中文核心期刊
CSCD来源期刊
中国科技核心期刊
RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science) ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 67-74.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2023.02.10

• Transportation Infrastructure Engineering • Previous Articles    

Numerical Simulation of Tunnel Shaking Table Test andAnalysis on Vibration Input Meth

LIANG Bo1,2, ZHAO Fengbing1, LIU Tao1, REN Zhaodan3   

  1. (1. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Bridge and Tunnel Engineering in Mountainous Areas Jointly Constructed by the Ministry and the Province, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 3. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China)
  • Received:2021-04-23 Revised:2022-04-20 Published:2023-04-18

隧道振动台试验数值模拟及振动输入方法分析

梁波1,2,赵冯兵1,刘涛1,任兆丹3   

  1. (1. 重庆交通大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400074; 2. 重庆交通大学 省部共建山区桥梁及隧道工程国家重点实验室,重庆 400074; 3. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430063)
  • 作者简介:梁 波(1964—),男,四川隆昌人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究。E-mail:liang_laoshi@126.com 通信作者:赵冯兵(1985—),男,贵州遵义人,博士研究生,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究。E-mail:304459610@qq.com

Abstract: In view of the numerical simulation of the “model body-model box” system in tunnel shaking table test, the damping realization method of model foam boundary layer was analyzed by summarizing the dynamic finite element damping calculation method. The realization method of the bottom vibration input of the numerical model was discussed, and the calculation processes such as the large mass method and the displacement time-history input method were derived respectively. The calculation accuracy of the large mass method and the displacement time-history input method was compared and analyzed through the single-degree-of-freedom system. The advantages and disadvantages, as well as the feasibility in application of the proposed two methods were respectively analyzed. Taking the numerical calculation of a certain tunnel shaking table test as an example, the large mass method and the displacement time-history input method were respectively adopted to analyze the calculation models comparatively. The results show that the two proposed methods have similar overall accuracy in the numerical analysis of seismic action of the actual test model, but the large mass method is prone to produce cumulative displacement error.

Key words: tunnel engineering; model body; vibration input; damping realization; large

摘要: 针对隧道振动台试验中的“模型体-模型箱”体系数值模拟问题,通过总结动力有限元阻尼计算分析了模型泡沫边界层的阻尼实现方法。对数值模型底部振动输入的实现方式进行了讨论,分别推导了大质量法、位移时程输入法等计算过程,通过单自由度体系对比分析了大质量法和位移时程输入法的计算精度,分别讨论了两种实现方式的优缺点和在应用中的合理性;并以某隧道振动台试验模型的数值计算为例,分别采用大质量法和位移时程输入法对计算模型进行了对比分析,这两种方法在实际试验模型的地震作用数值分析中整体计算精度相近,但大质量法易产生位移累积误差。

关键词: 隧道工程;模型体;振动输入;阻尼实现;大质量法;位移时程输入法;数值计算

CLC Number: