低雷诺数下类方柱绕流的数值模拟研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.05.08

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (05): 49-57.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.05.08

低雷诺数下类方柱绕流的数值模拟研究

杜晓庆1, 2，刘延泰1，施定军1，马文勇3

(1. 上海大学土木工程系，上海 200444； 2. 上海大学风工程和气动控制研究中心，上海 200444； 3. 石家庄铁道大学风工程研究中心，河北石家庄 050043)

收稿日期:2018-12-20 修回日期:2019-04-17 出版日期:2020-05-26 发布日期:2020-06-18
作者简介:杜晓庆(1973―)，男，江苏无锡人，教授，博士，主要从事结构风工程方面的研究。 E-mail: dxq@shu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51578330)；河北省自然科学基金项目(E2017210107)

Numerical Simulation on Flow around Analogous Square Cylinders at Low Reynolds Number

DU Xiaoqing1,2，LIU Yantai1，SHI Dingjun1，MA Wenyong3

(1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; 2. Wind Engineering and Aerodynamic Flow Control Research Center, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; 3. Wind Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, Hebei, China)

Received:2018-12-20 Revised:2019-04-17 Online:2020-05-26 Published:2020-06-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了改进标准方柱(直边尖角柱)的气动性能，以经过角(尖角、圆角)、边(直边、凹边和凸边)形状修正的类方柱为研究对象，采用非定常数值模拟方法，在低雷诺数下研究了6类二维柱体在不同风向角下的气动性能和流场特性。研究结果表明：对标准方柱的角、边形状的修正可明显改变其绕流场结构，会改善或劣化其气动性能；与直边柱体相比，凸边柱体的气动力系数和风压系数明显减小，而凹边柱体的气动力系数和风压系数均有增大的趋势；与尖角柱体相比，圆角化后柱体的气动力系数在所有风向角下呈整体下降趋势，Strouhal数增大；从总体上看，在研究的6类柱体中，凸边圆角柱的气动性能最好，凹边尖角柱的气动性能最差。

关键词: 桥梁工程, 方柱绕流, 数值模拟, 气动控制, 气动性能, 流场结构

Abstract: In order to improve the aerodynamic performance of the standard square cylinder with sharp corners and straight edges, taking analogous square cylinder modified by the shape of angle (sharp angle, fillet) and edge (straight edge, concave edge and convex edge) as research objects, the aerodynamic performance and flow field characteristics of six kinds of two-dimensional cylinders with different wind direction angles were studied under low Reynolds number by using unsteady numerical simulation method. Research results show that the modification of the angle and edge shape of the standard square cylinder can obviously change the flow field structure and improve or degrade its aerodynamic performance. Compared with the straight edge cylinder, the aerodynamic coefficient and the wind pressure coefficient of the convex edge cylinder decrease obviously, while those of the concave edge cylinder intend to increase. Compared with the sharp corner cylinder, the aerodynamic coefficient of the rounded cylinder shows a trend to decrease in all wind direction angles, and the Strouhal number increases. On the whole, among the six types of cylinder studied, the aerodynamic performance of the convex edge cylinder with rounded corners is the best, and that of the concave edge cylinder with sharp corners is the worst.

Key words: bridge engineering, flow around square cylinder, numerical simulation, aerodynamic control, aerodynamic characteristic, flow field structure

中图分类号:

U442
TU973

杜晓庆1, 2，刘延泰1，施定军1，马文勇3. 低雷诺数下类方柱绕流的数值模拟研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(05): 49-57.

DU Xiaoqing1,2，LIU Yantai1，SHI Dingjun1，MA Wenyong3. Numerical Simulation on Flow around Analogous Square Cylinders at Low Reynolds Number[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2020, 39(05): 49-57.

参考文献

［1］余先锋, 谢壮宁, 刘慕广,等. 超高层建筑顺风向加速度的干扰效应研究［J］. 工程力学, 2017, 34(12):143-149.
YU Xianfeng， XIE Zhuangning， LIU Muguang，et al. Interference effects on along-wind acceleration between two high-rise buildings ［J］. Engineering Mechanics，
2017, 34(12):143-149.
［2］唐浩俊, 李永乐, 胡朋. 串列双塔柱风荷载及涡振性能研究［J］. 工程力学, 2013, 30(1):378-383.
TANG Haojun, LI Yongle, HU Peng. Wind loads and vortex-induced vibration of two tower columns in tandem arrangement［J］.Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(1):378-
383.
［3］ MOONEGHI M A, KARGARMOAKHAR R. Aerodynamic mitigation and shape optimization of buildings: Review ［J］. Journal of Building Engineering, 2016, 6:225-235.
［4］ ALAGHMANDAN M, ELNIMEIRI M. Reducing impact of wind on tall buildings through design and aerodynamic modifications (Architectural and structural concepts to
mitigate wind effect on tall buildings)［C］∥ Architectural Engineering Conference, 2013:847-856.
［5］ SHARMA A, MITTAL H, GAIROLA A. Mitigation of wind load on tall buildings through aerodynamic modifications: Review ［J］. Journal of Building Engineering,
2018,18:180-194.
［6］赵昕, 林祯杉, 孙华华. 超高层建筑形态空气动力学优化方法应用综述［J］. 结构工程师, 2011, 27(3):133-139.
ZHAO Xin, LIN Zhenshan, SUN Huahua. Aerodynamic modification methods for high-rise buildings［J］.Structural Engineers, 2011, 27(3):133-139.
［7］顾明, 张正维, 全涌. 降低超高层建筑横风向响应气动措施研究进展［J］. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(3):317-323.
GU Ming, ZHANG Zhengwei, QUAN Yong. Aerodynamic measures for mitigation of across-wind responses of super tall buildings: State of the art［J］. Journal of Tongji
University (Natural Science), 2013, 41(3):317-323.
［8］ TAMURA T, MIYAGI T, KITAGISHI T. Numerical prediction of unsteady pressures on a square cylinder with various corner shapes［J］. Journal of Wind Engineering
and Industrial Aerodynamics,1998, 74-76:531-542.
［9］ TAMURA T, MIYAGI T. The effect of turbulence on aerodynamic forces on a square cylinder with various corner shapes［J］. Journal of Wind Engineering and
Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999, 83(1-3):135-145.
［10］ CAO Y, TAMURA T. Supercritical flows past a square cylinder with rounded corners［J］. Physics of Fluids, 2017, 29:085110.
［11］ CAO Y, TAMURA T. Shear effects on flows past a square cylinder with rounded corners at Re=2.2×104［J］. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial
Aerodynamics, 2018, 174:119-132.
［12］ TAMURA Y, KIM Y C, TANAKA H, et al. Aerodynamic and Tamura response characteristics of supertall buildings with various configurations［C］∥ Eighth Asia-
Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, 2013:K-219-K-243.
［13］ KWOK K C S, WILHELM P A, WILKIE B G. Effect of edge configuration on wind-induced response of tall buildings［J］. Engineering Structures, 1988, 10(2):135-
140.
［14］ KAWAI H. Effect of corner modifications on aeroelastic instabilities of tall buildings［J］. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1998,
74-76:719-729.
［15］ HU J C, ZHOU Y, DALTON C. Effects of the corner radius on the near wake of a square prism［J］. Experiments in Fluids, 2006, 40:106-118.
［16］ ELSHAER A, BITSUAMLAK G, DAMATTY A E. Aerodynamic shape optimization for corners of tall buildings using CFD［C］∥ 14th International Conference on Wind
Engineering, Porto Alegre,2015.
［17］ LI Y,TIAN X,TEE K F, et al. Aerodynamic treatments for reduction of wind loads on high-rise buildings［J］. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial
Aerodynamics, 2018, 172:107-115.
［18］ DEY P, DAS A K R. A numerical study on effect of corner radius and Reynolds number on fluid flow over a square cylinder［J］. Sādhanā, 2017,42:1155-1165.
［19］ ELSHAER A, BITSUAMLAK G, DAMATTY A E. Enhancing wind performance of tall buildings using corner aerodynamic optimization［J］. Engineering Structures, 2017,
136:133-148.
［20］ HINSBERG N P V, SCHEWE G, JACOBS M. Experiments on the aerodynamic behaviour of square cylinders with rounded corners at Reynolds numbers up to 12 million［
J］. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2017, 74:214-233.
［21］ DELANY N K, SORENSEN N E. Low-Speed Drag of Cylinders of Various Shapes［R］. Washington, D.C.: National National Advisory Commitee for Aeronautics, 1953.
［22］ CARASSALE L, FREDA A, MARR-BRUNENGHI M. Effects of free-stream turbulence and corner shape on the galloping instability of square cylinders［J］. Journal
of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2013, 123(Part B):274-280.
［23］ CARASSALE L, FREDA A, MARR-BRUNENGHI M. Experimental investigation on the aerodynamic behavior of square cylinders with rounded corners［J］. Journal of
Fluids and Structures, 2014, 44:195-204.
［24］ ZHANG W, SAMTANEY R. Low-Re flow past an isolated cylinder with rounded corners［J］. Computers & Fluids, 2016, 136:384-401.
［25］ TAMURA T, OHTA I, KUWAHARA K. On the reliability of two-dimensional simulation for unsteady flows around a cylinder-type structure［J］.Journal of Wind
Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1990, 35:275-298.
［26］ SOHANKAR A, NORBERG C, DAVIDSON L. Low-Reynolds-number flow around a square cylinder at incidence: Study of blockage, onset of vortex shedding and outlet
boundary condition［J］. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2015, 26(1):39-56.
［27］ SHARMA A, ESWARAN V. Heat and fluid flow across a square cylinder in the two-dimensional laminar flow regime［J］. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A:
Applications, 2004, 45(3):247-269.
［28］ DE A K, DALAL A. Numerical simulation of unconfined flow past a triangular cylinder［J］. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2006, 52
(7):801-821.
［29］ YOON D H, YANG K S, CHOI C B. Flow past a square cylinder with an angle of incidence［J］. Physics of Fluids, 2010, 22:043603.

[1]	周建庭1,2，黎娅2，张洪2，夏润川2，杨文琦2. 基于自发漏磁检测的钢绞线两点腐蚀试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 74-81.
[2]	张华1，张正琦2 ，程高3，4，田伯科1. 黄土地区陡崖坡段桩基合理临坡距研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 93-98.
[3]	刘金春，宋子轩，梁栋. 单箱三室连续梁桥在横向温度梯度与汽车偏载下的空间效应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 80-86.
[4]	郑植1,2，耿波2，袁佩2，李嵩林2，胡正涛3. 桥墩复合材料防船撞装置新型连接试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 66-73.
[5]	张阳1，屈少钦1，卢九章2，霍文斌3. UHPC纤维定向法及对受拉性能影响[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 74-80.
[6]	傅立磊. 基于随机激励响应的参数识别相关函数法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 70-75.
[7]	苏小波1，肖林2. 空间刚架结构钢-混结合段合理构造模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 76-82.
[8]	梁宗保1，柴洁1，纳守勇2，马天立1，唐玉1. 基于深度学习的桥梁健康监测数据有效性分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(03): 78-83.
[9]	唐启智1,辛景舟1,2,周建庭1,付雷1,3,张俊4. 基于时序分析的锈蚀RC拱损伤识别：仿真与验证[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(02): 69-77.
[10]	戎贤1,2，杨洪渭1，张健新1,2. 带钢端头的装配式混凝土梁柱中节点滞回性能试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(02): 78-82.
[11]	刘小会，许杨，陈思甜，徐略勤. 人行悬索桥地震响应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 65-71.
[12]	琚利平1，王银辉2，陆晓宏3，单继栋4. 行车落物作用下钢筋混凝土箱梁破坏形态分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 72-78.
[13]	曹力桥1，王志斌2，周丁恒3. PBA车站扣拱施工顺序对上部跨河桥沉降影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(01): 79-86.
[14]	王桢1,2，周建庭1,3，张劲泉1,4，吴海军1，吴月星1. 现浇分段长度对万吨级平转斜拉桥受力的影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 44-52.
[15]	郝宪武，舒鹏，郝键铭. 大跨度非对称悬索桥的静风稳定性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 53-59.

低雷诺数下类方柱绕流的数值模拟研究

Numerical Simulation on Flow around Analogous Square Cylinders at Low Reynolds Number

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics