基于港口环境效益的岸电与泊位联合分配优化研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2023.01.12

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 83-90.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2023.01.12

• 交通+大数据人工智能 • 上一篇下一篇

基于港口环境效益的岸电与泊位联合分配优化研究

闵德权,张志铎,张伟航

(大连海事大学交通运输工程学院，辽宁大连 116026)

收稿日期:2021-07-10 修回日期:2022-03-19 出版日期:2023-02-28 发布日期:2023-03-14
作者简介:闵德权(1963—)，男，上海人，教授，博士，主要从事交通运输管理方面的研究。E-mail：ghsmdq@163.com 闵德权,张志铎,张伟航

Optimization of Joint Allocation of Shore Power and Berth Based on Environmental Benefit of Por

MIN Dequan, ZHANG Zhiduo, ZHANG Weihang

(School of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, Liaoning, China)

Received:2021-07-10 Revised:2022-03-19 Online:2023-02-28 Published:2023-03-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 船舶在港口靠泊期间利用岸电来满足船舶的用电需求，是减少船舶辅机排放的有效措施。以港口供应链整体利益最优为目标，提出了一种兼顾岸电使用成本和环境效益的岸电分配与泊位分配协同优化方案，从而减少岸电系统的使用成本，减少碳排放提高环境效益。基于连续泊位状态分析，在港口提供不同功率情况下，采用多目标遗传优化算法对模型进行求解，确定满足岸电使用成本最小和港口环境效益最大的相对较优解集。最后考虑两种碳税收状况下的排放成本确定最优方案，将优化方案与基础方案进行比较证明模型的有效性，证实模型在靠泊时间和岸电使用不同偏好下具有较好的适用性。

关键词: 交通运输工程, 泊位分配；岸电分配；环境效益

Abstract: It is an effective measure to reduce the emission of ship’s auxiliary engine to meet the demand of ship’s electricity by using shore power during berthing in port. In order to optimize the overall benefits of port supply chain, a synergistic optimization scheme of shore power distribution and berth allocation considering both the cost of shore power use and environmental benefits was proposed, so as to reduce the use cost of shore power system, reduce carbon emissions and improve environmental benefits. Based on continuous berth state analysis, when the port provided different power, the multi-objective genetic optimization algorithm was used to solve the model and determine the relatively optimal solution set that met the minimum cost of shore power utilization and the maximum environmental benefits of the port. Finally, the optimal scheme considering the emission cost under two carbon tax conditions was determined. The comparison between the optimized scheme and the basic scheme proves the validity of the proposed model, and confirms that the proposed model has good applicability under different preferences of berthing time and shore power use.

Key words: traffic and transportation engineering, berth allocation, shore power distribution, environmental benefits

中图分类号:

U692.3

闵德权, 张志铎, 张伟航. 基于港口环境效益的岸电与泊位联合分配优化研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 42(1): 83-90.

MIN Dequan, ZHANG Zhiduo, ZHANG Weihang. Optimization of Joint Allocation of Shore Power and Berth Based on Environmental Benefit of Por[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2023, 42(1): 83-90.

参考文献

［1］ PENG Yun, LI Xiangda, WANG Wenyuan, et al. A simulation-based research on carbon emission mitigation strategies for green container terminals ［J］. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 163(8): 288-298.
［2］ THALIS P. Prospects of cold ironing as an emissions reduction option ［J］. Transportation Research Part A, 2019, 119(9): 82-95.
［3］ WU Lingxiao, WANG Shuaian，AN W. The shore power deployment problem for maritime transportation ［J］. Transportation Research Part E, 2020, 135(11): 1-12.
［4］ WILLIAM J H. Assessment of CO2 and priority pollutant reduction by installation of shoreside power ［J］. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2010, 54(6): 462-467.
［5］ YIN Ming, YI Wang, ZHANG Qiang. Policy implementation barriers and economic analysis of shore power promotion in China ［J］. Transportation Research Part D, 2020, 87(3): 10-27.
［6］ PENG Yun, LI Xiangda, WANG Wenyuan, et al. A method for determining the required power capacity of an on-shore power system considering uncertainties of arriving ships ［J］. Sustainability, 2018, 10(2): 2-17.
［7］ PENG Yun, LI Xiangda, WANG Wenyuan, et al. A method for determining the allocation strategy of on-shore power supply from a green container terminal perspective ［J］. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2019, 167(9): 158- 175.
［8］焦小刚.考虑泊位疏浚的连续型泊位和动态岸桥联合调度［J］.运筹与管理,2020,29(2):47-57.
JIAO Xiaogang. Joint scheduling of continuous berth and dynamic quay bridge considering berth ［J］. Operations Research and Management, 2020, 29 (2): 47-57.
［9］ BIN Jin, XIAO Huiyuan, YAN Bin, et al .Exact and heuristic methods for optimizing lock-quay system in inland waterway ［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 277(9):740-755.
［10］ JUAN F, CORRECHER T, VANDEN B .The berth allocation problem in terminals with irregular layouts ［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 272(2): 1098-1108.
［11］ HSIEN P, HSU T, LIN C. An improved shuffled frog-leaping algorithm for solving the dynamic and continuous berth allocation problem (DCBAP) ［J］. Applied Sciences, 2019, 142(11): 1-28.
［12］张雯钰,郝杨杨.基于船舶作业优先权的靠泊计划仿真优化研究［J］.计算机仿真,2020,37(6):130-134.
ZHANG Wenyu, HAO Yangyang. Simulation and optimization of berthing plan based on ship operational priority ［J］. Computer Simulation, 2020, 37 (6): 130-134 .
［13］ AMIRSALAR M，AHMADIA M，ALINAGHIAN A，et al . Integrated continuous berth allocation and quay crane assignment and scheduling problem with time-dependent physical constraints in container terminals ［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 147(6): 167-144.
［14］那广哲. 集装箱码头动态连续型泊位分配问题研究［D］.大连:大连海事大学,2015:1-63.
NA Guangzhe. Research on Dynamic Continuous Berth Allocation of Container Terminal ［D］. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2015.
［15］ ZHEN Luling, ZHU Gedan, LEE Loohay. Daily berth allocation in a tidal port with channel flow control ［J］. Transportation Research Part B, 2019, 106(4): 193-217 .
［16］李善俊,陈淮莉.基于NSGA II 的带时间窗生鲜品配送路径优化［J］.上海海事大学学报,2020,41（2）:58-41.
LI Shanjun, CHEN Huaili. Optimization of raw food distribution path with time window based on NSGA II ［J］. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University,2020, 41(2):58-41.
［17］ NIKOLETTA L，TRIVYZAA A R. Impact of carbon pricing on the cruise ship energy systems optimal configuration ［J］. Energy, 2019, 175(2): 952-966.
［18］ WANG T S, WANG X C. Joint berth allocation and quay crane assignment under different carbon taxation policies ［J］. Transpor- tation Research Part B, 2018, 117(5): 18-36.

[1]	丁一，张杨. 考虑场桥调度的集装箱码头船舶配载研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 42(1): 91-98.
[2]	高建杰1,2，王永立1，邵毅明1. 基于终点需求可变的市域旅游客流运输均衡分配模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 42(1): 99-106.
[3]	赵星，申珂，严宇威. 基于两阶段模型的城市多模式旅游路径选择[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 42(1): 107-112.
[4]	徐长安, 余娟. 基于逐步Logistics回归的高铁列车上座率影响因素分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 42(1): 128-136.
[5]	赵奉奎，成海飞，苏珊珊，张涌. 基于改进CenterNet的交通场景目标检测技术研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(12): 11-17.
[6]	张汝华1，郭森垚1，施庆利2. 基于信息熵的山东省货运结构演变及动因分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(12): 33-40.
[7]	蒋惠园，丁建军. 基于DEA博弈交叉效率—SDM模型的江苏省沿江八市港口效率研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(12): 56-61.
[8]	张汝华，赵冰. 需求响应式公交运行服务水平指标体系构建与测度研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(11): 41-51.
[9]	黄晓明1,2，洪正强1,2. 基于CarSim软件的道路安全评价技术的现状与展望[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(10): 1-6.
[10]	陈沿伊，侯华保. 考虑时空拥堵和时间窗的多配送中心路径优化[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(10): 26-34.
[11]	翁小雄1，任杰1，覃镇林1，罗瑞发2. 基于深度注意力模型的个体出行多步预测研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(10): 35-40.
[12]	陈坚，彭涛，曹晏诗，刘柯良. 社交网络数据驱动下旅游客运需求预测模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(10): 41-47.
[13]	戴权，刘长平，梁坤. 城际间私家车出行者的货运众包参与意愿研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(10): 48-53.
[14]	王凤武，张晓博，吉哲，王乐. 基于多变量LSTM模型的青岛港集装箱吞吐量预测[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(10): 54-61.
[15]	翁小雄, 覃镇林, 张鹏飞. 基于图卷积门控循环网络的个体地铁出行预测[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(09): 1-6.

基于港口环境效益的岸电与泊位联合分配优化研究

Optimization of Joint Allocation of Shore Power and Berth Based on Environmental Benefit of Por

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics