|
Comparison of 2PB and 4PB Beam Fatigue Test Methods of HMA
LI Benliang1,HUANG Weidong1,MENG Huilin2,MA Huabao2
2017, 36(1):
46-51.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2017.01.09
Beam fatigue tests are commonly used to evaluate the fatigue characteristic of asphalt mixture around the world.2PB is widely used in Europe while more application of 4PB is found in USA. The two test methods are compared in test standards, specimen requirement, specimen aging condition, test conduction and application of test results. The conclusions are drawn that: 2PB is more complex in specimen preparation, demands more accurate geometry and more sophisticated test equipment, but the specimen is more homogeneity and representativeness than 4PB. Specimen cluing, fixing and replacing during the test is more time-consuming in 2PB test, making the test operation more complicated, also the maximum loading strain is no more than 500με in 2PB test. In contrast the specimen fixing and replacing, loading strain adjustment can be achieved by software controlling in 4PB test, making 4PB test an easy operation, also the maximum loading strain can be about 2 000με. More specimens are required to obtain a fatigue curve of in 2PB than that in 4PB, time-consuming in 2PB is more than double of that in 4PB. Fatigue life of 2PB test can be regarded as real fatigue of pavement in situ because of the observed cracks cross specimen after test but the fatigue life of 4PB test is conservative. Fatigue life variation of 2PB is smaller than 4PB. Test results of 2PB can be used for comparison as well as an input parameter in pavement design, results of 4PB can be only used for HMA comparison.
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
|