA Caichu，LI Qiang，et al.Frost heave experiments on saturated sandstone under unidirectional freezing condition in an open system and the coupled
THM frost heave model［J］.Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2019，41(8)：1435-1444.
［14］黄文峰.湖冰微结构及其对热、力学参数影响的研究［D］.大连：大连理工大学，2013.
HUANG Wenfeng.Study on Lake Ice Microstructure and Its Effects on Thermal and Mechanical Parameters［D］.Dalian：Dalian University of Technology，2013.
［15］李强.封闭和开放条件下岩石冻胀性试验研究［D］.上海：同济大学，2017.
LI Qiang.Experimental Study on Frost Heave of Rock Under Closed and Open Conditions［D］.Shanghai：Tongji University，2017.
［16］张婷.人工冻土冻胀、融沉特性试验研究［D］.南京：南京林业大学，2004.
ZHANG Ting. Experimental Study on Frost Heave and Thaw Settlement Characteristics of Artificial Frozen Soil［D］.Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University，2004.
［17］ MING Feng，LI Dongqing. Experimental and theoretical investigations on frost heave in porous media［J］.Mathematical Problems in Engineering，2015：
198986.1-198986.9.

[1]	赵宁雨1，2，吕陈伏1，陈弘杨1，胡诗林1. 高海拔长大隧道压入式施工通风的合理长度研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(03): 94-99.
[2]	曹正卯，张琦，陈建忠. 羊鹿山隧道20 MW火灾全射流纵向排烟全比尺试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(03): 123-128.
[3]	杨仲杰1，吴洁2，张俊儒3. 基于围岩二次应力特征的单跨四车道高速公路隧道合理高跨比的解析计算[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(03): 129-135.
[4]	孟凡琨，陈广交，巨永锋，杜凯. 公路养护施工中的交通控制与管理[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 32(1): 83-86.
[5]	李强, 郭军, 夏铃. 公路隧道衬砌火灾后力学行为分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010, 29(5): 693-696.
[6]	徐林生. 财神梁隧道台阶法开挖施工数值模拟研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 27(4): 548-551.
[7]	陈林杰, 蒋树屏, 丁浩. 公路隧道外水压力折减规律研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 27(3): 383-386,404.
[8]	高攀科, 徐林生. 公路连拱隧道中隔墙的若干技术问题[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 27(3): 396-399.
[9]	范小伟, 徐林生. 长冲隧道进口段开挖方法的优化分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2008, 27(2): 225-227,289.
[10]	杨轸，郭忠印. 隧道路面抗滑性能测定及其对行车安全影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2006, 25(6): 38-42.
[11]	邓仁清. 范家岭隧道大坍方处理技术[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2006, 25(5): 37-39.
[12]	徐林生，李永林，程崇国. 公路隧道围岩变形破裂类型与等级的判定[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2002, 21(2): 16-20.

封闭和开放的单向冻结条件下饱和砂岩冻胀变形对比试验研究

Comparative Experimental Study on Frost Heave Deformation of Saturated Sandstone under Closed and Open Unidirectional Freezing Conditions

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics