基于风-车-桥耦合振动的斜拉桥结构响应分析及行车评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2022.05.11

重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (05): 74-81.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0696.2022.05.11

基于风-车-桥耦合振动的斜拉桥结构响应分析及行车评价

宋腾腾1,2，荆国强3,4，吴肖波3,4，汪正兴3,4，严超5

(1. 温州市市政工程建设开发有限公司，浙江温州 325002； 2. 温州市七都大桥北汊桥建设有限公司，浙江温州 325088； 3. 中铁大桥科学研究院有限公司，湖北武汉 430034；4. 桥梁结构健康与安全国家重点实验室，湖北武汉 430034； 5.长安大学公路学院，陕西西安 710064)

收稿日期:2020-10-26 修回日期:2021-03-10 发布日期:2022-05-26
作者简介:宋腾腾（1993—），男，湖北孝昌人，高级工程师，主要从事桥梁结构方面的研究。E-mail:songtenten@qq.com 通信作者：严超（1994—），男，四川绵阳人，硕士，主要从事桥梁结构减振优化方面的研究。E-mail:changanbridge@chd.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（211021180357）

Structural Response and Driving Evaluation of Cable-Stayed Bridge Based on Wind-Vehicle-Bridge Coupling Vibration

SONG Tengteng1,2, JING Guoqiang3,4, WU Xiaobo3,4, WANG Zhengxing3,4, YAN Chao5

(1. Wenzhou Municipal Engineering Construction and Development Co., Ltd., Wenzhou 325002, Zhejiang, China; 2. Wenzhou Qidu Bridge Beichaqiao Construction Co., Ltd., Wenzhou 325088, Zhejiang, China; 3. China Railway Bridge Science Research Institute Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430034, Hubei, China; 4. National Key Laboratory for Bridge Structural Health and Safety, Wuhan 430034, Hubei, China; 5. School of Highway, Changan University, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, China)

Received:2020-10-26 Revised:2021-03-10 Published:2022-05-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为实现风和随机车流联合作用下斜拉桥结构响应分析及行车舒适性、安全性评价。首先，完善了风-车-桥耦合振动分析系统；其次，采用改进谐波合成法进行全桥三维风场模拟，分析了风和随机车流联合作用下的结构及车辆动力响应；最后，建立了行车安全性与舒适性评价准则，分析了风速、车速及路面粗糙度等对行车舒适性的影响，并联合车速及风向参数确定了高厢货车的行车事故临界风速。结果发现：密集运行状态下桥梁结构及高厢货车动力响应均大于稀疏运行状态，密集运行状态随机车流中高厢货车横向舒适性随风速的增大而降低，竖向舒适性随车速的增大及路面粗糙度水平的恶化而降低，其1/3倍频加速度RMS指标峰值影响范围介于2~10 Hz，均满足行车舒适性要求，基于所建立的分析流程，可确定特定车速与风偏角下的行车事故临界风速，车速为60 km/h、风偏角为70°时，行车事故临界风速为23.7 m/s。

关键词: 桥梁工程；斜拉桥；风-车-桥耦合系统；舒适性评价；安全性评价

Abstract: To realize the structural response analysis and driving comfort and safety evaluation of cable-stayed bridge under the combined action of wind and random traffic flow, the wind-vehicle-bridge coupling vibration analysis system was firstly improved. Secondly, the improved harmonic synthesis method was adopted to simulate the three-dimensional wind field of the whole bridge, and the dynamic responses of structure and vehicle were analyzed under the combined effect of wind and random traffic flow. Finally, driving safety and comfort evaluation criteria were established, and the influences of wind speed, vehicle speed and road surface roughness on driving comfort were investigated. Combined with the parameters of speed and wind direction, the critical wind speed of high compartment truck was determined. The results show that the dynamic response of bridge structure and high compartment truck in dense operation state is greater than that in sparse operation state. In the random traffic flow of dense operation state, the lateral comfort of high compartment trucks decreases with the increase of wind speed, and the vertical comfort decreases with the increase of vehicle speed and the deterioration of pavement roughness level. Its 1/3 frequency acceleration RMS index peak influence range is between 2~10 Hz, which meets the requirements of driving comfort. Based on the established analysis process, the critical wind speed of driving accident under specific speed and wind deflection angle can be determined. When the speed is 60km/h and the wind deflection angle is 70°, the critical wind speed of driving accident is 23.7m/s.

Key words: bridge engineering; cable-stayed bridge; wind-vehicle-bridge coupling system; driving comfort evaluation; safety assessment

中图分类号:

U441
U448.27

宋腾腾1,2，荆国强3,4，吴肖波3,4，汪正兴3,4，严超5. 基于风-车-桥耦合振动的斜拉桥结构响应分析及行车评价[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 41(05): 74-81.

SONG Tengteng1,2, JING Guoqiang3,4, WU Xiaobo3,4, WANG Zhengxing3,4, YAN Chao5. Structural Response and Driving Evaluation of Cable-Stayed Bridge Based on Wind-Vehicle-Bridge Coupling Vibration[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2022, 41(05): 74-81.

参考文献

［1］ CAI C S, CHEN S R. Framework of vehicle-bridge-wind dynamic analysis［J］. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 2004, 92: 579-607.
［2］李岩.大跨度斜拉桥风-车-桥动力响应及拉索疲劳可靠性研究［D］.哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2008．
LI Yan.Wind-Vehicle-Bridge Dynamic Response and Fatigue Reliability of Cables of Long Span Cable-Stayed Bridges［D］. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2008.
［3］ HAN Yan, HU J X, CAI C S, et al. Experimental and numerical study of aerodynamic forces on vehicles and bridges［J］. Wind and Structures, 2013, 17 (2): 163-184.
［4］ HAN Yan, CAI C S, ZHANG J R, et al. Effects of aerodynamic parameters on the dynamic response of road vehicles and bridges under cross winds［J］. Journal of
Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 134: 78-95.
［5］韩万水, 陈艾荣. 侧风与桥梁振动对车辆行驶舒适性影响研究［J］.土木工程学报,2008,41(4): 55-60.
HAN Wanshui, CHEN Airong.Effects of crosswind and bridge motion on ride comfort of road vehicles［J］. Journal of Civil Engineering, 2008, 41(4): 55-60.
［6］韩万水,陈艾荣. 风环境下行驶于大跨度桥梁上的车辆安全评价及影响因素研究［J］. 空气动力学学报,2008,26(4): 466-472.
HAN Wanshui, CHEN Airong.Safety assessment and influencing factors of vehicles running on long span bridges in wind environment［J］. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,
2008, 26(4): 466-472.
［7］李永乐, 赵凯, 陈宁, 等. 风-汽车-桥梁系统耦合振动及行车安全性分析［J］. 工程力学, 2012,29(5):206-212.
LI Yongle, ZHAO Kai, CHEN Ning, et al.Wind-vehicle-bridge system coupling vibration and traffic safety analysis［J］. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(5): 206-212.
［8］陈宁, 李永乐, 王云飞, 等. 考虑桥面风场等效气动效应的行车安全性分析［J］. 工程力学, 2017, 34(7):61-68.
CHEN Ning, LI Yongle, WANG Yunfei, et al.Safety analysis of road vehicles considering the equivalent aerodynamic effects of wind field above bridge deck［J］.
Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(7): 61-68.
［9］王仁贵, 刘伟庆, 李雪红, 等. 杭州湾跨海大桥行车舒适性评价［J］.南京工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(1):28-32.
WANG Rengui, LIU Weiqing, LI Xuehong, et al.Assessment of riding comfort degree on Hangzhou Bay bridge［J］. Journal of Nanjing Tech University (Natural Science
Edition), 2011, 33(1): 28-32.
［10］殷新锋, 丰锦铭, 杨小旺, 等. 风与车流联合作用下在役桥行车舒适性研究［J］. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(1):45-52.
YIN Xinfeng, FENG Jinming, YANG Xiaowang, et al. Ride comfort of existing bridges under combined loads of traffic and wind［J］. Journal of Hunan University(Natural
Sciences), 2016, 43(1): 45-52.
［11］韩万水.风-汽车-桥梁系统空间耦合振动研究［D］.上海:同济大学,2006.
HAN Wanshui. Three-Dimensional Coupling Vibration of Wind-Vehicle-Bridge System［D］. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2006.
［12］ SCANLAN R H. The action of flexible bridges under wind, Ⅱ: Buffe-ting theory［J］. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1978, 60(2): 201-211.
［13］ LI Q C, LIN Y K. New stochastic theory for bridge stability in turbu-lent flow. II［J］. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1995, 121(1): 102-116.
［14］ LIN Y K, LI Q C. New stochastic theory for bridge stability in turbu-lent flow［J］. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1993, 119(1): 113-127.
［15］刘焕举, 韩万水, 武隽, 等. 大跨径桥梁三维台风风场数值模拟［J］.振动与冲击,2017,36(24):77-84.
LIU Huanju,HAN Wanshui, WU Jun, et al. Numerical simulation of three-dimensional hurricane wind field around a long-span bridge［J］. Journal of Vibration and Shock,
2017, 36(24): 77-84.
［16］韩万水, 陈艾荣. 风-汽车-桥梁系统空间耦合振动研究［J］. 土木工程学报, 2007,40(9):53-58.
HAN Wanshui, CHEN Airong. Three-dimensional coupling vibration of wind-vehicle-bridge system［J］. Journal of Civil Engineering, 2007,40(9): 53-58.
［17］袁阳光, 郭雷, 裴浩楠, 等. G104国道卡车荷载概率特性分析［J］.北京工业大学学报,2017,43(11):1697-1705.
YUAN Yangguang, GUO Lei, PEI Haonan, et al. Truck load probabilistic characteristics of G104 highway［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2017, 43(11):
1697-1705.
［18］鲁乃唯, 刘扬, 肖新辉. 实测车流作用下大跨桥梁荷载效应极值外推法［J］.交通运输工程学报,2018,18(5):47-55.
LU Naiwei, LIU Yang, XIAO Xinhui. Extremum extrapolation method for load effect of long span bridge under measured traffic flow［J］. Journal of Transportation
Engineering, 2018, 18(5): 47-55.
［19］ BAKER C J. Measures to control vehicle movement at exposed sites during windy periods［J］.Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1987, 25
(2):151-161.

[1]	魏思斯, 耿波, 尚军年, 郑植, . 板桁结合悬索加劲钢桁梁桥特殊节点受力行为[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 42(1): 1-8.
[2]	蒲万丽1，林长生1，王郴2. 落石撞击双柱式桥梁的动态响应及损伤分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(08): 88-96.
[3]	刘金春，宋子轩，梁栋. 单箱三室连续梁桥在横向温度梯度与汽车偏载下的空间效应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(06): 80-86.
[4]	苏小波1，肖林2. 空间刚架结构钢-混结合段合理构造模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 40(04): 76-82.
[5]	陈思甜，彭庆，杨敏. 亢谷景区大跨径人行玻璃悬索桥人致振动响应分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(12): 60-66.
[6]	张军锋1,尹会娜1,孙大勇2,李杰1,陈淮1. 基于形函数推导考虑剪切变形的欧拉梁单元刚度矩阵[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(09): 59-66.
[7]	王滔1,2，徐恭义3，常城1,2，肖丽1,2，王民1,2. 大跨径低刚度钢桥面铺装三维仿真力学分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(09): 67-73.
[8]	吴海军1,2，何立1，韦跃3. 预应力混凝土梁桥挠度监测的温度效应分离方法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(08): 66-71.
[9]	严仁章1,2，朱美豪1,2，王帅3，邱俊澧1,2，周建庭1,2. 无铰索-拱复合结构设计与力学性能分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 39(07): 47-59.
[10]	吉伯海，徐捷，姚悦，傅中秋. 考虑荷载影响面的钢桥面板顶板-U肋焊缝疲劳损伤分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(11): 27-33.
[11]	张晓艳，汪富资，于辉，吴杰，唐亮. 基于面曲率变化的模型桥损伤识别方法研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(10): 33-40.
[12]	郭俊，刘胜红，高嵩，蔡林真. 自锚式独塔悬索桥竖向弯曲振动基频估算公式[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(05): 27-32.
[13]	张军锋, 朱冰, 李杰, 毛德豪, 陈代海. 计算模型对简支箱梁和T梁剪力滞结果影响[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 38(02): 7-12.
[14]	刘月飞1,2，肖青凯1,2，屈广1,2，樊学平1,2. 无先验信息情况下基于解耦极值荷载效应的桥梁时变可靠性分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 37(09): 1-6.
[15]	吉林1，孔祥明2，蒋波1，袁周致远2. 泰州大桥钢箱梁疲劳损伤评估及试验研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 37(08): 1-5.

基于风-车-桥耦合振动的斜拉桥结构响应分析及行车评价

Structural Response and Driving Evaluation of Cable-Stayed Bridge Based on Wind-Vehicle-Bridge Coupling Vibration

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics