中文核心期刊
CSCD来源期刊
中国科技核心期刊
RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science) ›› 2014, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 11-15.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2014.03.03

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of Concrete Cable-Pylon Anchorage Models of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges

Ye Huawen , Xu Xun , Li Cuijuan , QiangShizhong   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University , Chengdu 610031 , Sichuan , China
  • Received:2013-01-18 Revised:2013-08-25 Online:2014-06-15 Published:2015-01-22

大跨斜拉桥混凝土索塔锚固结构形式比较

叶华文,徐勋,李翠娟,强士中   

  1. 西南交通大学土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 作者简介:叶华文(1982—),男,湖北黄冈人,副教授,主要从事大跨桥梁结构行为和钢桥疲劳行为方面的研究。E-mail:hbha2000@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51208430)

Abstract: Aiming at two typical categories of cable-pylon anchorage structure (hoop pre-stressing model and steel-concrete composite structure) , the transfer mechanism , stress distr由ution and horizontal cable-load distribution of three typical cable- pylon anchorages were contrasted in detail , with the consideration of relative full-scale model test. And each stress point and some measurements to improve the stress distribution were summarized. Load-carrying efficiency was presented as an estimation index. The results show that both hoops pre-stressing model and steel-concrete composite struclure can be applied lo long-span br:idges , and the hoop pre-stressing anchorage evidently performs better.

Key words: bridge engineering;cable-pylon anchorage, static test, mechanic behavior, stress situation, load-carrying effi clency

摘要: 针对索塔锚同结构常用的两类基本形式(环向预应力和钢混组合结构),结合相关足尺模型试验,详细比较了 三种典型锚固构造的传力机制、应力分布、索力分配,总结出各自受力要点和改善应力分布的一些措施;提出承载效 率作为评价指标。结果表明:两类形式均适用于大跨斜拉桥,环向预应力锚固形式优势明显。

关键词: 桥梁工程, 索塔锚固结构, 静载试验, 传力机理, 索力分配, 承载效率

CLC Number: