居住型和办公型步行道环境需求特性差异分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.07.02

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (07): 8-14.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.07.02

• 交通+大数据人工智能 • 上一篇下一篇

居住型和办公型步行道环境需求特性差异分析

朱顺应，安静仪，王红，邹禾，肖文彬

(武汉理工大学交通学院，湖北武汉 430063)

收稿日期:2019-07-03 修回日期:2020-05-07 出版日期:2020-07-16 发布日期:2020-07-21
作者简介:朱顺应(1967—)，男，安徽安庆人，教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为交通运输规划与管理、道路交通安全等。E-mail:zhusy2001@163.com 通信作者：安静仪(1995—)，女，湖北武汉人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为交通运输规划与管理。E-mail:anjingyi1995@163.com

Differences in Environmental Demand Characteristics between Residential and Office Walkway

ZHU Shunying, AN Jingyi, WANG Hong, ZOU He, XIAO Wenbin

(School of Communications, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China)

Received:2019-07-03 Revised:2020-05-07 Online:2020-07-16 Published:2020-07-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为创建更具吸引力的步行环境，运用三因素理论及拓扑集合论分析了行人对居住型和办公型步行道环境需求特性的差异。首先，构建了步行道环境满意度指标体系，开展行人满意度调查；其次，根据总体满意度将行人分为满意及不满意2个群体，并用人工神经网络确定了这2个群体的满意度影响因子作用系数W；最后，基于三因素理论，提出并计算了影响因子弹性系数a，根据a将步行道需求分为基本型需求、发展型需求和激励型需求等3类，根据影响因子弹性系数曲线的走势，并用拓扑集合论对比分析了行人对居住型和办公型步行道需求特性。结果表明：在基本型需求方面，行人对居住型和办公型步行道均有通达性要求；在发展型需求方面，行人更加注重居住型步行道的美观性、舒适性和安全性，而对办公型步行道则要求便捷性；居住型和办公型步行道在激励型需求中的表现与在发展型需求中的表现相反。

关键词: 交通工程, 城市交通, 需求特性, 三因素理论, 居住型步行道, 办公型步行道

Abstract: In order to create a more attractive pedestrian environment, the three-factor theory and topological set theory were used to analyze the difference of pedestrian demand for the environment of residential and office walkway. Firstly, a walkway satisfaction index system was constructed and the pedestrian satisfaction survey was carried out. Secondly, according to the overall satisfaction, the pedestrians were divided into two groups, including satisfaction ones and dissatisfaction ones. And the artificial neural network was used to determine the effect coefficient W of influencing factors of satisfaction of the two groups. Finally, based on the three-factor theory, the elastic coefficient a of influencing factors was proposed and analyzed. According to a, the demand for walkway can be divided into three categories: basic demand, development demand and incentive demand. According to the trend of the elastic coefficient curve of the influencing factors, the demand characteristics of pedestrian for residential and office walkway were analyzed by using the topological set theory. The results show that: in terms of basic demand, pedestrians have accessibility requirements for both residential and office walkway; in terms of development demand, pedestrians pay more attention to the beauty, comfort and safety of residential walkway, while the convenience of office walkway is required; the performance of residential and office walkway in incentive demand is opposite to that in development demand.

Key words: traffic engineering, urban traffic, demand characteristics, three-factor theory, residential walkway, office walkway

中图分类号:

U121

朱顺应，安静仪，王红，邹禾，肖文彬. 居住型和办公型步行道环境需求特性差异分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(07): 8-14.

ZHU Shunying, AN Jingyi, WANG Hong, ZOU He, XIAO Wenbin. Differences in Environmental Demand Characteristics between Residential and Office Walkway[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2020, 39(07): 8-14.

参考文献

［1］李嘉，邓敏.用BP-PLS方法评价城市路侧带行人服务水平［J］.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2014,33(3):115-118,154.
LI Jia, DENG Min. Evaluation of pedestrian service level for sidewalks based on BP-PLS model ［J］. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science),
2014, 33(3):115-118,154.
［2］ ZAKARIA J, UJANG N. Comfort of walking in the city center of Kuala Lumpur ［J］. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 170: 642- 652.
［3］ CAIN K L, GAVAND K A, CONWAY T L, et al. Developing and validating an abbreviated version of the microscale audit for pedestrian streetscapes ［J］. Journal
of Transport & Health, 2017, 5: 84-96.
［4］付连宁，邹难.学区交叉口行人流元胞自动机模型［J］.交通运输系统工程与信息,2017,17(3):98-104.
FU Lianning, ZOU Nan. Cellular automata model of pedestrian flow at school intersection ［J］. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information
Technology, 2017, 17(3): 98-104.
［5］张存保，陈峰，韦媛媛，等. 无信号控制路段手机对行人过街行为和安全的影响［J］.交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018,18(2):136-141.
ZHANG Cunbao, CHEN Feng, WEI Yuanyuan, et al. The effects of mobile phone on pedestrian crossing behavior and safety at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks ［J］.
Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(2): 136- 141.
［6］李敏，胡刚钰，黄建中.上海市老年人社区服务设施需求特征研究——基于步行能力差异的视角［J］. 上海城市规划, 2017(1):25-31.
LI Min, HU Gangyu, HUANG Jianzhong. Research on the demand characteristics of community service facilities for the elderly in Shanghai: Based on the perspective of
walking abilities difference ［J］. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2017(1): 25-31.
［7］孟东生，徐宁，刘叶.基于学生日常出行需求的大学校园步行环境研究——以河北工业大学北辰校区为例［J］.艺术与设计(理论), 2018,2(11):55-57.
MENG Dongsheng, XU Ning, LIU Ye. The study of campus walking environment based on students’ daily travel needs is taken as an example of Beichen campus of Hebei
University of Technology ［J］. Art and Design, 2018, 2(11): 55-57.
［8］胡亚飞.城市生活性街道步行停留活动影响因素分析及其应用研究［D］.重庆：重庆大学，2017.
HU Yafei. Study on the Influencing Factors of Walking and Staying Activity in Urban Lifestyle Street and Its Application ［D］. Chongqing: Chongqing University,
2017.
［9］ MATZLER K, SAUERWEIN E. The factor structure of customer satisfaction: An empirical test of the importance grid and the penalty-reward-contrast analysis ［J
］. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 2002, 13(4): 314-332.
［10］ FRIMAN M, FUJII S, ETTEMA D, et al. Psychometric analysis of the satisfaction with travel scale ［J］. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,
2013, 48: 132-145.
［11］ NAJAFI G, GHOBADIAN B, TAVAKOLI T, et al. Performance and exhaust emissions of a gasoline engine with ethanol blended gasoline fuels using artificial neural
network ［J］. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(5): 630-639.
［12］梅羽，李佳玉，王红，等.群体属性对轨道交通乘客满意度的影响分析［J］.公路与汽运,2018(1):49-53.
MEI Yu, LI Jiayu, WANG Hong, et al. Analysis of the influence of group attributes on rail transit passenger satisfaction ［J］. Highways & Automotive Applications,
2018(1): 49-53.

[1]	唐继强1, 2，钟鑫伟2，刘健1，李天瑞3. 基于时间序列季节分类模型的轨道交通客流短期预测[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 31-38.
[2]	连齐才1，李涵1，石小林1，闫章存2. 基于面板数据Mixed logit模型的自动驾驶选择行为分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 46-52.
[3]	戚春华，王笑男，朱守林，李航天. 基于驾驶员视觉兴趣区域的交通工程设施信息量阈值研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(07): 53-60.
[4]	邓天民1，朱杰2，朱凯家1，屈治华3. 基于iForest+Biscting K-means的驾驶风格辨识方法研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 1-6.
[5]	许茂增,张莉. 基于双射软决策理论的路段拥堵影响力识别[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 7-11.
[6]	王涛1，谢思红1，黎文皓1,2，李文勇1. 基于FFOS-ELM和PF的短时交通流自适应预测模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 21-27.
[7]	张诚1，汪成银1，陈志伟2，张正向3，张子磊3. 基于空间流量度的城市路网关键节点挖掘方法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 28-35.
[8]	王永岗，张衡，彭志鹏，周琬琦. 基于结构方程模型的出租车事故影响因素分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 36-42.
[9]	朱顺应，李维吉，林小媛，肖文彬，王红. 特色小镇游客车辆无复检管控点布设研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 52-58.
[10]	潘兵宏1,2，胡炜1，任卉1,单慧敏1. 基于TruckSim仿真下弯道货车侧滑速度模型研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 38-45.
[11]	吴文静，孙刃超，宗芳，贾洪飞. 居民低碳通勤出行的主观态度识别及影响分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 53-58.
[12]	李军，邓育新. 基于非负矩阵分解的出租车时空行为聚类分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(05): 59-65.
[13]	成卫1，刘翔1，雷建明2. 基于RBF神经网络预测的交叉口信号周期时长优化[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 13-18.
[14]	史天亮，王文光. 信息观和粒子群算法在城市交通拥堵中的研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 19-25.
[15]	贺玉龙1,2，刘磊1,2，迟佳欣1,2. 高速公路车辆换道行为风险研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 26-33.

居住型和办公型步行道环境需求特性差异分析

Differences in Environmental Demand Characteristics between Residential and Office Walkway

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics