中文核心期刊
CSCD来源期刊
中国科技核心期刊
RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science) ›› 2003, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 52-55.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of the test results by sand-cone method and nuclear density meter

LIN Cheng-gong1,ZHAO Ming-jie 2,WU De-lun1   

  1. 1.Chongqing University , Chongqing 400045 , China ;2.Chongqing Jiaotong University , Chongqing 400074 , China
  • Received:2002-11-25 Revised:2003-01-10 Online:2003-09-15 Published:2015-05-18

砂锥法和核仪法密度试验比较

林成功1,赵明阶2,吴德伦1   

  1. 1.重庆大学土木工程学院,重庆 400045 ;2.重庆交通学院河海建筑工程系,重庆 400074
  • 作者简介:林成功(1947—),男,台北市人,高级工程师,博士生,主要从事路基工程及岩土工程.

Abstract: Compaction plays an important role in controlling quality of qarthfill works , especially with extensive area and considerable thickness of soils.The type of compaction equipment and the number of roller passes are the most important two factors, which influence the maximum dry density of compacted soils .Tests for inspecting of the quality of compacted soil can be conducted in the field and in the laboratory .are two common methods in determining the dry density of compacted soils in the field , and Standard or Modified proctor Test is in common in the laboratory .This papecr focuses mainly on comparison of the test resuts by the three methods mentioned above for a compacted embankment .The field densities are related to the number of roller passes as well as the amount of coarse particles;however , the test results from the Nuclear Density Meter do not show this relationship.

Key words: density test , the sand-cone method , the nucher method , proctor test , compactness.

摘要: 笔者对密度试验的砂锥法和核仪法进行现场对比试验研究和应用评价,其工程背景为台湾台北市新店地 区的路堤工程质量检验项目.采用现场密度试验的砂锥法、核仪法、及室内Proctor夯实试验等手段对其路堤一 个施工段的多种辗压工况进行试验,获得了各个方法的试验结果.并对测试结果进行了比较分析.研究结果表 明,施工路堤土密实度之大小与辗压机重量、频率及次数以及填土粗颗粒含量等相关:砂锥法、核仪法都是路基 的密实度检测的可行方法.值得指出的是,核仪法之量测精度难以反映填土颗粒不同所致的密度差异现象,且 与压实时最佳碾压次数的相关性较小.

关键词: 密度试验, 砂锥法, 核仪法, Proctor试验, 密实度, 道路工程

CLC Number: