修订版SCQ-MD量表在机场内场驾驶员的适用性研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.09.07

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (446 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要: 为了检验SCQ-MD（safety climate questionnaire，modified for drivers）量表在测量机场内场驾驶员安全氛围感知的适用性，采用问卷调查及SPSS 22.0统计分析方法对机场内场驾驶员安全氛围感知情况的统计数据进行研究。研究结果表明：SCQ-MD量表各项目与总分之间的相关性均达到显著水平，具有较好的项目区分度；探索性因子分析得到6个因子，共解释72.124%的方差变异，具有良好的结构效度；被试的年龄、驾龄、地区分布、在机场的工作时间等4个人口统计学变量与机场内场驾驶员的安全氛围感知之间具有相关性，与以往研究结果一致，具有较好的准则效度；该量表的Cronbachα系数为0.987，且各个因子的Cronbachs α系数均大于0.9，说明该量表具有良好的信度；引入DBQ量表进行安全氛围与驾驶员不安全行为之间关系实证分析，发现两者之间呈现显著负相关。SCQ-MD量表具有良好的信度和效度，且在应用分析结果上也与以往研究结论一致，说明该量表适用于测量机场内场驾驶员对安全氛围的感知状况。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘玲莉1
	禹美辰1
	王玥1
	云天宇2

关键词 ：交通运输工程, 机场, 驾驶员, 安全氛围, SCQ-MD量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract：In order to assess the applicability of the SCQ-MD (Safety Climate Questionnaire, Modified for Drivers) scale in measuring the safety climate perception of airport drivers, the questionnaire survey and SPSS 22.0 statistical analysis method were used to study the statistical data of safety climate perception of airport drivers. The research results show that the correlation between the items and the total scores of the SCQ-MD scale has reached significant level, with good item discrimination. Six factors obtained by exploratory factor analysis accounts for 72.124% of the variance variation, which has good structural validity. There is a correlation between the four demographic variables of subjects and the perception of safety climate of airport drivers, which is consistent with previous research results and has good criterion validity. And the four demographic variables include age, driving age, regional distribution and working time in the airport of the tested. Cronbachα coefficient of the proposed SCQ-MD is 0.987, and the Cronbach α coefficient of each factor is greater than 0.9, indicating that the proposed scale has good reliability. The DBQ scale is introduced to empirically analyze the relationship between safety climate and drivers unsafe behavior, and finds that there is a significant negative correlation between the two. The SCQ-MD scale has good reliability and validity, and it is consistent with the previous research conclusions in the application analysis results, which indicates that the proposed scale is suitable for measuring the perception of the safe atmosphere of the airport drivers.

Key words ： traffic and transportation engineering, airport, driver, safety climate, SCQ-MD scale, reliability, validity

收稿日期: 2018-08-21

PACS:	U8
	X922

基金资助:中国民航大学科研启动项目（2014QD07S）

作者简介: 刘玲莉（1973—），女，贵州凯里人，副教授，主要从事民航安全管理、质量管理、质量安全管理一体化等民航安全领域方面的研究。E-mail:cauclll@126.com 通信作者：禹美辰（1995—），女，河南郑州人，硕士研究生，主要从事民航安全管理方面的研究。E-mail:13920617612@163.com

引用本文:

刘玲莉1，禹美辰1，王玥1，云天宇2. 修订版SCQ-MD量表在机场内场驾驶员的适用性研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(09): 46-46.
LIU Lingli1, YU Meichen1, WANG Yue1, YUN Tianyu2. Applicability of Revised SCQ-MD Scale in Airport Pilots. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2020, 39(09): 46-46.

链接本文:

http://xbzk.cqjtu.edu.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.09.07 或 http://xbzk.cqjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V39/I09/46

［1］中国民用航空局航空安全办公室，中国民航科学技术研究院.中国民用航空安全信息统计分析报告(2018) ［R］.北京：中国民用航空局，2019.
Aviation Safety Office of Civil Aviation Administration of China, China Academy of Civil Aviation Science and Technology.Report on Statistical Analysis of Civil
Aviation Safety Information of China (2018)［R］. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2019.
［2］中国民用航空局.民用机场航空器活动区道路交通安全管理规则：CCAR-331SB-R1［EB/OL］.（2006-07-12）［2018-08-21］.
http://www.caac.gov.cn/website/old/B1/B6/200701/t20070110_1109.html.
Civil Aviation Administration of China.Rules for Road Traffic Safety Management in Aircraft Activity Area of Civil Airports:CCAR-331SB-R1 ［EB / OL］. （2006-07-12
）［2018-08-21］. http://www.caac.gov.cn/website/old/B1/B6/200701/t20070110_1109.html.
［3］中国民用航空局.民用机场运行安全管理规定：CCAR-140-R1 ［EB/OL］.（2007-12-17）［2018-08-21］.
http://www.caac.gov.cn/XXGK/XXGK/MHGZ/201511/t20151102_8441.html.
Civil Aviation Administration of China.Regulations on Safety Management of Civil Airports Operation:CCAR-140-R1 ［EB / OL］.
http://www.caac.gov.cn/XXGK/XXGK/MHGZ/201511/t20151102_8441.html.
［4］ ZOHAR D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications ［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology,1980,65(1):96-102.
［5］ GLENDON A I, LITHERLAND D K. Safety climate factors, group differences and safety behavior in road construction［J］. Safety Science, 2001, 39(3):157-188.
［6］ WILLS A R, BIGGS H C, WATSON B. Analysis of a safety climate measure for occupational vehicle drivers and implications for safer workplaces［J］. Australian
Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 2005,11(1):8-21.
［7］张灿灿,苏永刚,张红静.文化适应压力量表中文版的修订［J］.山东大学学报(医学版),2015,53(11):89-94.
ZHANG Cancan, SU Yonggang, ZHANG Hongjing. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of acculturative stress scale ［J］. Journal of Shandong University(Health
Science),2015,53(11):89-94.
［8］张力. 安全氛围与驾驶行为关系研究——以北京市出租车司机为例［D］. 北京:北京交通大学,2015.
ZHANG Li. The Relationship between Safety Climate and Drive Behavior—Take the Taxi Driver of Beijing as an Example［D］. Beijing : Beijing Jiaotong University,
2015.
［9］肖惠敏,邝惠容.SF-12量表评价中国老年人生存质量的信度和效度分析［J］.中国老年学杂志,2014,34(04):1018-1020.
XIAO Huimin, KUANG Huirong. Reliability and validity analysis of SF-12 scale for evaluating the quality of SF-12 scale for evaluating the quality of life of
Chinese elderly［J］.Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2014, 34 (4) :1018-1020.
［10］靳文正,虞慧婷.SF-36量表应用于居民自我健康测评的信度和效度研究［J］.中国卫生资源,2012,15(03):265-267.
JIN Wenzheng, YU Huiting. A study of the reliability and validity of SF-36 scale on evaluating health of population［J］. Chinese Health Resources,2012,15(3):265-
267.
［11］ WILLS A R, WATSON B, BIGGS H C. Comparing safety climate factors as predictors of work-related driving behavior［J］. Journal of Safety Research, 2006, 37
(4):375-83.
［12］ REASON J, MANSTEAD A, STRADLING S, et al. Error and violations on the roads: a real distinction?［J］. Ergonomics, 1990,33(10-11):1315-1332.