中文核心期刊
CSCD来源期刊
中国科技核心期刊
RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2005, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 99-103.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

边坡稳定性计算方法的对比分析

王肇慧, 肖盛燮, 刘文方   

  1. 重庆交通学院 土木建筑学院, 重庆 400074
  • 收稿日期:2004-10-22 修回日期:2004-12-02 出版日期:2005-12-15 发布日期:2016-11-09
  • 作者简介:王肇慧(1977-),女,江西省南昌市人,研究生,从事防灾减灾工程及防护工程方面的研究

Comparison of analytical methods for slope stability

WANG Zhao-hui, XIAO Sheng-xie, LIU Wen-fang   

  1. School of Civil Engineering & Architecture, Chongqing jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
  • Received:2004-10-22 Revised:2004-12-02 Online:2005-12-15 Published:2016-11-09

摘要: 将目前运用得较为广泛的极限平衡法中几种边坡稳定性计算方法进行了对比分析.研究其各自的适用条件、计算精度,通过对3个算例稳定系数进行比较,得出结论:直线滑动面法计算的稳定性系数偏于不安全,而瑞典条分法偏于安全,简化的毕肖普法计算的结果则比较接近实际.

关键词: 边坡稳定性, 计算方法, 极限平衡法, 对比分析

Abstract: Several widely used analytical methods for slope stability that were derived from the ultimate equilibrium theory are compared in this paper. Their applicable range and accuracy have been discussed respectively and verified with three practical examples. It is concluded from the results of analyses that:the result from linear slip surface method is a bit high; on the contrary Sweden circular slice method is a bit conservative; the simplified Bishop method can be used effectively in evaluating slope stability.

Key words: slope stability, analytical method, ultimate equilibrium theory, comparison

中图分类号: