连续变形场下的窄基坑抗隆起失稳上限解

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.03.06

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (682 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要: 以往对基坑抗隆起失稳的上限分析中，通常将土体分割成多个刚体快，忽略刚体快内部的剪切变形，且未考虑基坑的尺寸效应，因此难以反映基坑实际的变形机理。选择瑞利分布函数型式的位移增量，建立了Terzaghi机制下的窄基坑变形模型；采用了考虑土体各向异性和超固结比的土体抗剪强度表达形式，根据上限法原理，提出了考虑基坑几何尺寸的抗隆起安全系数计算方法；定量分析了基坑几何尺寸、超固结比和抗剪强度的各向异性系数等重要参数对抗隆起安全系数的影响规律。经典的基坑破坏案例和非线性有限元分析结果对比表明，考虑基坑几何尺寸的抗隆起安全系数计算方法考虑了内撑架设对基坑稳定性的影响，能够考虑基坑宽度和各向异性对抗隆起安全系数的影响。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王明年1
	2
	曾正强1
	2
	刘大刚1
	2
	武雪都3

关键词 ：隧道工程, 窄基坑抗隆起, 上限法, 连续变形, 各向异性, 超固结比

Abstract：In the upper limit analysis of anti-uplift instability of foundation pit in the past, the soil was usually divided into several rigid bodies, which neglected the shear deformation inside the rigid bodies and the size effect of foundation pit; thus, it was difficult to reflect the actual deformation mechanism of the foundation pit. The displacement increment of Rayleigh distribution function was selected, and the deformation model of narrow foundation pit under Terzaghi mechanism was established. The expression of the shear strength of soil considering soil anisotropy and over-consolidation ratio was adopted. According to the principle of upper bound method, the calculation method of safety coefficients of anti-uplift considering the geometric size of foundation pit was proposed. The influence rule of important parameters, including the geometric size of foundation pit, over-consolidation ratio and anisotropic coefficient of shear strength, on the safety coefficients of anti-uplift was quantitatively analyzed. The comparison between the classic foundation pit failure cases and the results of nonlinear finite element analysis shows that: in the proposed method, the influence of internal bracing erection on the stability of foundation pit is taken into account, and the influence of the width and anisotropy of foundation pit on the safety coefficient of anti-uplift can be considered.

Key words ： tunnel engineering, anti-uplift of narrow foundation pit, upper limit method, continuous deformation, anisotropy, over-consolidation ratio

收稿日期: 2019-09-24

PACS:

U452

基金资助:洛阳市轨道交通1号线项目〔LYGD1-ZX-HYFW-(2017)118-chlscky〕

作者简介: 王明年(1965—)，男，安徽舒城人，教授，博士，主要从事桥梁与隧道工程等方面的研究。E-mail：2051358687@qq.com。通信作者：刘大刚(1979—)，男，辽宁黑山人，副教授，博士，主要从事地下工程方面的研究。E-mail：1099415850@qq.com。

引用本文:

王明年1,2，曾正强1,2，刘大刚1,2，武雪都3. 连续变形场下的窄基坑抗隆起失稳上限解[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(03): 44-50.
WANG Mingnian1,2，ZENG Zhengqiang1,2，LIU Dagang1,2，WU Xuedu3. Upper Limit Solution for Anti-uplift Instability of Narrow Foundation Pit under Continuous Deformation Field. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2020, 39(03): 44-50.

链接本文:

http://xbzk.cqjtu.edu.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2020.03.06 或 http://xbzk.cqjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V39/I03/44

［1］唐震, 黄茂松, 袁聚云. 基于可变组合机构的黏土基坑抗隆起稳定性上限分析［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(增刊2): 180-183.
TANG Zhen, HUANG Maosong, YUAN Juyun. Upper bound analysis of basal stability of excavations in clay based on variable combined mechanism ［J］. Chinese Journal of
Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(Sup2): 180-183.
［2］黄茂松, 余生兵. 基坑抗隆起稳定的块体集上限分析［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(8): 1440-1447.
HUANG Maosong, YU Shengbing. Upper bound analysis of basal stability in undrained clay based on block set mechanism ［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical
Engineering, 2012, 34(8): 1440-1447.
［3］ HUANG Maosong, TANG Zhen, YUAN Jujun. Basal stability analysis of braced excavations with embedded walls in undrained clay using the upper bound theorem ［J
］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 79: 231-241. 2006, 132(4): 465-477.
［5］ LAM S Y, BOLTON M D. Energy conservation as a principle underlying mobilizable strength design for deep excavations ［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and
Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2011, 137(11): 1062-1074.
［6］ WANG Lizhong, LONG Fan. Base stability analysis of braced deep excavation in undrained anisotropic clay with upper bound theory ［J］. Science China
Technological Sciences, 2014, 57(9): 1865-1876.
［7］ WANG L Z, LIU Y J, HONG Y, et al. Predicting deformation of multipropped excavations in soft clay with a modified mobilizable strength design (MMSD) method
［J］. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 104: 54-68.
［8］徐洪钟, 孙鹏鹏, 崔文森, 等. 南京地铁基坑支护结构的MSD综合刚度及变形预估研究［J］. 中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(4): 907-912.
XU Hongzhong, SUN Pengpeng, CUI Wensen,et al. MSD synthetic system stiffness and deformation prediction of support structure for deep excavation in Nanjing subway
［J］. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018,47(4): 907-912.
［9］ BOLTON M D, LAM S Y, VARDANEGA P J,et al. Ground movements due to deep excavations in Shanghai: Design charts ［J］. Frontiers of Structural and Civil
Engineering, 2014, 8(3): 201-236.
［10］ OROURKE T D. Base stability and ground movement prediction for excavations in soft clay ［C］// Retaining Structures. Robinson College, Cambridge: The
Institution of Civil Engineers,1993.
［11］ JAMIOLKOWSKI M, LADD C C, GERMAINE J T,et al. New developments in field and laboratory testing of soils ［C］// Proceedings of the 11th International
Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Rotterdam, Netherlands: AA Balkema, 1985.
［12］王洪新. 基坑宽度对围护结构稳定性的影响［J］. 土木工程学报, 2011, 44(6): 120-126.
WANG Hongxin. Influence of excavation width on enclosure-structure stability of foundation pits ［J］. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(6): 120-126.
［13］ CASAGRANDE A, CARILLO N. Shear failure of anisotropic materials ［J］. Journal of Boston Society of Civil Engineering, 1944, 31: 74-87.
［14］ WHITTLE A J, UKRITCHON B, SU S F,et al. Base stability of deep excavation in anisotropic soft clay ［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental
Engineering, 2000, 126(8): 754-757.
［15］ HSIEH P G, OU C Y, LIU H T. Basal heave analysis of excavations with consideration of anisotropic undrained strength of clay ［J］. Canadian Geotechnical
Journal, 2008, 45(6): 788-799.
［16］ MAYNE P W. Determining OCR in clays from laboratory strength［J］.Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, 114(1): 76-92.
［17］ CHANG M F. Interpretation of overconsolidation ratio from in situ tests in recent clay deposits in Singapore and Malaysia ［J］. Canadian Geotechnical
Journal, 1991, 28(2): 210-225.
［18］ CHHENG C, LIKITLERSUANG S. Underground excavation behaviour in Bangkok using three-dimensional finite element method ［J］. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018,
95: 68-81.
［19］ HASHASH Y M A, WHITTLE A J. Ground movement prediction for deep excavations in soft clay ［J］. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 122(6): 474-486.